reply to post by MrWendal
Its not a fox news poll. its a pew poll. Fox just covered the story, i couldn't find it covered else where.
As to the "are you kidding" remark, actually in my area a muslim father killed his daughter recently in a prescribed "honor killing" after she was
caught having sex with her boyfriend because she "dishonored the family name". Its happened quite a few times actually. And to the rest of the post,
all of this is carried out in muslim countries, and this is what it will be like if the Jihad succeeds. Im glad you think its funny, as it seems
people really are just testing me now.
To Kro32 it seems like you really want my answer. I honestly don't know what would be the answer and I don't think any one thing would be. Sometimes
protests are heard by the gov. sometimes there not. Right now in the USA things haven't really progressed to the point of having anything to protest
about, although we have protests in LA all the time where thousands of muslims protest for rule under sharia law. How about a protest to never
implement sharia law? as for politicians I thought that would be kind of obvious because we could make sure to elect politicians in the future who are
not going to give in to sharia law etc, not electing politicians who would want to give muslims sharia law courts. As for the right here and now,
educate everyone on the fact that Jihad is in effect and to not let it proceed, the outcomes if it were to etc.
To my.mind.is.mine
That doesn't explain whatsoever the fact why 1 in 4 muslims under 30 in america think suicide bombing is just dandy. are you one of those 1 in 4?
theres a one in four chance you are. Suicides not okay yet in other countries (non muslim) half think its just fine? i mean c'mon... theres 1.6
billion muslims in the world and to even go as low as 1% that want to physically fight for the jihad thats an army of 16 MILLION.. thats even on the
low estimate so EITHER WAY 16 MILLION is definatley a number to be worried about, wouldn't you say?
as to the other poster above who quoted bible verses i never said the bible didn't have violent verses. it does, but it also says to lie in wait to
kill is sinful, to murder is to sin. The first verse is talking about a very select group of people on a certain occasion, the children of isreal,
when god commanded them to take over the city as they had become incredibly sinful. He even gave them a chance and said sin no more and your city will
be saved. will they sinned their butts off and got owned. The second verse is completely out of context and is talking about evil people and what they
are so evil they will do, so to make sure that you keep your children close to protect them. its a warning so idk what you thought was so bad about
that. The third, is referring to taking back a city that was wrongfully taken from them in which the people were doing incredibly heinous acts. The
bible specifically states that no killing is right, ever. It also never states to kill whole groups of people like the qua'raan does just because of
their beliefs.. BIG difference. Apparently killing is justified quite a bit in the quaraan.
edit on 12-7-2011 by iBleedSovietR3D because: (no
reason given)
