People don't actually believe in Mother Goose, but we don't see them starting threads and bashing and hating on mother goose do we?
It must be that human thing, (poor oppressed, selfish me syndrome) they have...

Originally posted by Sahabi
reply to post by AQuestion
Does not the Book of Job illustrate that Satan asks permission from God before he does what he does? How can we reconcile this?
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by randyvs
Dear randyvs,
I have not read all of the witnesses posts; however, based on your statements and the fact that the witness can respond to them, I make a tentative finding in your favor. The witness cannot claim to be both a atheist and then say that Satan may have a defense. The only out is for him to say that there is a Satan and no God ever existed, in which case he cannot claim that God is bad and Satan good. I do however disagree with your requested punishment, instead I say his words, all of them, will live on forever so that others will know of his insincerity. So it is written, so it shall be.![]()
Originally posted by Sahabi
reply to post by AQuestion
Satan asked God's permission to tempt and afflict Job with 'misfortune' in a bet to see if God's faithful servant would backslide. God signed off on it and gave His approval.
If Satan is evil, why did he ask God first, then why did God allow it?
If Satan is guilty by tempting even though he didn't actually make us do anything, would that make God guilty also as Satan's accomplice?
Originally posted by davidsewell
reply to post by AQuestion
Thank you for your respectful response, AQuestion. I'm not sensitive to posts, just more of a daily lurker. I sometimes post on the "other" forum known to be full of morans, but find that on ATS, there at least is the semblance of real dialogue. And I really don't have the time for it, the GF gets mad!!!
As per your post and to continue to use the number analogy, I think prior to any first cause there is a zero/infinite existing simultaneously. However, with the first mover/cause/thought, the divide is not from one to two but three. It's like there are two parts, but the third part divides them and is required for them to form/exist. And the source of that thought is the divide, almost reflected back on itself.
I guess this allows me to view something in creation that is more than the sum of its parts. Again these are only personal feelings...numbers and words often are insufficient to portray true meaning. It's like they approach the idea but never quite get there!!!
*the GF is away with her mom on vacation, so....edit on 14-7-2011 by davidsewell because: added *