It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Reasonable Conclusion to Explain Pre-Big Bang Conditions.

page: 8
6
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 10:11 AM
link   
The thing about the universe is we grow towards infinity. Awareness moves from nothing to infinity as each now moment through time. The universe doesn't move towards nothingness so when it tries, it is often an agonizing task. To move towards nothingness is to go against the flow. This is why emotions like anger and hatred are usually less than desirable emotions. Its just natural.

When you love everything, you are loving where everything is going. This is why love is associated with acceptance. It is because you accept your natural path and natural movement. Things are made easy for you. Life becomes good.

When you are consciously participating in each now moment, you are accepting yourself as going with the flow and moving from negative to positive. Your life can only get better.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 10:48 AM
link   
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


What you are is already complete. There is no becoming, no somewhere to get, you have arrived when you realize this.
This is it now.
Nowhere to go (now-here).
What you are never moves, it was, it is and always will be.

Not sure who wrote this but it is true:
When you see you are nothing, this is wisdom.
When you see you are everything, this is love.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


Or the "Big Bang" never actually happend.......
Except, at least, in the mind of transitory beings living on a transitory ball of dirt revolving around a transitory star that believe everything *read the totality of the universe it's self* must be transitory as well. Reasonable conclusion I guess. Reality? Maybe, maybe not.
edit on 26-7-2011 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 04:57 PM
link   
There could have been a large explosion, but not necessarily the explosion that created the universe - I would imagine that the universe is timeless and infinite, and it is only with the reference of our time-scaled perspectives that we perceive a universe to have a beginning and and end.



posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 07:52 AM
link   
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


I think this man has heard you Smithjustinb!! And he answers you beautifully.
youtu.be...

Namaste.



posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


I think this man has heard you Smithjustinb!! And he answers you beautifully.
youtu.be...

Namaste.


lmao that dude was f'n crazy. Interesting perspective. Interesting opinion.

You know what, I agree. Awareness is the source of all that is. It is the actuator. It is here with us always and always will be and is unbounded except for when we focus it into a lesser awareness, but even then, it is just our brain's ability and capacity for interacting with unbounded awareness.

But what is awareness aware of is my question to you.


edit on 27-7-2011 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


There is only that.
Watch the video again, and then again and if you still ask the question 'what is awareness aware of', then watch it again.



posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 05:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


There is only that.
Watch the video again, and then again and if you still ask the question 'what is awareness aware of', then watch it again.


It didn't say anything about infinity/nothing.



posted on Jul, 29 2011 @ 03:57 AM
link   
reply to post by smith justin
 


I know you said nothing about nothing and infinity, however you did ask 'what is awareness aware of'?
There is not more than one. What is happening is not something and something. What is happening is happening, there is no happening and 'me', or happening and something aware of the happening. Life happens and you are happening at the same time, not separately. The experience and the experiencer are one. Experience can not arise without the experiencer and the experiencer can not be without the experience. It comes complete, whole. So you are aware of awareness and you are awareness itself. The answer is you as presence.
There is just that.
It is called many names like Being, Awareness, Consciousness, Experience, This, Isness, Suchness, Life, Presence you could call it everything or nothing but it is not both because it can not be separated.
It is separated by the mind to play games, word games. Poetry is what all the words are.
Life is very hard when the poetry is confused with fact, with the idea that if we put the words in the right order then we can solve the puzzle. The solution to the puzzle is it is not a puzzle.
It is art.

Try this video:
youtu.be...

edit on 29-7-2011 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-7-2011 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2011 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Itisnowagain
 


Thanks. I enjoyed the video. Very enlightening.



posted on Jul, 29 2011 @ 03:08 PM
link   
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


You are very welcome.

Namaste.



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by smithjustinb
 


Basically, you logically debunked the concept of the existence of infinity. Congratulations. You're right. Infinity does not exist.

Here's how it breaks down.

Once nothing became defined, that definition emerged as a conceptual - which does exist as actual - something. In fact, that definition's occurrence (and it did occur or there'd be no definition to refer to if it didn't) was the very first instance of change - the first-ever event - which launched the initial event trajectory, and established the eternal Informational Continuum, as that event became the very first fact (an informational unit collective), which was immediately followed by the second-ever fact - that an occurrence (event) causes information (fact of that occurrence having occurred) to emerge as a existential something in direct response to the existence of that occurrence.

So, in essence, when the truth of the absence of anything was defined as the existence of nothing, nothing became a conceptual something and the void ceased to exist forever. That definition was accomplished by the absolute (meaning unaffected by context - internal or relative) truth via absolute (again, meaning unaffected by context - internal or relative) logic, which is how all truth (absolute and/or relative) is established regardless of environment (relative truth) or lack of environment (absolute truth). Reality is what we call the contextual environment, and the foundational "real" immediately emerged when that first-ever occurrence (the definition of nothing as a conceptual something) caused the eternal fact of its occurrence to become existent.

And this is how everything that exists came into existence. As far as how this universe came into existence, there are likely a variety of means to bring a sub-environment like this one into existence. Some natural, and some intentional. It would take stepping outside of this universe and chatting with witnesses (or possibly the initiator itself - if there is one) to get an accurate determination. Anything else would be pure speculation, since the evidence suggests that there is more than one plausible possibility.



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 01:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by NorEaster
reply to post by smithjustinb
 



So, in essence, when the truth of the absence of anything was defined as the existence of nothing, nothing became a conceptual something and the void ceased to exist forever. That definition was accomplished by the absolute (meaning unaffected by context - internal or relative) truth via absolute (again, meaning unaffected by context - internal or relative) logic, which is how all truth (absolute and/or relative) is established regardless of environment (relative truth) or lack of environment (absolute truth).


In a world of nothing, the only absolute is nothing. Who or what then, was there to define the absence of anything as the existence of nothing and with what as a reference?



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 02:47 PM
link   
Good post however....
*facepalm* A Keypoint of this is the sabbath day and keeping it holy.... Man can't something ever be proposed that isn't related to god/religion?



posted on Aug, 6 2011 @ 08:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by thedeadwalkk
Good post however....
*facepalm* A Keypoint of this is the sabbath day and keeping it holy.... Man can't something ever be proposed that isn't related to god/religion?


That was meant to be a joke.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join