F-35 - Past, Present ... Future?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 01:25 AM by thebozeian
reply to post by RichardPrice

Isn't this just typical Richard,

The very thing we have been warned about with both the general program cost issue and the (now) lack of competition for the engine, and before the F-136 is even cold in it's grave, the sole remaining engine cost goes supersonic. At over $40M a pop I could almost buy some 4th gen aircraft for the price of the B model engine. In fact for that amount per airframe the USMC could probably do a tear down and rebuild of their current AV-8B's and get another 15-20 years out of them, helped by the thoughtful British taxpayer who provided 72 late model perfectly good Harriers for parts. With this kind of insanity maybe we deserve our collective fate?


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 04:53 AM by RichardPrice
Originally posted by thebozeian
reply to
post by RichardPrice

Isn't this just typical Richard,

The very thing we have been warned about with both the general program cost issue and the (now) lack of competition for the engine, and before the F-136 is even cold in it's grave, the sole remaining engine cost goes supersonic. At over $40M a pop I could almost buy some 4th gen aircraft for the price of the B model engine. In fact for that amount per airframe the USMC could probably do a tear down and rebuild of their current AV-8B's and get another 15-20 years out of them, helped by the thoughtful British taxpayer who provided 72 late model perfectly good Harriers for parts. With this kind of insanity maybe we deserve our collective fate?



Just a note, which actually serves to make the point in your post a heck of a lot more apt, but the price is $130million PER ENGINE - the contract is $390M for three engines

You could pick up two Tranche 2 Eurofighters for the cost of one engine.


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 05:39 AM by thebozeian
reply to post by RichardPrice

Holy crap Richard!

I had a quick look at the link you provided but didn't realise that was what it was saying. Mate I might have disagreed or argued with you in the past about a couple of things but on this Im 150% behind you, that is INSANE! I think I speak for both of us when I say, "What arse h*le signed off on this piece of delusion?", because we both know our respective countries may subsidize this. For years to come. Lets design our own aircraft now, it cant be any worse.



reply posted on 4-3-2012 @ 02:24 PM by nobodysavedme
reply to post by jensy



why not just keep producing refined versions of the F 14 AND F-15 for sea missions?



These aircraft are affordable and are proven to work.


For land the F-16 or preferably the F-16 XL and the F-18 are very good.

are proven.

seriously we really don't need all this stupid maneoverings and fancy cobra stunt aircraft.

nowadays you fire missiles.

you use a fire and forget missile from 50 to 100 miles and are home for teatime.

all this stupid dogfighting nonsense is movie stuff.

the isrealies proved this when they shot down 75 syrian aircraft in that war a decade ago using F-16 without actually seeing the syrians visually.


all we need is large numbers of aircraft instead stupid F-15 which is going to cost 300 million a piece and 10% has been tested and can only carry 2000 pounds and very poor range.


reply posted on 19-3-2012 @ 06:08 AM by jensy
reply to post by nobodysavedme



1) F-16 is a great lightweight fighter but outclassed by most modern combat aircraft.

2) F-15 doesn't cost $300m but can't operate from carriers and the F-14 has been shredded to stop the Iranians buying up the pieces so neither of them is a solution.

You are quite right that firing missiles BVR (beyond visible range) is the way that air-to-air combat is fought, but in order to come off safely with the increasingly small air-forces that western nations are fielding, you need something special to survive (i.e stealth, countermeasures, great maneuverability).

My biggest issue with the F-35 is its lack of a twin engines / two seats. A $150m+ aircraft should not be relying on a single pilot or engine.

Jensy


reply posted on 26-3-2012 @ 03:54 PM by nobodysavedme
reply to post by LizardFromOz





you are right.

which moron is gonna waste time doing the fancy cobra stunts or loop the loop when you have all aspect air to air missiles which you fire from beyond visual range.


the specs for these planes are beyond stupid and not required.

remember that day when the air force using f-16 downed 75 syrian migs fighters in a single day without any of these stupid dog fighting stunts just using better missiles and raders and computers.


they detected,locked on,fired and were on their way home before the first air to air missile hit the syrian mig.



many of these plane specifiers are living in ww2 times in their ancient mental state.they all need to be sacked.

the vast amounts being on air platforms is criminal....and becoming unfordable.


reply posted on 27-3-2012 @ 12:56 AM by slanteye
reply to post by ZIVONIC


Manufacturing of high tech products in the US and UK can only get more expensive. In any high income nation it is impossible to keep production cost low. You can build factories in other 3rd world countries producing the components for the plane and have it compartmentalised so that it remains top secret but that would mean no jobs for Americans and British workers. High tech factories cannot sustain a growing population when the factory itself is fully automated and only needs about a hundred people to operate it. You need labour intensive factories like in China to provide more people with jobs. Jobless people are like "idle mind ...devil's workshop"
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Amazing video of 747 lifting in place in extreme wind conditions
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
Stealth chopper based in Nevada
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
  Posted 16 days ago with 2 member flags
My CAF (Canadian armed forces) friend and his work on the TRS-2
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags