Impeach Obama?! New vid lays out a pretty good case., page 2

You're absolutely correct.

Remember when they were doing all these things to lower the requirements of The Constitution, and we all thought it was for The Governator (Arnold) ?

Then by some "Twist of Fate", Obama is in the catbird seat.

I wasn't aware of the Supreme Court's complicity in this OP, but I supposed it could have been assumed.

For those on limited bandwidth or time, the first and last minutes are just logos and can be skipped.

Definitely worth your time to watch and listen! Thanks, OP.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 07:52 AM by Master_007

"Sure America got played but hey if you can impeach him and try him and his for treason your one up on the rest of us..."

Yes well hows that then when they control both parties, the justice system, the police, media, army.

ffs the attack on Libya is not a war according to obama and congress say the war is ilegal but here the money is anyway to keep up the attack.

be honest, silly you thought we had a democracy and you're post went missing when they sent you a voting slip to ask if you agreed to war number 5.

We are now on war number 6 and war 7,8,9,10 will start the day after another 9/11 style false flag attack regardless of where dip stick was born.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 08:01 AM by Flint2011

reply to post by UcDat

While I am no defender of Obama overall and can't stand the man as our president he is still the commander-in-chief/President Of The United States Of America. I mean no disrespect but what happened to people in the USA when it comes to debating policy verses bashing a man in office. Rather than impeachment, there should be more exploratory investigations directed at the concerns out US citizens if it's a majority concern. Most of that video is pure propaganda in my view. I find no hard evidence other than speculation and conjecture to merit that video as truth. People need to get back to the absolute truth. Ask the tough questions of course but stick to the evidence.

Anyways, thanks for sharing just the same. I still respect you efforts either way.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 09:50 AM by dillweed

reply to post by Flint2011

Up until recent times we knew almost everything about our presidential candidates. What do we know about Barry Soetoro? Zip, zero, nada nuthin', because the msm want it that way. I've been hearing for years what a genius he is, but not one person who knew him when has ever been heard from. What about his grades? They call him a 'law professor' when he was at best a substitute teacher. I challenge one of you BO supporters to show me ONE person who went to school and sat in class with this fraud, let alone one who will say he's a 'genius'.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:06 AM by Senteri

Originally posted by dillweed
I challenge one of you BO supporters to show me ONE person who went to school and sat in class with this fraud, let alone one who will say he's a 'genius'.

Who is Barry Soetoro?

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:12 AM by Youmakemewonder

Originally posted by Scoriada
reply to post by spoor

Source? Links? anything?

Oh wow!
Those all came from your source from your link, Eagle eye.

Originally posted by spoor
You left these out from your Wiki link....

Birthers are a riot. Literally.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:16 AM by Scoriada

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by Scoriada
Yes activist judges have watered down the true meaning of 'Natural Born Citizen"

Some apparently only want a white man to be president!
edit on 2-7-2011 by spoor because: (no reason given)

Oh, you're one of those. Nevermind I thought I was dealing with a rational person.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:25 AM by Iamonlyhuman

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by UcDat
even having seen the vid

What video? There was no video when I posted - and as the constitution was not changed, nor was anything changed Obama remains the legal President, no matter how much you hate that fact.

Then maybe you should have waited to post until you watched the video. Your point that nothing was changed is the whole reason why Obama is not a legal president. The attempts to change the constitution were made in order to make him a legal president. They did not pass, so he is illegal. Get it?? From the video:

From 2003 – 2008, members of Congress feverishly worked to eliminate Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution requiring that all presidential candidates be natural born citizens. Starting in 2003, Democrat members of congress made no less than 8 attempts, in 22 months. to either eliminate the natural born requirement or redefine natural born citizen. Note that each attempt to eliminate or redefine the natural born clause goes to the elimination of the requirement that the president is born to two legitimate American citizens.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:28 AM by Senteri

reply to post by Iamonlyhuman

Unless that video proves he is not a natural born citizen it does not sound like it matters what anyone tried and failed to do before he was elected.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:28 AM by Iamonlyhuman

Originally posted by Flint2011
I find no hard evidence other than speculation and conjecture to merit that video as truth. People need to get back to the absolute truth. Ask the tough questions of course but stick to the evidence.

You don't think that the Library of Congress' congressional record is hard evidence?

Conjecture?

From 2003 – 2008, members of Congress feverishly worked to eliminate Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution requiring that all presidential candidates be natural born citizens. Starting in 2003, Democrat members of congress made no less than 8 attempts, in 22 months. to either eliminate the natural born requirement or redefine natural born citizen. Note that each attempt to eliminate or redefine the natural born clause goes to the elimination of the requirement that the president is born to two legitimate American citizens.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:31 AM by Iamonlyhuman

Originally posted by Senteri
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman

Unless that video proves he is not a natural born citizen it does not sound like it matters what anyone tried and failed to do before he was elected.

Why do you think that their attempts were to eliminate or redefine the natural born clause goes to the elimination of the requirement that the president is born to two legitimate American citizens?

Hmmm.... maybe because they knew, as we know now and commonly accept as fact that Obama's father is not / was not an American citizen??

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:31 AM by Senteri

Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
You don't think that the Library of Congress' congressional record is hard evidence?

Conjecture?

Where is the link?
Your quote sources back to a blog.
JB Williams

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:32 AM by syrinx high priest

they mave get the votes in the house, but won't have them in the senate

moot point really

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:33 AM by Senteri

Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
Why do you think that their attempts were to eliminate or redefine the natural born clause goes to the elimination of the requirement that the president is born to two legitimate American citizens?

Even if that were anyone's intention that would not prove one thing about Obama.

Hmmm.... maybe because they knew, as we know now and commonly accept as fact that Obama's father is not / was not an American citizen??

We all knew Obama's father was not a citizen.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:34 AM by Iamonlyhuman

Originally posted by spoor
if that baby was born in the USA then it could become president.

Why did certain people in congress feel the need to redefine natural born citizen then?

Each attempt (outlined in the video) to eliminate or redefine the natural born clause went to the elimination of the requirement that the president is born to two legitimate American citizens.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:36 AM by Youmakemewonder

reply to post by Iamonlyhuman

Where is that requirement now?
I think you just made that one up.

reply posted on 2-7-2011 @ 10:37 AM by Iamonlyhuman

Originally posted by Senteri

Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
You don't think that the Library of Congress' congressional record is hard evidence?

Conjecture?

Where is the link?
Your quote sources back to a blog.
JB Williams

I didn't link to anything, must have me confused with someone else. Here's the Library of Congress link, I wish I could link the individual bills but the website doesn't allow you to. You have to search using the individual bills' numbers.

Library of Congress

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 >> ^^TOP^^