It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The HOLY GRAIL and the "PURGE"

page: 4
16
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:14 AM
link   
reply to post by undo
 


I never said it was white "christian" women but yes I think it is white women.

I can't be fully sure but the evidence I have found seems to show this.

You think something is a metaphor, I however think it was definitely NOT.

I will continue with the evidence shortly.




posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:18 AM
link   
p.s. didn't you mention the "stargate" movie had hints too? i mean your reluctance to discuss this with me on the pretense that i haven't read it, is mind boggling. i assume you think i haven't read it because i'm not agreeing to accept that the person getting vampirized becomes eternal because she lives off the chemicals from the dragon, or whatever. but that's not what i'm seeing there. what i'm seeing is a bunch of females being cannabalized since that's about the gist of the same examples in history. ya know, big pits full of sacrificial victims?



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:25 AM
link   
Holy crap. Here we go.



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by IndieA
Holy crap. Here we go.


you read it, yes? did you see her hinting around that it was white women, and that the white women were offspring of satan? and that they were bred for the purpose of having sex with the gods? i smell a set up here. that's why i'm all over it like cheese on crackers.



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:35 AM
link   
"But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them – bringing swift destruction on themselves.

Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping"

- Second Epistle of Peter.

that pretty much sums up the non-sense and garbage and lies you are spewing.



edit on 3-7-2011 by randomname because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:40 AM
link   
The Vatican shows evidence of their knowledge of what is REALLY the go, by what they have in their court yard.

A giant pine cone, well known to represent the pineal gland which is why it was named after it.

The pine cone at the Vatican in Rome ...



Back in the days of Pompeii, man was not so ignorant, it has taken many witch hunts and rewritings of the truth to get man to his vulnerable ignorant state of today ... where silly people think things were metaphors for example and that ancient people were silly for worshiped Gods Phallus with huge obelisks for no apparent reason what-so-ever except that they were stupid?

Take for example this image found in Pompeii, it shows a snake very much like a probe and a pine cone it is consuming ... ignorant ... NOT ... people in the past knew the truth.

Why I wonder would the Vatican have a huge pine cone and phallus in their court yard?

I think it is very obvious they are not telling us the whole truth.



Below is an Image of the Vatican court yard showing the huge Obelisk.

The Catholic Church is not ignorant ... they KNOW the truth ... it is the masses, the mere peasants they rule over who don't.










edit on 3-7-2011 by AprilSky because: video did not show up



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by randomname
"But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them – bringing swift destruction on themselves.

Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping"

- Second Epistle of Peter.

that pretty sums up the non sense and garbage and lies you are spewing.


edit on 3-7-2011 by randomname because: (no reason given)


and the bulk of the incidences she's referring to, predate the epistles and yeshua, too. there are so many mischaracterizations and mistakes per square inch of text in her theory, i don't even know where to start first, and the problem is, even when i do start, she refuses to listen and insists i'm spamming her thread. and i haven't even gotten to all the things in the verses surrounding the verses she's pulled out, that suggest her theories are wrong. i offered to show her what i was referring to, to help her decide where she might need to adjust her thoughts on it, but she's not interested.



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:44 AM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 

Please learn to read your Bible, Jesus is indeed the Morning Star, while Satan is called the "son of the morning" in Isaiah in reference to him before he rebelled in the KJV, which is the true preserved Word of God in the English language. Every other reference to Satan in the scriptures shows him to be the polar opposite of Jesus Christ. Blinded by your pride, you have been deceived and self deluded into actually believing the satanic gnostic doctrine. Luke 8:10 And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand. As you can see Jesus foresaw people like you twisting the scriptures and a great example was your theory on the Living Water. If you really actually read the Word instead of taking single verses out of context while being spoon fed by Dan Brown, your eyes might be opened. Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,"



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:46 AM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 


the obelisk came AFTER the flood. i keep telling you, they deliberately misinterpreted the pre flood data. for example, the sumerian-akkadian texts indicate that abzu was a thing, not a person. the babylonian texts indicate the abzu is a person who is in a relationship with another "thing" called tiamat, who is mischaracterized in babylonian texts as a woman who is mated with abzu. abzu dies, so she mates with kingu. (see enuma elish as the first example of how the whole problem started. these were originally THINGS, objects, not living beings. they were perhaps operated by living beings, but were not themselves, living beings.

look at what comes out of tiamat after she mates with kingu instead. all kinds of alien type creatures emerge. you're supposed to think she's literally giving birth to them because enuma elish is a hatchet job. marduk tries to lay claim to all the exploits of the "gods" that came before the flood. it's clearly a hatchet job.



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 02:48 AM
link   
Man chooses to believe what he wants to believe ..

One can lead a horse to water but can not make him drink ...

As Jesus said ...

1 Corinthians 3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

Ie ... I lied to you because you can't HANDLE the TRUTH !!!

I wonder why it would be that Jesus told his apostles there is a secret mystery to the parables and that others were not allowed to know what it was?

Why would the bible make it perfectly clear Jesus is in fact Lucifer?

Why would the bible let you know he is a blood line by letting you know he came BEFORE Abraham? .

And confirming in writing ... twice at least ... that he couldn't possibly have been alive walking the planet 2,000 years ago and point out that his father was Joesph in Mathew chapter one ???

Because one day we were SUPPOSED to work it out ... the truth was always meant to come out in the end!


edit on 3-7-2011 by AprilSky because: added some content[



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 03:17 AM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 

The Vatican is nothing more than paganism with a Christian veneer and are wolves in sheep's clothing. Their doctrines are heretical as they have no reverence for the Gospel or Jesus Christ, because if they did they would actually follow his commandments rather than worship idols and surround themselves in pagan symbology. You will know them by their fruits, and that's all that has to be said to expose them.



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by hxc408
 


it's weird, but i dunno how many times i've asked people who claimed the catholic rituals were proof that christianity is a lie, to show me WHERE in the biblical text, the rituals in question were listed? they aren't there! but they insist, all of the bible and jesus, is a lie because catholcism practices pagan rituals. i don't get the logic of that. that's like saying, because some sect of islam has practices that aren't in the koran, that must mean all of islam is false and so is koran. it's the most oft repeated and flimiest argument against the bible i've witnessed and it's used ALL the time.

reminds me of the argument that son of god is the same thing as sun god in egyptian stories. yet the hieroglyphic and the hieratic forms of these words are nothing alike and don't mean the same things, either. it's just willful insistence to believe stuff that simply isn't true.
edit on 3-7-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 03:31 AM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 


I think you should have posted this in the rant forum, I lost the will to live and lapsed into a coma after the first 10 pages of scripture.

I can see a lot of effort when into your article though, just too biblical for me.



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 03:34 AM
link   
jesus tells the pharisees who are harrassing him that they are from the synagogue of satan. and he's not telling them they are being kind guys in his bloodline. he's criticizing their behavior and claming they are from the synagogue of satan in the verse as an insult, an accusation. now why would satan criticize his own men by pointing out they are his own men? and why would they take it as an insult if they were his own men? where's the LOGIC?
edit on 3-7-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 04:10 AM
link   
reply to post by undo
 


The logic is ...the ELITE LIED to you ... got you to believe in lies!

Seriously can't you read or something.

The bible even lets you know it is rubbish and what the truth really is ...read more carefully ... I spelt it out for you. Found you the verses which expose the truth!

The bible is control of the Masses ... lies and deceit ... there is your logic!!! .

They give you little snip-its of the truth ... why would the bible say Jesus lives 2,000 years ago and then make it perfectly obvious he did NOT?

What the hell does it take for you people to WAKE UP !!!!



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 04:13 AM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 

Because Jesus existed before the foundations of the world if you read the beginning of the Gospel of John. And because he said to his apostles he only gave them milk is because they were not ready to be told the deeper mysteries of God, which in no way makes him a liar. If you read your Bible once again the apostles were always plagued with doubt despite the many miracles they saw performed before their eyes, and if they had trouble believing what they saw with their own eyes how could they believe the deeper revelations of God? The milk is used as a metaphor for a baby. A newborn can not digest meat but must first be nursed on milk. Before Christ went to the cross he promised not to leave them comfortless, and they would receive the Holy Spirit which would bring all things Christ did in remembrance as well as show them further revelations of God's truth which is the meat he was alluding to. As they matured in their faith, the more that was revealed to them via the Holy Spirit after Christ's ascension. So your claim that Christ ever lied has literally no ground to stand on, and there is never one place in the Bible that likens Satan to Jesus Christ. In revelations it says that Jesus Christ will defeat that old serpent, which is Satan. So how can they be the same when it clearly says they will be at war and Christ will defeat Satan? This being one example of the many in the Bible. It seems clear to me, you are not at all after the truth, rather you are serving your ego because you willing to believe any text or idea no matter how ridiculous, example being Angels and Demons. Simply because you refuse to serve a righteous God and turn from your sinful ways. Pride goeth before a fall, just ask your father Satan.
edit on 3-7-2011 by hxc408 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 04:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by undo
 


The logic is ...the ELITE LIED to you ... got you to believe in lies!

Seriously can't you read or something.

The bible even lets you know it is rubbish and what the truth really is ...read more carefully ... I spelt it out for you. Found you the verses which expose the truth!

The bible is control of the Masses ... lies and deceit ... there is your logic!!! .

They give you little snip-its of the truth ... why would the bible say Jesus lives 2,000 years ago and then make it perfectly obvious he did NOT?

What the hell does it take for you people to WAKE UP !!!!


okay, let's start over because we clearly have a problem with communication here.
i've forwarded the theory that the post flood sex and sacrifice thing was a mischaracterization of pre flood texts, deliberately forwarded in early babylon. they got away with this because most of ancient sumer wasn't even found under eight feet of flood silt till about 100 years ago. that means for at 2 millenia people believed that pre flood reality was about sacrificing women and babies to the gods and opening magick portals was only possible via elaborate sex rituals. black holes/portals are not magick. wormholes are not magick. they are real, physical, scientifically defined, non-personal THINGS, not men's penises or women's crotches or various other bodily orifices.

as far as it being a deliberate lie, tell me how you find it possible to quote one verse and leave the rest? under what delusion are you currently operating that would make you firmly believe that it's good scholarship to take ONE verse out of an entire chapter, and call the rest of it a lie. do you know how easy it is to manipulate information in that way? i could take one sentence out of your op and design an entire theory based on just that one sentence. do you see the problem here? where are you getting your confidence on its correctness? certainly not from the text? if the text is a lie, why are you using the text? wouldn't that just be more lies?
edit on 3-7-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 04:41 AM
link   
reply to post by undo
 


Listen carefully because this is probably the last post I will make here ...

I came to deposit this TRUTH and that is all...

The PARABLES are literal ... they speak of a blood line to be harvested!!!

That is the mystery of the PARABLES.

The bible is truth ... it is just not truth how you think it is!

Before very much longer the HARVEST will occur and people will say "Oh I never saw that coming" how come? well ... they TOLD you all about it!!!!

Yes millions will be purged and hundreds of thousands harvested.

OK I have told you, now re-read what I have written and you know what I told you here years ago on my other threads

... I have TOLD you now ... you my job is DONE !!!




edit on 3-7-2011 by AprilSky because: missed word



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 04:47 AM
link   
revelation chapter 12 about the woman with the moon under her feet ... here, these verses

1And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:

2And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.

3And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.

4And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

5And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

6And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.

7And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
---------------------

so according to your theory, the verses are a snippit of truth until which point? what do you do with verses 7 and 8? toss them out?

i can tell you what that is, it's a calendar of events based on a chart of the precession of the equinoxes. it indicates time frame. the great red dragon is the constellation draco. it's a northern circumpolar constellation. every 1/3rd of precession, the dragon's tail encompasses a third of the precessional cycle and the stars inside the scoop of its tail (which contains ursa minor "the scoop") are the 1/3rd cast to earth because it's a sped up time chart. like watching the precession of the equinoxes in fast forward video, it would seem as if draco is dumping the stars in the scoop of its tail onto the surface of the earth. this is a calendar for timeframe. not a sex ritual.

here it is



edit on 3-7-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 05:10 AM
link   
Your message contains no truth whatsoever and you have even acknowledged that you are being manipulated by these so called evil reptilians, so why should anyone believe anything you say. You even ignore evidence that others provide, because you're only here to spread your message of doom & gloom.
I would be very surprised if any rational human being believes anything you say.


edit on 3-7-2011 by kindred because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join