posted on Jul, 21 2011 @ 06:51 PM
reply to post by ErtaiNaGia
Yes. I am the least subtle disinformation agent in the world. You have found me out with your amazing detective skills.
For those not actually in the know, "fnord" is a word that originates in the Principia Discordia, the least serious religious text on the planet.
It is, there, simply a nonsense word meant to unsettle and amuse. Its most prominent use in the text is some variant of the phrase "If you can't see
the fnords, they can't eat you!"
Illuminatus!, the least serious conspiracy novel on the planet, used the word "fnord" to stand in for a word (or possibly symbol) which the book
"claims" we are all trained from childhood to have visceral reactions to. this symbol is inserted into serious news to make us uncomfrotable and
disinterested in the story, and to act with knee-jerk reactions. It's not put into ads in an effort to addict us to purchasing things.
So, while I am in fact using "fnoooordtastic" in the Discordian sense -- in that I intend to be an unexpected or random element in any system, an
end which I ironically enough aim for by being a voice of rationality here -- even if I were using it in the Disinformation sense, I would be
encouraging this group into rash action, rather than attempting to make sure that we attack those who deserve it. I would be doing the exact opposite
of what I'm doing; I would be encouraging lax thinking and either complete inaction or instant action, rather than measured thinking and careful
Consider this: If the elites were as powerful as most of you think, don't you think they could have done this without casting any
eyes on Murdoch? If they are as powerful as many of you allege, isn't it possible that they want
us to blame Murdoch and
Cameron, rather than whatever's really responsible?