Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psikeyhackr
I can figure out the obvious from the fact that skyscrapers must hold themselves up.
How is it you can figure things out without data
but no one else can? Are you smarter than everyone else?
So the data is not required to figure out how the buildings collapsed, correct? Then why do you insist that everyone else needs data that you don't?
That "no one else can" is just nonsense from you.
I didn't write this:
911research.wtc7.net...
or this:
911research.wtc7.net...
The south tower came down less than one hour after impact. But there had to be enough steel on the 81st level of the south tower to support another
29 stories. And steel conducts so the heat would be conducted away. So why doesn't everyone want to know the amount of steel on every level withing
5 stories of the south tower impact. So many people not asking so obvious a question is really suspicious.
Once you start thinking in terms of the improbability of the collapse and concentrate on what a 1300 foot skyscraper has to do to hold itself up IT IS
OBVIOUS. But if you choose to BELIEVE that it can collapse then it is not to difficult to rationalize. But accurate data tends to get in the way of
rationalization. So rationalization tends to not be very scientific.
So all you can come up with is, How dare you not think what EVERYBODY ELSE thinks! What do you think you are SMARTER THAN EVERYONE ELSE?
Idiotic psychological CRAP.
psik
