What Are We Capable Of - THIS IS ANONYMOUS!, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 155 times


reply posted on 10-7-2011 @ 10:17 AM by Acetradamus
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to
post by quedup



I just did in a previous post. It is MY OPINION (stress that) that Anon is nothing more than a sham ued to provide a reason for further draconian rules and regs on the internet.

In 1939, Hitler used a sham partisan attack to allow his army into Poland, uder the guise ofproviding safety and security to the polish people. We see how THAT turned out.



*sigh* ...did you also learn in class what poland did do prior to that? Of course Hitler false flagged them, but what happened prior to that in the economic sector?.tberefor the comparison does not work anymore..

furthermore...
rather do nothing then do something?duh..



reply posted on 10-7-2011 @ 10:44 AM by Sly1one
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Anon is an e-terrorist organization bent on deterring internet freedom and force Obama to use his Internet Kill switch

I hate these people


This just needs to be repeated. Anon will give the administration ALL the ammo it needs to enforce draconian rule on the internet.


Actually if you think about analyze your own logic on this you might find that you are thinking about this all wrong.

First, why would you "hate" or "dislike" people who fight to expand freedom by hindering those who are KNOWN to suppress freedoms (TPTB)?? Its not the actions of ANON you all hate its the predictable SOLUTION or RESPONCE by TPTB that you hate and dislike...Its the solution to ANON that makes you hate ANON...That makes no sense...hate the people coming up with the asinine "solutions" to really what amounts to "THEIR PROBLEM" not necessarily yours...

Second, does anyone here honestly think there is a way to send a message and create change within the institutions and governments and power structures of the world that DOESN"T involve some form of something that will inspire a SOLUTION or RESPONCE by those very same powers that you will end up disliking?

really think about the options WE THE PEOPLE have to bring about change...now think of the RESPONCES to those OPTIONS by TPTB...

I guess what I’m trying to illustrate here is that anything outside of INEFFECTIVE PEACEFULL PROTEST will be met with some form of RESPONCE or SOLUTION by TPTB that will in the end limit your ability to say "NO" and they will dress it all up in some form of "terrorism" whether it be internet or riots or militias and homegrown dissidents or alciada...etc...it will always appear your freedoms are eroding because of RADICALS and EXTREMISTS whose isolated actions are enough to warrant ridiculous solutions such as an "internet kill switch" or "war in ____stan" or TSA security checks in airports, then trains, then city busses, then school busses, then normal roadside checks etc...

Lastly, its not the people fighting the TPTB that you hate...its the SOLUTIONS and RESPONCES of TPTB to those people/groups that you hate. Always remember that...


reply posted on 10-7-2011 @ 11:42 AM by Wrath5639
reply to post by Sly1one



Actually, I didnt know that. Guess that answers that.
Thanks for the info.


Regards,
W.


reply posted on 10-7-2011 @ 11:48 AM by Sly1one
Originally posted by Wrath5639
reply to
post by Sly1one



Actually, I didnt know that. Guess that answers that.
Thanks for the info.


Regards,
W.



Hughes, Chris R., Co-founder, Facebook
Bilderberg Attendees

So your not just taking my word for it...

edit to add:

Alexander, Keith B., Commander, USCYBERCOM; Director, National Security Agency

was there as well...and im not implying anything that isn't already implied by its own nature...
edit on 10-7-2011 by Sly1one because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 10-7-2011 @ 11:49 AM by mr-lizard
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by Nobama
reply to
post by beezzer



Again, this "killswitch" would be used for other reasons, I'd rather have a group trying to change something, than people that sit around echoing the silly propaganda spewed out by the Media.


Try this analogy. I don't want police in my town. So in order to get rid of the police, I'm going to rob stores, hurt people, break things so the police will go away.

Anon is provoking law enforcement to enact more laws, not less.


Or another way of looking at it - Imagine there was once a town that had no trouble, no disorder and suddenly censorship and strict rules start spreading from house to house. People who are suspected of something are now blocked from accessing certain areas, whilst everyone else is suddenly treated like a criminal by the new enforcement officers.

The people of this town get angry, they start turning the rules onto the corrup officers and law enforcement, by using the very tools they wish to protect.

I think my example is a much clearer picture of what is occuring.


reply posted on 10-7-2011 @ 11:53 AM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by ModernAcademia



You bought right in didn't you?
They are terrorists? Where'd you learn that one?
Why are you afraid a group might cause you to lose liberties (which they wont the internet is safe, not like it would affect your blogging, and emailing if they did because there is no such thing as a killswitch) yet say nothing when the government is actively taking them.

Do you people realize there is no internet kill switch? And if there was why are you afraid of it rather than praying for it to be "flipped?" OH nevermind, because you are planning on doing nothing when it is "flipped" that's why you are afraid..

Get real guys.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^