It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
John Lennon wrote this with contributions from Yoko Ono. It's a highly experimental piece, which Lennon once called "The music of the future." It is the most controversial and bizarre track on the album - you have to have a very open mind to appreciate it.
This helped fuel the "Paul is dead" rumors. If played backwards, you were supposed to hear the car crash where Paul died, and a voice saying "Turn me on, dead man." Also, playing the line, "I'm not in the mood for wearing clothing" in reverse eventually becomes a rather odd but clear reversal, "There were 2, there are none now." This is referencing the rumor that Paul McCartney died in a car with "Lovely Rita" and that the 2 were burned away after the wreck. (thanks, JT - Tullahoma, TN)
Paul McCartney and Beatles producer George Martin hated this and tried to keep it off the album.
Originally posted by MACchine
STAND UP AND FIGHT !!! JOIN IN THE FIGHT AGAINST NIBIRU !!!!!!
At this point MANY may ask, WHAT does God think of ALL THIS ? The following may provide the answer ...
edit on 7-7-2011 by MACchine because: TRUTH
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
reply to post by MACchine
The last video is ridiculous. I say this because if there were a huge hole in the Earth then that obviously means that an astronomical body had hit in that location... but the Lincoln Memorial and Washington Monument somehow survived the impact? Furthermore, the planks were placed in order for people to walk between the two monuments?? I guess even in time of Global Extension crisis, DC still cares about their tourism industry. This was a very interesting thread, but when you come down to it it is all hogwash ( I would like to use a different word, but the terms and conditions prevent me from doing so)
Terrel, you would do well to understand that correlation does not always imply causation. Just because two events happen at the same time does not mean one caused the other. You live on a geologically active planet and thus would be wise to look to more reasonable local causes for natural disaster before jumping to fantastical ones about cover-ups and dwarf stars. Please look into the concept of Occam’s razor.
You would also do well to gain a practical understanding of astronomy before making such wild claims. If Elenin was really an approaching dwarf star then it would be many orders of magnitude brighter than its current 10.4. If you think a dwarf star would be invisible at only 1.82 AU (Elenin’s current distance) then I suggest you do some reading on how very bright such an object at this close range would be. This photo verifies the dim magnitude of Elenin.
Also note that even if you aligned every single planet in the solar system it would still only equal 1.7% of the gravitational force the Moon places upon the Earth. That is a tiny fraction of an already small amount. To claim that Elenin which is much further away from the Earth than the Moon is responsible for natural disasters and yet imply the Moon is not responsible would be absurd. Using your logic, our own Moon should have ripped apart the Earth long ago. After all, if Elenin can cause disaster with only 1.7% of the Moons force then imagine what the remaining 98.3% would do? Obviously this is ridiculous as the Earth is still here.
Greenland’s sunrise was attributed to lower ice from climate change, not fictional dwarf stars. The rest of your comment is conspiracy minded nonsense and not worth further comment. However, I will say this… to require that the Sydney Stargazers must provide an alternative explanation in place of your theory is not justified. An answer of “I don’t know” is valid and not knowing doesn’t automatically make your theory correct. There could just as easily be a 3rd answer.
It astonishes me that when presented with photographic evidence from amateur astronomers – people just like everyone else – the conspiracy crowd still refuses to believe the evidence right in front of their faces. How close minded the conspiracy crowd must be to ignore the evidence and favour the belief.
I have no doubt you’re an intelligent person but you obviously don’t have a practical understanding of astronomy. Go out and use a telescope or better yet join an astronomy club locally. Take time to understand astrophotography and how it works. Take a physics course or listen to a podcast on critical thinking skills. With some practical knowledge under your belt you’ll find that Elenin is actually just a comet and the whole dwarf star theory doesn’t work in reality.
Nut with a Theory said this on June 14, 2011 at 5:43 pm
Now we KNOW why they named it ELEnin and what EXACTLY it stands for EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT NINE !!!!!!
Originally posted by Kliskey
Peoples.... Please stop claiming PROOF.... This is but a theory.
You can claim it proof when its on earths door step (which it never will be ) and IF something happens (which it wont) then early warning means nothing. Extinction is extinction.
Its better to enjoy what you have left than to panic over something you cant prevent/ do anything about.