Anon (not) Exposed - [HOAX]

page: 2
66
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Again, I gotta say it.

It doesn't matter which group, or individual, came up with the idea of anonymous, because thats what Anonymous is now. An idea, a movement, a yearning to reinstate freedoms.

The idea will never change - even if the members of the original group do.

You can't infiltrate an idea.

More simply, if it goes against freedom, it is NOT Anonymous.

However, you're free to anonymously go against freedom if you like - thats your freedom




posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
The same can easily be said about every other domain registration privatizer.


and I hope you don't find it off-topic
but I would like to say I feel it an honor
that you would show up and post on page 1
of this thread. That says a lot within itself.
Thanks



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by jude11
GMB: The GMB is a general trade union in the United Kingdom, and has more than 600000 members.
PMR: (actual term) Profound Mental Retardation, a developmental disability. (This would be the humor part)


lh is the interesting one for me. lh.net is a redirect to a cloud computing company that also uses lh.org.

lh.com is of course lufthansa. Haven't considered a relation...yet.



that's the thing,
the acronyms in my theory have
a common denominator meaning all
of them can be tied together.

Yours as listed I have yet to
find one.

but thanks for bringing up the variances that
could be used in the same handle.

star 4 u



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:22 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


First off, thank you for this thread and taking time out of your valuable life as so many do to research this and present it to all of us. I am quite impressed. While I am not sure whether it really sums up to any truth I have had concerns about anons intentions from day one and whether it was a agency driven false flag operation for stricter controls of internet rights and eaves dropping. Something that a good lot of people are also concerned with. I do not support what anon is doing but I have yet to come to any conclusions on what is behind it all. So thanks for throwing this information out here for others to peruse and research further for there own curiosity.




posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by jude11
GMB: The GMB is a general trade union in the United Kingdom, and has more than 600000 members.
PMR: (actual term) Profound Mental Retardation, a developmental disability. (This would be the humor part)


lh is the interesting one for me. lh.net is a redirect to a cloud computing company that also uses lh.org.

lh.com is of course lufthansa. Haven't considered a relation...yet.



that's the thing,
the acronyms in my theory have
a common denominator meaning all
of them can be tied together.

Yours as listed I have yet to
find one.

but thanks for bringing up the variances that
could be used in the same handle.

star 4 u



Actually, I forgot #3


Why would ANON make something so obvious as many people on the net are always looking for hidden codes and messages. ATS?


To tie mine together is a long shot I agree. But who's to say how intelligent their tech gurus are?

Trade Unions would probably love ANON IMO

Mental retardation could be their insult to TPTB.

The cloud computing could be their statement against that which we know is coming for all of us.

Yup, just grasping but gotta question right?

I'd flag ya again if I could.

Thanks



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:27 PM
link   
Boon, that's another thought provoking thread you authored. Thanks for this info as ever.

I knew when I got to the end of the OP that there would be some who would say "Anon isn't/can't be controlled" but since we don't truly know the names and faces behind the group, who's to say that the more politically motivated Anon attacks aren't somehow at least partially influenced by someone in these groups such as Cap Gemini?

I'd honestly believe that half the Anon operations are partially involving these influences while the other half are genuine people who want to attack for a worthy cause but nobody will ever really know the full and true picture.



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by jude11
Why would ANON make something so obvious as many people on the net are always looking for hidden codes and messages. ATS?


I don't think Mr. L made this error.

Mr. L is at the corporate office in New York.

I think one of his onsite interns made the
account at the privacy place, so when
the fax box info came in, he would know
where to send the fax to. I think it was
an error on the local level creating this
descriptive name. Mainly for forwarding
reasons. But once again, it's just my theory


Basically like a forwarding address at the Post Office
except done with faxes instead.



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by curious7
Boon, that's another thought provoking thread you authored. Thanks for this info as ever.

I knew when I got to the end of the OP that there would be some who would say "Anon isn't/can't be controlled" but since we don't truly know the names and faces behind the group, who's to say that the more politically motivated Anon attacks aren't somehow at least partially influenced by someone in these groups such as Cap Gemini?

I'd honestly believe that half the Anon operations are partially involving these influences while the other half are genuine people who want to attack for a worthy cause but nobody will ever really know the full and true picture.


this is the true genius of the plan by TPTB.
They can use Anon as a scapegoat for any op
they want to and can place the blame anywhere
they see fit, say for instance a teen hacker in
Ohio and it can never be traced back to TPTB.
UNLESS .....
you allow an intern to make a mistake and not catch it



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:42 PM
link   
Intriguing.
Impressive deductions.
Plausible.

Your new avatar fits you well. You certainly do have "the nose" for snooping out possible conspiracy angles.
s & f



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alethea
Intriguing. Impressive deductions. Plausible.

Your new avatar fits you well. You certainly do have "the nose" for snooping out possible conspiracy angles.
s & f


Alethea I will take that as a high compliment
coming from you, knowing our history from
the Soros threads. thank you for that

star 4 u



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:51 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Yeah i think youve gone off on a bit of a tangent simply based on your whois info?

I know lots of people who opt out of displaying their personal details via whois.. does that mean that they are CIA operatives? I have a mate who's email address big_gay_al@*******.*** and funnily enough he aint gay... just a huge south park fan.

If you really think you have found a link to something here .. then i suggest you take a break from your computer, go outside and get a breath of fresh air.. clear your mind.. because this is really clutching at straws.

No offense intended..... but this is really a stab in the dark.



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 07:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
Nice work Boon. That is a very interesting angle you got goin on there. Sorry I have nothing to contribute here, but I think it's totally plausible.
Keep up the good work!

........I'm surprised that you did not link this with Soros...............................yet!

thank you


but there is a Soros link as well.

Bayo Oyewole is the lead consultant to the Soros Foundation.
He also consults with Cap Gemini and E&Y.

www.linkedin.com...


no stone unturned no hole too deep

brilliant work as always boon SnF



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by UcDat
no stone unturned no hole too deep
brilliant work as always boon SnF


thanks, but it's still just a theory.
I do not have the resources that active
LEO's have to do the ground work.



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 08:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord

Originally posted by boondock-saint
sometimes you tend to abbreviate which ones you intend to serve what function.

When one anonymously registers a domain name, the name of the Private information service (if selected as an option) is inserted into the domain name WHOIS information by the domain registrar, not the registrant.


unless of course,

it was all pre-arranged !

like that's NOT possible? money talks...always has.

they can set up anything they want, however they want at any time.

stranger things have happened.

I agree, follow the money and .... because it talks loud.



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 08:26 PM
link   
"Whois Privacy Protection Service" is exactly what it states in the name.

A private unaffiliated whois privacy service company that is paid to keep the domain registration private. More than likely this company has the domain's owner information, yet they will not release it to the public. A lawsuit needs to be filed to obtain a subpoena to get the real owner records (civil cases). This is why there are lawsuits with this name in it.

Source: en.wikipedia.org...

Of course this whois information can be falsified to appear to look like a Whois Privacy Protection Service, Yet this particular one is a well known registrar company (eNom) and is legitimate.

Source: www.enom.com...
Source: en.wikipedia.org...

(I'm confirming what SkepticOverlord and jude11 posted.)

I do admire the effort though.


edit on 5-7-2011 by matito because: link



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 08:33 PM
link   
Without anything yet to say...another awesome insight boon...

...where to start?

I think S & F for starters...very nicely done...I don't think you have offended anyone yet!


A bit of research is in order I would say...so off I go!



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by jude11
Why would ANON make something so obvious as many people on the net are always looking for hidden codes and messages. ATS?


I don't think Mr. L made this error.

Mr. L is at the corporate office in New York.

I think one of his onsite interns made the
account at the privacy place, so when
the fax box info came in, he would know
where to send the fax to. I think it was
an error on the local level creating this
descriptive name. Mainly for forwarding
reasons. But once again, it's just my theory


Basically like a forwarding address at the Post Office
except done with faxes instead.





Originally posted by boondock-saint

this is the true genius of the plan by TPTB.
They can use Anon as a scapegoat for any op
they want to and can place the blame anywhere
they see fit, say for instance a teen hacker in
Ohio and it can never be traced back to TPTB.
UNLESS .....
you allow an intern to make a mistake and not catch it




in either case, TPTB don't care at all if someone makes a mid-level "error"...planned or not.

they ALWAYS have a backup plan that ALWAYS works to their advantage.

the end results ALWAYS work in their favor.

these things are planned by the best in the business,

and plus,

how many people like us are really going to find these things and then be "believed" by millions?

is the New York Times running a special edition on this ? of course NOT !

if something gets "out of hand" they simply send in their "socker balls" and dispell and discredit the whole thing.....

all while the plan keeps moving full steam ahead !

they get rich and they keep control .....

the theory - anti/theory tricks have been around for thousands of years !

i like the "Cap Gemini" theory.

the Haliburton theories were around in the 80's.......and it all came true.



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 09:13 PM
link   
Bump...this should be back at the top of the food chain...nobody minds if I bump this up right?

I think a bit of insight does us all good...



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 10:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by jerryznv
Bump...this should be back at the top of the food chain...nobody minds if I bump this up right?
I think a bit of insight does us all good...


hold on to ur knickers Jerry,
the ride is about to get a lil bumpy.
So hold on bro
lol

So what if this is also connected
to 9/11 as well ???

OK, let's start with the connections.

We have already introduced Ernst & Young Cap Gemini
into the thread.

So let's introduce Lewis Ross who was director at
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young during 9/11 and also
VP of Chase Bank as well as President of XB5
Partners.


XB5 Partners is a senior-level NYC IT and management consultancy providing services to mid-range to Fortune 500 companies. Michael Drapkin, CEO, is also chair of eCommerce Management of Columbia University's Executive IT Management program and a former senior technologist for Avalanche and Razorfish. Lewis Ross, president, is a former director of Cap Gemini, a vice president and director at EDS and vice president of Chase/Chemical Bank. Ilene Anderson, partner, is a former partner at Ernst & Young and former regional manager for Deloitte & Touche.


www.drapkintechnology.com...

also another link confirming Ross' status at Cap Gemini
www.linkedin.com...

Also notice Ilene Anderson is a former partner and Ernst & Young
which has already merged with Cap Gemini by the time 9/11 happened.

2 members of XB5 Partners have ties to Cap Gemini and E&Y.

Now you ask, why is this significant ???
here ya go.

Guess who got the contract to replenish the IT
infrastructure after the WTC fell ???

you guessed it, XB5 Partners


Original Press Release
XB5 launches "World Trade Center I.T. Mobilization" consortium


www.drapkintechnology.com...

This XB5 was called upon the replenish IT infrastructure from
WTC devastation.

And it's same partners, Ernst & Young and Cap Gemini
might have ties to Anon which might cause them to also get
the Internet Censorship Gov contract as well ???

Is this only a coincidence that they might be involved in both the
after events of 9/11 and after events of internet censorship ???

hmmmmm, does history repeat itself ???

u do the math,
I can only show you the door

edit on 7/5/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 11:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by dario86
Anonymous does not represent one man or corporation.
There's no clear structure or leadership in Anonymous.
True. Or is it? We know this because this is what we have been fed... by the media and by anon themselves. So do we really know who/what they are and what their real intent is? It's an interesting game of chess. Time will tell. Maybe.




new topics
top topics
 
66
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join