It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Partygirl
At this point I'd almost rather be barefoot and pregant that folding shirts at the GAP...at least I'd have a lovely child to look forward too, lol. And the tiles in the kitchen are cool on the bare feet in the hot summer.
I think we need to reevaluate the knee-jerk response that "job is always better for a woman than a traditional family role." Because right now I'm not seeing it.
Originally posted by pstrron
his begs the question; where will it all end? The fact is, it has opened the door for all manor of non-standard "marriages". Wither one likes it or not no longer applies as the line has been crossed. For all those that want to claim equal rights, just remember, the woman that wants to marry her dog or the man that wants to marry a ewe will claim "equal rights". The polygamist now can claim "equal rights" under discriminatory law.
Originally posted by Observer99
But no critical analysis is done, no weighing of pros and cons, no examining the consequences and asking if we need to adjust our path. It's heresy for anyone to say "maybe we shouldn't have 'liberated' women?" even citing the drawbacks. Any public figure would be crucified for even suggesting it.
Originally posted by arbitrarygeneraiist
reply to post by Partygirl
I figured as much. Which means that they'd have to find a better argument to make in support of polygamy, because they couldn't logically use the concept of equality with those types of stringent regulations and religious beliefs imposed upon the concept.
Originally posted by Partygirl
The only people left who support polygamy are FLDS