posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 07:28 PM
Yup, I've got a question for him.
In his book "Captured!", he supports the Marjorie Fish misinterpretation of the Betty Hill Starmap as showing Zeta1 and Zeta2 Reticuli. In Betty's
original hand drawing, as published in "The Interrupted Journey" in 1966, the two bodies identified as such actually exhibit crescent phases (like a
crescent moon), which are characteristic of solid bodies, rather than self luminous stars. They have a shaded side, and self-luminous stellar bodies
My question is: How does he explain that discrepancy, which needs to be explained in order to continue supporting the Fish Interpretation.