Are Yahoo Answers and Atheist Nexus biased against theists?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 10-7-2011 @ 09:17 PM by Pachomius
I hope that this thread owing to its topic is not deleted because this site is about conspiracy.

Anyway, if it is deleted then I am philosophical about it.


I have the hobby of joining atheist forums or not exactly atheist forums (but where atheists flock to) and I do meet with bias from such forums or something similar like a forum, for example, the Wikipedia (but this encyclopedia is subject to everyone's edits and the most stubborn win) and the Yahoo Answers service.

Pardon me, but that is my impression and in some instances I do have very solid experiences from my own part and to my chagrin if nothing else.

In just within 24 hours time I met with biased treatment from two such services in the web, I refer to the Yahoo Answers and the Atheist Nexus.

First the Yahoo Answers.

Some months back I have had my questions at least one which was almost instantly deleted, and I suspect it is because of the trend in that question and its elaboration being an exposition of the flaws in atheists' arguments against God.

Then yesterday and earlier it happened again, not once but twice.

I submitted a question and its elaboration about the proof from evidence of God's existence and it got deleted right away, but I was able to save the contribution before it got deleted.

Then yesterday by way of curiosity as I found out that there is a section where Yahoo Answers also accepts questions about Yahoo Answers itself, I submitted the question why that earlier question was deleted, that question came out and I was following up with additional edits, then suddenly the screen returned that message that Yahoo Answers was not available for the time being, etc.

So I sent them a message to ask them or to suggest to them to review their deletion policy.

No, I have not gone to my email inbox to find out whether they answered my suggestion, but on previous occasions I have learned that all such correspondence ended with silence from their part in the end.

Now, about Atheist Nexus.

I also submit questions to Ask the Atheists, but I am not happy that they don't give people a chance to submit follow-up comments.

However I noticed that there is an associated Atheist Nexus which is a forum, and there is a sign-up link.

So I signed up successfully and got my membership activated, only then at this point I had to still fill up some questionnaire, so I stated that I am a theist.

Down the questionnaire it turns out that this forum is exclusively for atheists only, and anyone not atheist or nontheist will be taken out, i.e., banned immediately and no explanation whatsoever.

So, I cancelled the webpage questionnaire, even though I thought I was being truly honest to state that I am a theist, but in joining I just want to find out what are atheists about and up to.

Anyway, I sent them also a email using the contact link to tell them to put on top their webpages in big conspicuous words: "No theists allowed here," so that people will not be investing time and labor to sign up and then to come to the notice that they will be banned right away without explanation once it has become known that they are theists.

About forums which are not intentionally atheist meaning founded and operated to advance the cause of atheists, I have come across members who tell me that in such forums atheists would succeed to land themselves in positions of admins or mods, so that they can control the forum to their own desires.


What do posters say here in this Abovetopsecret forum, you have also such an impression in regard to Yahoo Answers and also Atheist Nexus?

If this thread gets deleted I can only be philosophical.

I am still a member of a non-explicitly atheist forum and had a post deleted completely and without explanation, because (my impression) it had a trend toward explaining how atheists' attitudes are not rational, and no amount of request for that post to be restored, with the founder and owner of the forum could get me anywhere, at least that notice be given for the deletion and why, no not even that; so my conclusion was then that the person who deleted that post was pretty powerful with the owner/founder of the forum -- that forum is a very popular one on paranormal phenomena.


Well, if this thread is deleted and without notice and explanation, I cannot be otherwise than just keep philosophical.



Pachomius


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 03:40 AM by wmd_2008
reply to post by Pachomius



Man created god if you think that is wrong I can show evidence !

Religion like Politics is a job creation scheme for its officials!!!!!

Its about power over the underclass below them!


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 01:39 PM by ExistentialNightmare
reply to post by eNumbra



I completely disagree, the argument is always valid; especially in an age of opportunism - where people will take advantage of people's fears, of people's wishes and of people's money.

Even now we are repeating Epicurean arguments and even the philosophy of Socrates (and Plato); but they are still relevant and still worthy of repeating for those who could potentially fall victim to such modern cults as Scientology.

Especially when people are being subjected to Evangelical childhoods; there needs to be another voice that they can hear; instead of people remaining quiet, and letting people be subjected to narrow-minded worldviews.
edit on 11-7-2011 by ExistentialNightmare because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 01:43 PM by thenewguy1987
reply to post by Pachomius



My question is why are you posting a question on Yahoo Answers if you were ready to provide an answer? That seems like a misuse of the service and the reason it would be deleted.

And an organisation that has the word "Atheist" in it's title is probably on the side of Atheists, that's common sense.


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 01:46 PM by eNumbra
Originally posted by ExistentialNightmare
reply to
post by eNumbra



I completely disagree, the argument is always valid; especially in an age of opportunism - where people will take advantage of people's fears, of people's wishes and of people's money.

Even now we are repeating Epicurean arguments and even the philosophy of Socrates (and Plato); but they are still relevant and still worthy of repeating for those who could potentially fall victim to such modern cults as Scientology.

Especially when people are being subjected to Evangelical childhoods; there needs to be another voice that they can hear; instead of people remaining quiet, and letting people be subjected to narrow-minded worldviews.
edit on 11-7-2011 by ExistentialNightmare because: (no reason given)
closed minded people arguing with closed minded people doesn't do anything but start wars.

The arguments are not nor are they ever valid and rarely have I ever seen anything said by either side in a theists v atheists thread that would make me want to be more like either group of poeple.

(warning harsh opinion follows: not directed at anyone here)
I feel those that ARGUE over religion to be the lamest of fools. Every belief system is inherently the same with some slight differences in the details and it remains the largest divide the world knows. All to answer a question nobody can by definition know the answer to.


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 01:54 PM by ExistentialNightmare
reply to post by eNumbra



Atheism is a lack of belief; Atheism makes no positive claims alone; That's up to individual atheists.

Agnostic Atheism is an open minded position that states there currently isn't sufficient evidence to warrant a belief in a deity. Should the evidence be provided; an atheist who values truth should be willing to renounce his or her atheism.

That's open minded. I disagree with your "close-minded vs close-minded" statement.

Of course there are individual Atheists that declare there is no God; but they have no evidence for this claim either.

The burden of proof is on the person making the positive claim. The argumentum ad ignorantiam is fallacious; I can't prove unicorns don't exist; but does that mean they nessasarily exist?
edit on 11-7-2011 by ExistentialNightmare because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-7-2011 @ 12:50 AM by Serafine
reply to post by ExistentialNightmare


Originally posted by ExistentialNightmare
reply to post by eNumbra



Atheism is a lack of belief; Atheism makes no positive claims alone; That's up to individual atheists.

Agnostic Atheism is an open minded position that states there currently isn't sufficient evidence to warrant a belief in a deity. Should the evidence be provided; an atheist who values truth should be willing to renounce his or her atheism.


Agnosticism and Atheism are two different things. I wonder if that's a point in the OPs original posts ( arguments ) in Yahoo and for A Nex.... ? As far as burden of proof... there is no required proof for a logical fallacy. Atheism doesn't include an Axiom such as "I don't know" ( which Agnosticism does )....

and Atheism is in no way a "lack" of belief... it is in a fact "A Belief", granted by virtue of the use of will... which is another topic indeed!!!!
edit on 2011/7/12 by Serafine because: error



reply posted on 12-7-2011 @ 10:53 AM by ExistentialNightmare
reply to post by Serafine



Agnosticism/Gnosticism - What you know (or don't know)
Theism/Atheism - What you believe (or don't believe)

Agnostic Theism i.e. "I believe there is a God"
Gnostic Theism - i.e. "There is a God!"

Agnostic Atheism - i.e. "I believe there is no God"
Gnostic Atheism - i.e "God (or a specific God) does not exist"

What you're referring to is Possibilianism

I understand Carl Sagans comments regarding Agnosticism ("absence of evidence is not evidence of absense")

But does that mean unicorns or spagettis monsters should be believed to be true because we can't prove it not to be true?
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The Truth About the Garden of Eden Story
  Posted 8 days ago with 49 member flags
The Mormon Church is a Cult
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags
Google Earth proves Muhammad-Islam
  Posted 2 days ago with 23 member flags
Where is the gospel of jesus?
  Posted 3 days ago with 18 member flags
Who killed the prophet Muhammad? A 1400 year old murder mystery.
  Posted 17 days ago with 16 member flags
Quake Reveals Day of Jesus\' Crucifixion
  Posted 4 days ago with 12 member flags
The talk too controversial for TED to post...
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags