reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Personally I think the twine is irrelevant, whilst some people may assume that this is supposed to be Bigfoot's nesting site or whatever that has
little or nothing to do with the figure on the ridge. If you watch the analysis you will see the person standing where the alledged Bigfoot stood, and
remember the analysis footage was shot from the same area as the original footage, there is a marked difference between the researcher and the figure
in the original video. Also due to the light matrixing of the footage, what we are seeing is not a 100% acurate outine of the figure, the light behind
the figure distorts the real outline, however it does not obscure the size of the figure, which in my opinion, along with the length of the arms, is
the real issue.