What is a 9/11 "Conspiracy Theorist"?

reply to post by psikeyhackr

I can figure out the obvious from the fact that skyscrapers must hold themselves up.

How is it you can figure things out without data but no one else can? Are you smarter than everyone else?

So the data is not required to figure out how the buildings collapsed, correct? Then why do you insist that everyone else needs data that you don't?

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psikeyhackr

 

I can figure out the obvious from the fact that skyscrapers must hold themselves up.

How is it you can figure things out without data but no one else can? Are you smarter than everyone else?

So the data is not required to figure out how the buildings collapsed, correct? Then why do you insist that everyone else needs data that you don't?

That "no one else can" is just nonsense from you.

I didn't write this:

911research.wtc7.net...

or this:

911research.wtc7.net...

The south tower came down less than one hour after impact. But there had to be enough steel on the 81st level of the south tower to support another 29 stories. And steel conducts so the heat would be conducted away. So why doesn't everyone want to know the amount of steel on every level withing 5 stories of the south tower impact. So many people not asking so obvious a question is really suspicious.

Once you start thinking in terms of the improbability of the collapse and concentrate on what a 1300 foot skyscraper has to do to hold itself up IT IS OBVIOUS. But if you choose to BELIEVE that it can collapse then it is not to difficult to rationalize. But accurate data tends to get in the way of rationalization. So rationalization tends to not be very scientific.

So all you can come up with is, How dare you not think what EVERYBODY ELSE thinks! What do you think you are SMARTER THAN EVERYONE ELSE?

Idiotic psychological CRAP.

psik

reply to post by psikeyhackr


"Group Think" is all the rage on ATS.

"Critical Think" is nonexistent.

Originally posted by psikeyhackr
.
.
.
And steel conducts so the heat would be conducted away.
.
.
.
psik

Your logic would imply that steel framed skyscrapers would not require fire-resistant coatings be applied to their frames, since any heat from fire would be conducted away before any damage could occur. This is not the case. Care to explain this discrepancy between your logic and the real world, PSIK?

FYI

Originally posted by psikeyhackr
But there had to be enough steel on the 81st level of the south tower to support another 29 stories.

How do you compensate for the fact that the mass above was falling, as is perfectly evident from the video evidence? As knowledgeable as you are concerning physics, you know that the force generated by a falling mass impacting a structure can be many times as great as that of a dead load of equal mass. Not only that, but (being very knowledgable of structural engineering and design) you know that sudden impact loads can cause more stress on a structure than an equivalent force applied gradually.

So how do you go about figuring all this out?

Tell us all about it.

_BoneZ_

Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Damn near everything contains sulfur. Anything plastic/synthetic will most likelt made from petroleum, which contains sulfur. Drywall contains sulfur.

You didn't watch the video of Professional Engineer Jonathan Cole. He burned all of that stuff with steel. He let it burn all day and night. No signs of sulfur were found on the steel.

His tests also confirmed that the use of thermitic materials on steel turned the steel into exactly what FEMA found in their metallurgical analysis, both physically and chemically.

Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Stupid truthers

And do you think anyone will take anything you say seriously with your childish ad-hominem attacks? Perhaps you missed this:

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord:

if you're unable to communicate these issues in a deserving manner, then you are not concerned about the issues at all, you're simply entertaining yourself through insults and you're not welcome here.

Source

If you can't discuss this topic like an adult, then stop wasting forum space and bandwidth. Nobody likes to see kindergarteners calling others childish names.

Its fairly obvious the "rapid responders" to any 9-11 threads parroting the Govt line are
some of the paid bloggers of one of the alphabet agencies.

6 of the 10 9-11 commissioners themselves admit there is a cover up.

Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane, and the film 9-11 press for truth shows
a laundry list of lies and cover ups associated with 9-11.

Most of the world who has looked deeply at the evidence knows 9-11 was a lie,
and the ppl who rabidly post against it online are sock puppets for Israel or
the ppl in our Govt who helped make it happen.

The dancing Israeli's on 9-11 knew it was going to happen and were there to document it.

Firefighters in the video in my signature saw steel in liquid form weeks after the
towers fell and that is only possible by something like Thermite.

I will take the word of the Firefighters who were actually there over some
Govt shill or some paid blogger on ATS that is a disinfo agent.

Our Govt sold out to Israel and to other Plutocrats for various reasons, old news...

They wanted a new pearl harbor as the PNAC document said so they made one.