It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I don't care what the MSM reports...US Eq's are getting bigger. Period!

page: 2
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 4 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by vesta
 



Indeed.. been 7 in texas alone that were over 2.0 this year so far,, ..
What gets me is the recent change in the magnitude scale. and the way they are reported.. ?

So 5 years ago a 5.0 would be only reported as a 4.0 now days..




posted on Jul, 4 2011 @ 10:53 PM
link   
reply to post by vesta
 


Very interesting article you posted. Its always good when the media gives a variety of ideas and terms to follow up on rather than just saying what it wasn't. Lots to investigate now. Big smile.



posted on Jul, 5 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
Just to further my thought on this. I have heard so many people stating that it'll never happen or even not for another 100 yrs or so. Well, I still don't buy it. This is a shot at 4:52 Eastern Time from quakes.globalincidentmap.com...




posted on Jul, 6 2011 @ 10:18 PM
link   
reply to post by jude11
 


I am currently trying to watch this youyube from dutsinse (cruddy internet, 1/2 way done after 2 whole hours!
)

www.youtube.com...

Very similar to what you are saying I think. I think his info backs up what you are saying.

Dutchsinse (website dutchsinse.com)



posted on Jul, 6 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by tinker9917
reply to post by jude11
 


I am currently trying to watch this youyube from dutsinse (cruddy internet, 1/2 way done after 2 whole hours!
)

www.youtube.com...

Very similar to what you are saying I think. I think his info backs up what you are saying.

Dutchsinse (website dutchsinse.com)


Thanx,

I'll post it for you:




posted on Jul, 6 2011 @ 11:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 

I'm not sure where you got those figures from, they seem awfully low. I ran a rectangular area search that roughly covers California and got these numbers (2.0+ through July 3).

2000 674
2001 595
2002 523
2003 609
2004 667
2005 507
2006 484
2007 452
2008 840
2009 853
2010 2286
2011 371
Last year was pretty busy (April-June was busy) and sort of messes up the average but this year seems pretty normal.

If we kick up the minimum to 4.0 it looks like this:
2000 44
2001 39
2002 29
2003 48
2004 37
2005 40
2006 28
2007 28
2008 54
2009 41
2010 191
2011 27

5.0:
2000 1
2001 5
2002 1
2003 2
2004 7
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 9
2009 6
2010 8
2011 2


earthquake.usgs.gov...

edit on 7/6/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 6 2011 @ 11:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Yeah I think the circular radius wasn't big enough.

I spent too much time on getting the links to work and didn't look at the numbers close enough.

Clearly they're too low.



posted on Jul, 12 2011 @ 08:26 AM
link   
reply to post by jude11
 


Well Christchurch (New Zealand) quakes have certainly ramped up the activity ever since September 2010.annual earthquake graph since 2007


I'm unable to find any yearly earthquake data on Japan. Does someone know of any links for that info?



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join