It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by soficrow
It amazes me that people are questioning these elders perceptions. And disgusts me too.
The Inuit are NOT offering any 'scientific' explanations - just their observations. Ignore them at your own peril.
It's not a matter of questioning perspectives. It's a matter of questioning the conclusion that their observations have anything to do with the Earth's axis. And they don't. The Inuit elders may have noticed a change in the apparent location of the sunset but the Earth's rotational axis hasn't shifted.
a warming northern atmosphere has actually altered the visual landscape of the Arctic, which has caused the sun, moon and stars to appear out of position in the sky. An optical tilt of the earth caused by refraction rather than a physical one!
…In 52 years, the sun has shifted southward by 19 KM, which is a 44 degree movement relative to the position of the observer. This is an example of the massive visual shift that elders across the north have observed, leading them to each conclude that the earth has tilted.
Originally posted by soficrow
Again, whatever "explanations" might be offered, ignore the Inuit observations at your own peril.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by soficrow
Again, whatever "explanations" might be offered, ignore the Inuit observations at your own peril.
The sun's true position IS normal.
…Any anomaly observed by the inuit must either be due to faulty observation or atmospheric factors.
Originally posted by soficrow
If so, then why are "atmospheric factors" changing the Arctic environment so dramatically? Why are the "atmospheric effects" at the North Pole so very different now than in the past? Why is it happening, now, and never before in the Inuit's oral history? What does it mean?
In the next place, Gerrit de Veer states explicitly that he and two of his companions "saw the edge of the sun" on the 24th of January, and that on the 27th of that month they "all went forth and saw the sunne in his full round-nesse a little above the horizon"; and again, that on 31st they "went out and saw the sunne shine cleare"; and lastly, on the 8th of February, they "saw the sun rise south-east, and went down south south-west." On the intervening days, the weather being cloudy or otherwise unfavorable, they had no opportunity of observing the sun.
As for why the Inuit have never noticed this phenomenon before... why they never noticed it before now is actually of little concern to me.
Originally posted by soficrow
Hmm. Sounds rather disrespectful and presumptious on your part. You must be very young. …Do you have an equal disregard for all ancient cultures?
a warming northern atmosphere has actually altered the visual landscape of the Arctic, which has caused the sun, moon and stars to appear out of position in the sky. An optical tilt of the earth caused by refraction rather than a physical one!
…In 52 years, the sun has shifted southward by 19 KM, which is a 44 degree movement relative to the position of the observer. This is an example of the massive visual shift that elders across the north have observed, leading them to each conclude that the earth has tilted.
Originally posted by soficrow
reply to post by ngchunter
Many people find it possible to hold with their own discipline while respecting others' perceptions.
The source below acknowledges and respects Inuit perceptions - and explains many as refraction, caused by light bending differently through hot and cold air.
…In 52 years, the sun has shifted southward by 19 KM, which is a 44 degree movement relative to the position of the observer. This is an example of the massive visual shift that elders across the north have observed, leading them to each conclude that the earth has tilted.
Again,
...It might be beneficial to discuss whether or not 'refraction' explains the change in daylight hours (from 1 to 2 hours for hunting), and the observation that the sun is higher overhead (refraction is more relevant at the horizon).
Of course, that would require respect for the Inuit perceptions.
No information is given as to how the observer proved that the observation occurred from the exact same spot 52 years apart.
...to answer your question, yes, abnormally high levels of atmospheric refraction would increase the apparent length of the day; refracting the sun's position higher than it should be can affect both the sunrise and sunset times, hastening sunrise and delaying sunset.