posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 04:37 PM
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
Originally posted by celimonster
I don't believe she's guilty.
NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED.
I, as an American believe in the "Innocent until proven guilty"
You are an American idiot if you do not believe she is guilty. The forensic evidence alone proved it without any doubt.
Really? The forensic evidence proved it? Perhaps you should have presented the prosecution with this proof. If you had proof of her guilt and
didn't share it, you are just as guilty.
In reality, there was no proof.
-People Magazine, Star, National Enquirer are not proof.
Casey may indeed be a sick girl, or even a horrible person. Sadly, neither has
anything to do with convicting her. In order to do that, the prosecution had to show beyond a reasonable doubt that Casey murdered her daughter.
They did not do that. Like the papers and everyone in this thread, they merely alluded to its possibility.
edit on 10-7-2011 by spinalremain
because: (no reason given)
edit on 10-7-2011 by spinalremain because: (no reason given)