Murdoch's refuse summons, page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times

Topic started on 14-7-2011 @ 09:24 AM by stoptheinsanity2012

www.reuters.com...

if these #ers can do it, why can't we.

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 09:38 AM by woodwardjnr

Originally posted by stoptheinsanity2012
www.reuters.com...

if these #ers can do it, why can't we.

Because the Murdochs are not British citizens, despite owning a large chunk of our media.

I know your new round here, but, you should try and make a little more effort with your threads. You know you can take some text from the main article and post it in the EX-TEXT icon. Not trying to bash your thread just a little advice.

edit on 14-7-2011 by woodwardjnr because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 09:57 AM by galactictuan

It's interesting that 9/11 is now connected with the Phone hacking scandal.

What possible motive could Murdoch have for finding information on deceased 9/11 victims?

Perhaps to ensure the job was done?

Makes you think ey...

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 10:02 AM by stoptheinsanity2012

Originally posted by woodwardjnr

Originally posted by stoptheinsanity2012
www.reuters.com...

if these #ers can do it, why can't we.

Because the Murdochs are not British citizens, despite owning a large chunk of our media.

I know your new round here, but, you should try and make a little more effort with your threads. You know you can take some text from the main article and post it in the EX-TEXT icon. Not trying to bash your thread just a little advice.
edit on 14-7-2011 by woodwardjnr because: (no reason given)

but Assange isn't a British citizen either is he? and yea, ill eventually get around to putting more into my threads and learning the icons and embedding, but the link is there if people aren't too lazy to click it.

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 10:16 AM by kyledb13

Ugh I hope they get him. Anyone with that much power and influence should be investigated if their motivations and means of acquisition are suspect. (Side Note: OP, the title of your thread should read Murdochs not Murdoch's because there are two of them)
'

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 10:33 AM by lecaro

Drag his ass in there by his hair... the few strands he has left... take that back... by his old person ears... Drag him in there by his old floppy ears.

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 10:52 AM by woodwardjnr

reply to post by stoptheinsanity2012

Assange hasn't been summoned to a parliament inquiry. The Murdochs have only been invited to attend. Brooks must attend as she is a British citizen. Would have been good to see one of the Murdochs take some tough questions, but they probably dont fancy being exposed to the British people, well not if they dont have to.

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 12:32 PM by Knobby

Seems that they have had a change of heart.

Phone hacking: Rupert and James Murdoch make Commons U-turn

reply posted on 14-7-2011 @ 02:52 PM by 13th Zodiac

Originally posted by stoptheinsanity2012
www.reuters.com...

if these #ers can do it, why can't we.

Ah you can,Black's Law Dictionary,the word Summons can be surplanted by the word invitation.Anyone can reject a invitation.This is law,people really should know how to use it,it's a bloody joke system.Buy a copy, the best investment youll ever make.

Pages: ^^TOP^^