Leaked Footage Of UFO Following Shuttle 2011?

Originally posted by JimOberg
The video is from STS-87 and can be seen here:
www.youtube.com...
AERCAM starts at 5:45, see especially 6:18 [the exact scene misrepresented], runs to 6:36

Is there any alternative to judging the youtube poster a liar?

What does this make this thread's OP?

I don know if a lier or not. It does not really matter to me what was the mission that they filmed it. But the object still continues there. In the video you posted at 6:18. So...

Originally posted by JimOberg

Originally posted by rykc27
reply to post by DerbyCityLights

 

You could very well be right. After having read the article and seen what the "droids" look like,
this could be the "yellow" one using the shuttle to test it's ability at formation flying. Also, as you have said,
this could be the reason nasa doesn't want to comment on it as yet.
Hopefully, we will find out eventually.

You will never "find out" about stuff like this until you learn to do some original background research yourself, AND stop swallowing such drivel as the falsified "top secret leak" description from youtube.

But you get partial credit for finding out about the SPHERE experiment, although if you read anything about it, you'll realize the spheres are for internal space station use only.

As long as enough people keep gullibly falling for this kind of stuff, there will be people willing and eager to keep feeding it to you for fun, profit, glee, or malice.

so what is it then?

I am interested

reply to post by RUSSO


The object is a remote controlled camera.

This is what Jim Oberg is telling you.



en.wikipedia.org...
spaceflight.nasa.gov...
aercam.jsc.nasa.gov...

reply to post by RUSSO

And you are here not to seek the truth and deny ignorance

Be careful what you say next mate.

This has been proven to NOT a UFO.

Hoax forum awaits!

reply to post by Chadwickus


If it was moisture, why would there be a shadow on the bottom of it?

How big would that drop be in proportion to the field of view?

It looks further out than on the window to me?

reply to post by Chadwickus



That explains it properly.

reply to post by guessing


And what about the other smaller objects moving the exact same way?

And that they all move in relation to the camera.

Oh and there's some sort of smudge under the "UFO" right before it moves.

You may need to zoom the video in to see all this better.

reply to post by Chadwickus



at 2.22 on this vid?
sts 51-A
I saw the smudge. So this is a moisture drop on the window?

[yvid][/yvid]

Here are some more links.

NASA wanted to build a long-duration model for the space station but never got it funded, although it struck me as a really good idea.

If the 'Columbia' astronauts had had such a capability it could have detected their ship's lethal heatshield wound in time to try repair or rescue.

Autonomous Extravehicular Robotic Camera (AERCam)
aercam.jsc.nasa.gov... and spaceflight.nasa.gov...

Little Free Flier Offers Astronauts an Eye Outside
www.nasa.gov...

Buy a photo of it over STS-87 payload bay:
cgi.ebay.com...

STS-87 mission
www.youtube.com...
5:45, especially 6:18 [exact scene misrepresented], to 6:36

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by RUSSO

 

And you are here not to seek the truth and deny ignorance

Be careful what you say next mate.

This has been proven to NOT a UFO.

Hoax forum awaits!

Why? What you will gonna do Mr cgi guy?

Not a ufo, thanks to Jim. Not thanks to you.

Well this is not a remote control camera.

Originally posted by guessing
reply to post by Chadwickus

 

at 2.22 on this vid?

First step, tell me the date/time of this image so sequential surrounding images can be examined.

What, lunacognita refuses to tell you?

Based on the nature of the image that began this thread, and the withholding of that same information in that case, WHAT does that suggest about his intentions regarding this other image?

Without the context and the eyewitness testimony, it's worse than useless to demand explanations of such pictures, when any competent investigation is deliberately stymied by non-disclosure of information crucial to a real investigation.

reply to post by RUSSO
Nice Job...Thanks for posting.
s&f for you.

Originally posted by RUSSO
Well this is not a remote control camera.

edit on 19-7-2011 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)

Russo, this looks to me to be a deliberately deceptive response that is clear indication of intent to mislead.

Here's how it has transpired:

An explanation -- documented, unambiguous, overwhelmingly valid -- is offered for an image that you endorsed as unexplainable.

Rather than admit that you were wrong, you pick ANOTHER image and attempt to pooh-pooh the first explanation by pointing out that it does NOT fit the SECOND image.

[edit add: I'm not clear but it seems one of your posts may be admitting that explanation is correct]

[delete criticism]

Originally posted by JimOberg

Originally posted by guessing
reply to post by Chadwickus

 

at 2.22 on this vid?

First step, tell me the date/time of this image so sequential surrounding images can be examined.

What, lunacognita refuses to tell you?

Based on the nature of the image that began this thread, and the withholding of that same information in that case, WHAT does that suggest about his intentions regarding this other image?

Without the context and the eyewitness testimony, it's worse than useless to demand explanations of such pictures, when any competent investigation is deliberately stymied by non-disclosure of information crucial to a real investigation.

This completey true. However I noticed this independantly of any prejudice and I am interested as to what it could be.

is it a water drop on the window?

if it is then i will be able to sleep tonight

if it is not water or moisture then what else could it be?

Here's an exchange I had with Dale Gardner, an old friend of mine who was in the spacesuit in that picture:

[email protected] wrote:
Dear Dale:
Here's a funny story about STS 51-A that I wanted to ask you about. During one of the Palapa/Westar MMU grapples, some in-cabin video through the overhead window shows something on the window -- I recall being told it was a drop of orange juice, but I forget where I heard it. As you can imagine, some folks have gone wild with this image -- they misinterpret its motions as inherent, and not the result of the hand-held camera movement.
Do you recall noticing the blob when you reviewed the video post-flight, and anybody commenting on it? Is there anybody else who might have anything to say in an explanatory manner that might be useful in explaining this?
WAVE file of ’STS-37’ (mistaken identification) available at
home-1.worldonline.nl...
Same video, identified as STS 51-A,
www.qtm.net...
Jim


Date: 6/26/01 10:28:07 AM Central Daylight Time
From: [email protected] (Dale Gardner)
To: [email protected]
Hi, Jim -- good to hear from you.
I have no recollection of the blob at all -- do not remember seeing it on the images, hearing discussions of it, etc. And, as you might imagine, I never saw any blob-like space object flying past my left shoulder while doing the EVA. Dave Walker probably took the video, but he isn't around to ask anymore.
Next best would be Joe Allen, who was our onboard "official photographer" and took much interest in all the still photos and videos from the flight
Dale

What a bizarre idea! Actually, go ask the first-hand witness. Any UFO researcher who had done so, could have gotten the same answer -- but wait, if they did, they probably would have thrown it away and not shared it. Can't have inconvenient eyewitness testimony getting in the way of duping the rubes.

reply to post by RUSSO


Where did I call the video in your OP CGI?

I never thought that was CGI, not that you'd believe that claim, maybe I should take a screenshot of my search history where I was searching youtube for satellite launch from the shuttle videos...because that is what I thought it was.

Yes a big thanks to Jim, his knowledge of shuttle missions is far greater than yours and mine.

And far, far, far greater than that hoax youtube channel aliendisclosuregroup.

If it makes you feel better, you can ask zorgon to hold your hand and tell you what to think?

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by RUSSO

 

If it makes you feel better, you can ask zorgon to hold your hand and tell you what to think?

You mean like Jim did to you?

Zorgon is one of the best here. Are you jealous about him?


About the cgi, here is your post.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
This is a two part series it seems...

The CGI is poorly done, then there's that great chestnut that the shuttle fired on it.

reply to post by RUSSO


Oh I forgot, you can't see what's directly in front of you.

See how I'm commenting on the video I posted?

And the comment about the shuttle firing at the UFO?

No?

Can't believe I'm trying to justify myself to you....

Screenshot of my search:

files.abovetopsecret.com...

I trust you can work out the times?

If it helps I'm GMT +8