It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sovaka
reply to post by SaturnFX
As I have stated before... There are two sides to this coin.
The protection in the Constitution of both Freedom of choice in Religion, and also to be free FROM Religion.
Which ever side you take, you are basically going against the Constitution.
I say go with the option that gives everyone what they are after.
For me... That would be Tails.
The choice to be in a community free from a certain or all Religions.
Originally posted by Sovaka
reply to post by SaturnFX
No but said laws can be a local edict of a town/city.
In regards to your comment on buying land and dictating whom you sell it to.
That is all well and good until your neighbor decides to move. Then you have no choice in who moves in.
This would be the idea behind a Community/Town.
Where someone would buy up several thousand acres and actually set this up.
How would you handle the situation when this Community grows beyond Town and to a City status?
Originally posted by Sovaka
The Freedom to live in a town that wishes NO RELIGIOUS influence.
IE Banning the erection of any Religious buildings or the admittance of any Religious person.
Originally posted by Sovaka
Actually yes... Yes I would.
I plan to create one too.
It is of my belief, that most of modern society should revert to commune's.
grace-and-truth.org...
We should understand that Islam is not a religion in the Western sense of the word. The aim of Islam is to establish a state religion, which means Islam needs a religious state. Only when Islam becomes a state, is Islam fully developed.
Muslims calling for Sharia law isn't that different from many Christians wanting the ten commandments to be everywhere.