posted on Jul, 15 2011 @ 10:47 PM
Originally posted by kro32
That's fine but Ghaddafi has held public hangings and televised executions which i'm sure has helped sway voters into voting for him and discouraged
any running against him.
To say that he has run legitimate campaigns is just a fallicy.
Yes, the Libyan regime was such a savage beast, in all of 2010 only 10 people were executed and they were all convicted murderers.
What a savage regime right? A regime which ordered its security forces not to shoot at armed gangs who which the media portrayed as peaceful
protesters. Did you know in the first day of the supposed peaceful protests, police were attacked, buildings were set on fire, and only around 100
thugs were involved? The media called it violent crack down by the Libyan regime, but it was kinda the opposite, the thugs were violently cracking
down on security forces, attacking them, and on the first day 10/14 of the injured were security forces.
Yes, very savage, so savage that the Libyan regime released over 700 prisoners, when did that ever happen in US where millions are locked up?
Do you even know why those thugs managed to take over Benghazi so quick? Surely it wasn't because the security forces were ordered to shoot, rather
the opposite. If there was a violent crack down, all these hundreds of thugs would have been captured and hanged in public, but instead, the Libyan
regime was naive, thinking that they merely wanted reform, so instead of getting rid of the infiltrators, they told the security forces not to shoot.
Most would agree, that these thugs had an intention of causing a regime change using any means necessary, because they were hired to do so. They
don't represent Libyans, they represent the CIA, as reports suggests these thugs were hired, trained and financed by CIA, and the same thugs tried to
implement a regime change previously as well, but failed miserably.