Why are kids taught in public schools to believe in next to impossible chance, rather than God?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 09:41 PM by Frontkjemper
reply to post by megabytz



The OP is discussing the origins of Earth, like the big bang. I'm not talking about evolution, troll harder next time.


reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 09:43 PM by addygrace
Originally posted by megabytz
Originally posted by addygrace
Originally posted by TheOneElectric
reply to
post by addygrace



This is a troll thread right? Please tell me this is a troll thread?

The American government is not allowed to force any type of religion or spirituality upon Students.
Furthermore, accepted scientific theories are worked into the learning process, as they help students understand the basics of biology and chemistry, giving them further insight to the cycle of life and creation around them.

It'd be asinine to hear "God did it" in a science class. Seriously, go find a bridge to crawl under.

Would you say, it would be asinine to teach imaginative ideas that have not been observed in science class?


Not everything has to be directly observed in science.

Have you ever directly observed gravity?

What about air?

Have you ever directly observed DNA mutation?

So, Abiogenesis is on the same level as gravity and air?


reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 09:48 PM by megabytz
reply to post by GummB




I disagree with the air, if I see a bubble rising in water am I not directly seeing air. It is not solid, I can see what is on the other side, however I can still see it is there. therefor am I not "seeing" it


Okay let me rephrase it, are you seeing the oxygen, nitrogen, argon, and carbon dioxide that make up air? Air may have been a poor example but even a bubble is an effect of trapped air under water.



as for seeing the effects of gravity I agree, but is seeing the effects not clear evidence of it itself


Yes the effects are evidence of some type of force, but you aren't directly observing that force. Can you see the curvature of space-time? It is multiple observances of various phenomenon that allow us to deduce the existence of gravity.

When I asked those questions I was assuming he was using the usual argument that evolution has never been directly observed. Which it has, just not in the way he thinks.

Better examples may have been the core of the earth, the core of Jupiter, or the origin of the moon. None of which have been directly observed.

edit on 14-7-2011 by megabytz because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 09:52 PM by megabytz
Originally posted by addygrace
Originally posted by megabytz
Originally posted by addygrace
Originally posted by TheOneElectric
reply to
post by addygrace



This is a troll thread right? Please tell me this is a troll thread?

The American government is not allowed to force any type of religion or spirituality upon Students.
Furthermore, accepted scientific theories are worked into the learning process, as they help students understand the basics of biology and chemistry, giving them further insight to the cycle of life and creation around them.

It'd be asinine to hear "God did it" in a science class. Seriously, go find a bridge to crawl under.

Would you say, it would be asinine to teach imaginative ideas that have not been observed in science class?


Not everything has to be directly observed in science.

Have you ever directly observed gravity?

What about air?

Have you ever directly observed DNA mutation?

So, Abiogenesis is on the same level as gravity and air?


Did I say it was?

Now you understand that evolution isn't referring to the origins of life?

Your last post you were speaking of evolution.

Air isn't really a theory I was just using that as something that is not directly observed.

Yes evolution could be considered on the same 'level with gravity', even though they are two different fields of science.

Abiogenesis is a work in progress. There are a few different hypothesis.


reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 09:53 PM by megabytz
Originally posted by Frontkjemper
reply to
post by megabytz



The OP is discussing the origins of Earth, like the big bang. I'm not talking about evolution, troll harder next time.


troll harder? Really?

As far as the big bang, my comment still applies.

Talk about me trolling, can you really be that ignorant?

Do you like to just throw that term out like a child?

The origins of earth would not fall under the big bang. The big bang is the prevailing theory of the early universe.
edit on 14-7-2011 by megabytz because: (no reason given)
edit on 14-7-2011 by megabytz because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 10:03 PM by megabytz
reply to post by addygrace



Please show one science textbook that teaches any of the hypothesis of abiogenesis as fact.

Your not going to have a leg to stand on so your going to have to revert back to the theory of evolution being taught in schools.

They may teach the various aspects of the hypothesis encompassed within the umbrella term abiogenesis, such as the Miller-Urey Experiment, but they in no way proclaim that this is how life began.


edit on 14-7-2011 by megabytz because: (no reason given)
edit on 14-7-2011 by megabytz because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 10:30 PM by TupacShakur
Why are kids taught in public schools to believe in next to impossible chance, rather than God?


Impossible chance, really? Do you understand how incredibly massive the universe is? In our galaxy alone, there are over 100 billion stars. In the observable universe, there are estimated to be hundreds of billions and even trillions of galaxies. Evidence has recently surfaced indicating that parallel universes might even exist. So if there are an incomprehensible amount of stars in the universe, do you really think it's impossible?

Over billions of years, the right chemicals are bound to form given the ideal planetary conditions. The planet has to be the right distance from the sun so that the oceans won't boil or freeze, it has to have an iron core and magnetic field that will deflect charged particles from the sun, and an atmosphere. Over millions, even billions of years, with thousands of asteroids and comets slamming into the planet, the right chemicals eventually will form by sheer chance, setting the stage for single-celled organisms to evolve into the life-forms we are today.

It's not impossible, because it happened.

If it's just the observable that's being taught in the Science classes, then why even entertain any imaginative idea of origins?
So instead of teaching science, we should teach....imagination? God is just a cop out for science anyway, back in the day when we didn't even know that the earth was round we had to figure out a way to explain our existence and the creation of the universe, so some deity that just sharted out the universe one day was that cop-out. Now that we actually have a pretty detailed understanding of Astronomy and Physics, we know there's a lot more to the universe than God snapping his fingers, and creating Adam and Eve to inbreed humanity into mutated retardation. However some still chose to believe that flawed book, if you want to believe that some old dude put two of every species on the planet on a boat to survive a flood, you're more than Constitutionally welcome to. However pushing your fairy-tale beliefs onto others is crossing the line, especially because there is more than just your religion, so we would have to accomodate to suit everybodys beleifs and then it wouldn't be school, it would be Sunday school on steroids.
edit on 14-7-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my post



reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 10:33 PM by addygrace
Originally posted by megabytz
reply to
post by addygrace



Please show one science textbook that teaches any of the hypothesis of abiogenesis as fact.

Why is abiogenesis even mentioned in school? Abiogenesis actually talks about life coming from non-life. The only thing we've observed is life coming from life, or biogenesis. My OP is basically stating; If we allow an imaginative idea about the origins of life to be taught in a science classroom, then what's the problem with teaching about other imaginitive ideas about the origins of life being taught in a science classroom.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



How Are Plants Aware of the World Around Them?
  Posted 3 days ago with 5 member flags
The Genesis Code
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Explain Diversity Reloaded
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Tree of Life and Tree of Knowledge
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags
The carrot (chicken or egg , vegetable version)
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags
A theory of proof of a God
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Eden: The Double Sided Coin
  Posted 5 days ago with 2 member flags
We are all connected with nature and The Universe IMO
  Posted 5 days ago with 2 member flags