It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Only the LEO is tasering the guy to get him to drop his gun or his suicide vest in this case.
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
Originally posted by CREAM
Originally posted by DerbyCityLights
Its the equvilant of a global pillow fight. Water Cannons? Sounds like they were NOT attempting to cause bodily harm but rather drive them away.
At least this time, I guess they got to much bad press when they just opened fire on the innocent civilians trying to give humanitarian aid. But just because they chose a non-lethal method doesnt mean its OK, that aid could have saved lives. This topic makes me cringe.
It's akin to a LEO tasering someone repeatedly while handcuffed. Just my two cents.
And Hamas is a cowardly terror group that hides behind women and children while firing rockets from hospitals and giving suicide/homicide vests to their young children.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
Regardless of what you think your most recent post is purely opinion. Meanwhile, it's still a fact that the U.N. And many other governing bodies have declared the blockade illegal. The international laws you quoted could just as easily be interpreted to imply a blockade on Israel due to their conduct in domestic and internation affairs. At the end of the day the Israeli government is just q big bully playing the victim card.edit on 15-7-2011 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by CREAM
And whats wrong with forwarding that aid through the accepted channels?? Ie; send it to the port of Ashdod in Israel, or Al Arish in Egypt, where it will be brought by trucks into the Gaza strip.
Either way they get the aid. Isnt that the important thing? Why provoke Israel for?? Its insulting. Israel doesnt want so called "peace acitivists" to make a mockery of their sovereignty; and by refusing to listen to their warnings to continue to try to breach the bloackade deserves much more in my opinion than a water cannon attack.
Theres a COMPLETELY valid and logical reason for why the blockade exists. Hamas is a terrorist organization elected by the people of Gaza - to essentially kill Israelis. To counter this organization and its amoral tactics, Israel has enforced a maritime blockade which prevents them from getting their much desired weapons/ammunition from overseas.
Its completely logical. For some sick reason, liberals dont give a #. Its better that Hamas get their weapons/ammunition, kill Israelis, and then blame Israel for their "disproportionate' response.
I say # the international community,. They clearly dont have Israel/Jewish interests in mind.edit on 15-7-2011 by dontreally because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by CREAM
And whats wrong with forwarding that aid through the accepted channels?? Ie; send it to the port of Ashdod in Israel, or Al Arish in Egypt, where it will be brought by trucks into the Gaza strip.
Either way they get the aid. Isnt that the important thing? Why provoke Israel for?? Its insulting. Israel doesnt want so called "peace acitivists" to make a mockery of their sovereignty; and by refusing to listen to their warnings to continue to try to breach the bloackade deserves much more in my opinion than a water cannon attack.
Theres a COMPLETELY valid and logical reason for why the blockade exists. Hamas is a terrorist organization elected by the people of Gaza - to essentially kill Israelis. To counter this organization and its amoral tactics, Israel has enforced a maritime blockade which prevents them from getting their much desired weapons/ammunition from overseas.
Its completely logical. For some sick reason, liberals dont give a #. Its better that Hamas get their weapons/ammunition, kill Israelis, and then blame Israel for their "disproportionate' response.
I say # the international community,. They clearly dont have Israel/Jewish interests in mind.edit on 15-7-2011 by dontreally because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
It's a known fact that the blockade is illegal. Not that I put much weight in the U.N., but even a U.N. Committee has deemed the blockade of Gaza illegal. Many other countries openly announce their disagreement with the blockade. What are your thoughts on that?
Originally posted by DerbyCityLights
Its the equvilant of a global pillow fight. Water Cannons? Sounds like they were NOT attempting to cause bodily harm but rather drive them away.
GENEVA — United Nations human rights chief Navi Pillay on Friday accused Israel of violating the rules of warfare with its blockade stopping people and goods from moving in or out of the Gaza Strip.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by jed001
U.N. Human Rights Chief: Israel's Blockade of Gaza Strip Is Illegal
GENEVA — United Nations human rights chief Navi Pillay on Friday accused Israel of violating the rules of warfare with its blockade stopping people and goods from moving in or out of the Gaza Strip.
Feel free to do your own web search. It's simple really. There are plenty of sources confirming this, take a pick. And here I was thinking everyone knew this
Originally posted by jed001
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by jed001
U.N. Human Rights Chief: Israel's Blockade of Gaza Strip Is Illegal
GENEVA — United Nations human rights chief Navi Pillay on Friday accused Israel of violating the rules of warfare with its blockade stopping people and goods from moving in or out of the Gaza Strip.
Feel free to do your own web search. It's simple really. There are plenty of sources confirming this, take a pick. And here I was thinking everyone knew this
i took you advice and did my own reaserch and found that the blockade is legal. i guess it depends on where you look
CAN ISRAEL IMPOSE A NAVAL BLOCKADE ON GAZA?
Yes it can, according to the law of blockade which was derived from customary international law and codified in the 1909 Declaration of London. It was updated in 1994 in a legally recognized document called the "San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea."
"Restricted basic agricultural inputs: * Seeds and seedlings, Plastic piping * Water pumps/filters/irrigation pipes * Fishing nets, Engine spare parts * Veterinary drugs (for raising cattle) * Cement" (also from the UN link) Can anyone say genocide?
Originally posted by jed001
reply to post by CREAM
if i'm not mistaken gaza is run by a know terrorist group, hamas. If the people of gaza would denounce Hamas and ask the UN to help get rid of them maybe there would be no need for a blockade.
–noun 1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes. 2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization. 3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
Hamas has attacked and is still attacking Israel. They can defend themselves. One of the historically recognized, and often used, methods of defense is to prevent your enemy from receiving war material. A blockade is an accepted method of so doing.
Article 51 provides for the right of countries to engage in self-defence, including collective self-defence, against an armed attack.
“ Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.