Originally posted by SG-17
reply to post by byteshertz
The end of the last Ice Age raised the global sea level by several feet (this is a lot). Many then-coastal settlements would have been flooded. Not to
mention the Black Sea Deluge.
As I said Science describes what we can measure - which isnt a lot.
From what we can measure we then establish facts.
We use facts to create theories. The facts are the dots in a dot to dot, Theories are the lines.
We have a lot of dots, a few promising looking lines, but we have no idea what the big picture is.
So you can continue trying to prove your point, but all you are proving is that you draw a good conclusion from what you currently know. To anyone who
thinks they have knowledge beyond your sources that allows them to see a more of the picture or a different picture, you dismiss because it does not
match your view.
So either:
- You struggle to grasp this concept
(To which I would say you are likely going to continue trying to answer with more science)
- You believe that science see's enough of this reality to draw conclusions on the big picture
(To which I would say go back to the science books, because the you will soon find the more you learn the more you realise you know nothing)
- You believe science does not see enough of this reality to draw a conclusion on the picture
(To which I would say do you not consider that if the creator existed he would be the big picture, and all your science would mean nothing for all you
know he creates your memories, none of this is real or everything could be changing constantly but you do not percieve it.)
Reality is all perception my friend, science is still just grasping this concept - but the scientific theory is there to back it up if you want to
talk theory. We can start talking multiverses and the mathematics of why they are theoretical but the limitations of us being in this universe
restrict our ability to measure outside them.
Or we could talk about the limitation of science to be able to pinpoint where mass actually comes from because everything we look inside is 99.999999%
empty
We could talk about radioactive decay rate models recently proven to be wrong changing the dating system which we seem to treat as concreate.
Or we could just realise science answers our reality, not the reality.
Science is the perception of reality not reality, if we keep relying on science like it is religion without realising what it actually tell's us then
it is no different to any other failure to deny ignorance.
edit on 19-7-2011 by byteshertz because: (no reason given)