It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by haarvik
The whole crux of the matter is that since the great social engineering that took place in the 60's, the divide between rich and poor has steadily increased. Prior to that one would have to be just about dead before they would accept any sort of assistance. People like my father and grandfather who worked countless hours trying to provide for their families. They didn't take handouts. When my parents divorced, my mother had to take welfare. But back then you had to work in order to get it. If you couldn't find a job, they found one for you. If you weren't willing to work, you didn't get assistance.
Now we have class wars because those of us who don't buy into the whole scam are sick and tired of supporting the lazy. There are a ton of people like me. We didn't settle for anything. We worked, sacrificed and scratched our way to what we wanted. If I were to become a multimillionaire tomorrow you bet your a$$ I would be taking it easy.
In the 80's I dated a single mother who was on welfare. I would find jobs for her and she would not take them because she made more on welfare than working. I once asked her if she had any pride. She said pride had nothing to do with it. It was her right to collect welfare as a US citizen. Needless to say that didn't last long. Those of you who support the notion of the poor welfare recipient have bought into the whole social project hook, line and sinker. I challenge you to sit back, evaluate your life and actually put a plan down on paper to better yourself without assistance. It is amazing what you can do when you have all of the facts in front of you. How do you become rich? How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.
That change which debilitates is not a mental illness-- it is an awareness. They know that trying and failing is a merciless event. No one who can help, will help. What little care there is is only from others who know that nothing can be done, and no help will come.
Originally posted by Frira
Reality check:
One step below what is described in the OP is homelessness.
It is a very long fall to the next level, with nothing in between.
TV's, and household appliances are added during good times of relative prosperity, but once the power goes out for failure to pay a bill, selling off the appliances is rarely the next step-- instead they try to hold on to what they have and skip mortgage payments or rent-- hoping for recovery.
Once the power or water is off, Child Protective Services can and will step in and either assist with relief to help pay the bills, or break up the family.
If no financial help is forthcoming-- the family loses all, and lives in a car. There may be some housing available, but many places have waiting lists.
Once an adult is homeless for more than a few months, the likelihood of getting off the street and staying off the street is very small. That becomes chronic homelessness. The change in the person's emotional state is usually debilitating for life. No one-- family, friends, co-works, neighbors, Church reaching out to save them-- it changes a person.
That change which debilitates is not a mental illness-- it is an awareness. They know that trying and failing is a merciless event. No one who can help, will help. What little care there is is only from others who know that nothing can be done, and no help will come.
Instead, people pass by talking on their latest i-Phone, sneer, "Get a job!" never guessing the person already works 40 hours a week. Before they can even rent an apartment or a room, they must first pay the utilities which they owed before being foreclosed or evicted. They have mountainess debts. Close family members are embarrassed, and say, "I don't what to do. He/she will just have to learn how to manage money-- oh, and by the way, did I tell you I think I know which model of this years BMW I want?... Maybe when Jack and I get back from France, we'll pick out the color..."
So, when the parent decides not to sell the child's x-box and the TV, sleepless that the decision seems to be forcing homelessness any week-- whenever the creditors come knocking... one might have a little compassion.
I work with homeless. I know their stories.
So how does one apply for a job, when your address is your car or a camp site in the woods on the edge of town? You cannot get a PO Box without a street address. Employers notice this and assume the person is a drug dealer, an alcoholic or deranged. Showing up at an interview with his or her "rig" (a backpack with everything they cannot afford to replace, but need) is a dead giveaway, but if they leave it at the campsite-- a newly homeless person-- usually a youth-- will help him or herself.
No TV, no electricity, one cannot even read or write in the dark-- only sits and feel one's uselessness-- knowing one was considered disposable by all those who they loved and knew. There is no socialization or entertainment in the dark, much less in the light of day when it freezing or scorching. So, the typical human will seek escape-- alcohol or drugs. And all the while, society who has no idea of their plight-- and takes no responsibility for watching them fall and not offering a hand, sits in judgment, saying, "They must have done something to deserve this. Someone should do something about these lazy bums! Surely they must all be rapists prostitutes and thieves-- we need to be protected from them."
And the homeless man or woman, knows that is how they are seen.
And it all started because the had an x-box and a TV just before they fell to the streets-- our streets.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
I couldn't wait to get to your post because I wanted to expose how easily people who at the best are on the outside looking in, and at the worst are liars, portray someone elses situation.
Lets go to the underlined when you compare your situation with a friends.
I'll take it that you are just someone interpreting her situation the wrong way and not intentionally lying. Since I work in welfare and employment i'm aware of the laws.
1. If she works about 20 hours per week at $12-$13 per hour her foodstamps are minimum. She may only be getting $20 worth per month.
2. If she's receiving $1300 per month in child support, that would totally disqualify her for foodstamps unless she has 20 children.
3. She also qualifies for no (unless she has a large number of children) public housing assistance because of the $1300 in child support.
4. Her working those 20 hours per week and getting $1300 per month in child support disqualifies her from any government assistance.
Now someone reading this post from you, because it was well typed and seemed sincere, would think that woman is mooching off society. When actually, perhaps you misinterpret her situation, she doesn't qualify and doesn't receive anything or at most $20 per month of EBT.
So here you are making $40 per hour....and you're all in the purse of someone earning $13 per hour part time and receiving child support.
You wouldn't happen to be Rush Limbaugh would you?
Relative poverty measurements can sometimes produce odd results, especially in small populations. For example, if the median household in a wealthy neighborhood earns US$1 million each year, then a family that earns US$100,000 would be considered poor on the relative poverty scale, even though such a family could meet all of its basic needs and much more. At the other end of the scale, if the median household in a very poor neighborhood earned only 50% of what it needs to buy food, then a person who earned the median income would not be considered poor on a relative poverty scale, even though the person is clearly poor on an absolute poverty scale.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
These are the folks who receive tax payer subsidies, what the left calls a "safety net".
Its about time we had an honest discussion about what the objectives of our social policy are really all about because the current one, the one we have employeed since the Great Society in the 60s has been plain old socialism. The debate today is all about how far we want to extend it.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
**I will NEVER refuse food to someone that asks. It doesn't matter where I am, or what I am doing. The problem is, people often ask me for food, and when I offer to go inside and get them whatever they want, they change their story and they really need gas, so when I offer to go buy them a gas can and fill it up, what they really meant to say was they need CASH!
**I will NEVER refuse work to someone. I have a big yard, I have friends with construction companies, I have a little extra cash, I will gladly put someone to work if they ask. I will loan them my gloves, and some tools if they need it. I will put them up in a room for their first night or two to get them started. Guess how many "homeless" have ever taken me up on those offers? "Will WORK for food" my arse!
**As a matter of fact, I won't even refuse BEER to someone. If I see a sign that says, NEED BEER, or Will Work for Beer, I'll happily oblige.
What I won't oblige is being lied to, being taken for a fool, or being harassed by some loser.
Sorry, but for all of you bleeding hearts reading these accounts on the internet. I dare you to go and try to help. Your opinions will quickly change. And yet, I still make it my mission to treat every single case uniquely, and I always offer food, I always listen to the heartfelt story (once), and I always offer work and shelter.
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by tncryptogal
I would agree with you. I have friends who are hard working and yet poor. I also watch them buy $6 packs of cigarettes and $12 cases of beer every other night. I don't empathize with them because they are their own enemy. Yes it is nice to have a big TV and the fastest internet and the newest cell phone. But to have them and then complain that you can't afford anything is your fault, not Bill Gates' fault. Something our generation will never have in common with the depression era is they "lived within their means". They sacrificed during the hard times so they could have rewards when things got better.
How many of you shop thrift stores, or go to yard sales or use craigslist to find things you need? There is a difference between having new nice things and having used nice things. I refuse to pay $40 for a pair of pants. I will go to a yard sale and get nearly new for 50 cents. I couldn't tell you the last time I bought a new shirt, shorts or pants. Why should I when there are perfectly good ones for pennies on the dollar? If you saw me in public you would not know. I have all the name brands. I pay cash for my cars, I don't finance. They may not be new, but they are reliable and get me from point A to point B. We are so caught up in materialism that we forget how to live and to live within our means.