Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
No, I'm simply offering an idea, a suggestion which is open for debate..........sorry if that was not clear.
And if you really find my suggestion offensive and have no counter ideas move along.
No trolling allowed.
At least I'm trying to figure a way out of this matrix.
Uh-huh. This is what you said in your Opening Post, that I responded to:
Again if you agree, maybe pass this along - if not,move along and go to another more interesting post.
This statement is not unclear nor is it vague. You made it perfectly clear that disagreement was not allowed in this thread. Of course, and if you
have been paying attention the past few years, have plenty to say about your suggestion on how to "fix" Congress, but what would have been the point
of posting my opinions if your intent was to be just another tyrant suppressing dissent? Better, I think, to clear the matter up first.
Now that the matter has been cleared up, let's address your suggestions.
First, and foremost, let's address the overall ideology behind the suggestion to "fix" Congress. The biggest flaw in your belief system is that
belief that Congressmen are above the law:
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
Within that same statement is another flawed ideology, and it is the idea that Congress can "impose" upon the people. Nothing could be further from
the truth. Congress has no Constitutional authority to "impose" upon the people, and whatever acts of legislation they do pass are required to pass
Constitutional muster. This is not to say that the federal government as a whole abides by their Constitutional mandate, but of course why should
they when there enough people who actually believe that Congress has the authority to "impose" upon the people? Which leads to the major flaw in
your suggestion of "fix"ing Congress.
As long as too many people passionately and vehemently argue that there are no such things as unalienable rights and natural law then no amount of
"fix"ing will work. People get the government they deserve, and if enough people are hell bent on doing away with self government in exchange for
tyranny then this is what they will get. Hell, people don't even have to be so passionate and vehement that unalienable rights and natural law are
non existent. Even if all the people were in agreement that all people everywhere have certain unalienable rights and that any denial or
disparagement of these rights is criminal, government - including Congress - would still have a proclivity towards tyranny.
Congress does what they do because the people allow it. There are a few who understand law - real law not legislation acting under color of law - and
who stand mightily tall in the face of tyranny and demand justice, but too many do not want justice and instead want entitlements and privileges, and
are more than willing to sacrifice, not just their own rights, but the rights of everyone in order to gain these privileges. Too many people ignore
the fact that the federal Constitution guarantees to each state a republican form of government. That republic established both federally and state
by state is decidedly anti-democratic in the purest sense of democracy.
Those, which is most, who keep insisting we live in a democracy, either knowingly or tacitly put forth the presumption that the majority, or in some
cases a well oiled minority, can trample all over individual rights if they have enough votes to do so. This is the purpose of establishing a
republic. The republic is in place to prevent the people from voting rights away. It is not lawful in a natural law sense, and certainly not lawful
in a Constitutional sense to trample over individual right(s). No act of legislation, under our Constitutional republic, has the authority to deny or
disparage rights retained by the people.
Of course, and again, my assertions are few and far between the cacophony of the masses who could care less about unalienable rights and just want
their entitlements and privileges. Thus, it is not Congress that needs to be "fix"ed, it is We the People who need fixing. Congress is lawless
because the majority of the people are lawless. Denying and disparaging individual rights has become an American past time.
For those who know better, and more and more are learning the law- because ignorance of the law is no excuse and cannot work as a lawful defense -
they are discovering that their only real option in this insane nation that has embraced a Congress who has gleefully "imposed" more than 600,000
acts of legislation on the people, is non-acquiescence. This non-acquiescence used to be an American past time and embodied the "American Spirit"
but those were different times. Today, spoiled little children at the age of adulthood scream for their entitlements and privileges.
If you truly want to "fix" Congress, let go of the notion that you are "entitled" to Social Security, which is nothing more than a Ponzi Scheme
parading about as legal plunder. Let go of the notion that any act of legislation that comes down the pike is law. Legislation is not law, merely
evidence of law. If all acts of legislation were actually law, the judiciary would not have the power to strike legislation down as unconstitutional.
If all acts of legislation were actually law, the Bill of Rights and any and all Declaration of Rights within State Constitutions would be
meaningless. Of course, too many people passionately and vehemently argue that The Bill of Rights and unalienable rights are meaningless, and therein
lies the problem. A problem that desperately needs to be fixed.