reply to post by bookmandh2
I am replying to your thread because I think you are thinking correctly, but with some differences and nuances that I would like to share with
First off, yes, I think this could be a false flag, but it is a multifaceted false flag with many different purposes being shown to us and yet it also
conceals federal government lies and deceives the public. It also shows that there is much more to what we are seeing than what we are being told.
Second item about thinking they are trying to clear out the area is also something I agree with, but I also think it is being done to shut down major
national highways, bridges, rail lines and in effect, isolates the area from any mobility by conventional wheeled or tracked vehicles.
Third item is about your thoughts that ceasing to be a target because of radiation and flooding is a thought that while I will admit I can understand
why you would think this, I on the other hand will have to say on this matter that perhaps it could be, but I really don't know.
My thoughts then go to the idea that by producing major changes to the area by flooding and by nuclear reactor site concerns, it serves to long term
impede any conventional attack or for that matter it prevents the ability of anyone to properly respond or attack to such an area without having to
contend with floods and radiation.
Flooding and radiation could create a dead zone that would have to be avoided, but when one thinks that perhaps this is a false flag, you have to then
try to see or understand what's in it for them.
Recently I watched a video about how the flooding has impacted road systems and rail lines and how certain bridges are now contributing to being cut
off from easy access. Having to travel 100miles or more to go around is a definite obstruction to impeding any logistical tail that would accompany
any invading army.
It is this small point that started me thinking that this was a false flag that serves to do many things,but with the flooding and radiation, it
serves mostly to impede an attacking enemy from taking and holding ground. It is a grand move on the battle chess board and that is why flooding and
radiation serve to impede any invaders.
Water and radiation serve to impede all soldiers and by doing so, it could signal that an enemy attack is known or suspected and what we are seeing
with all the intentional flooding and how that flooding then caused nuclear radiation problems is being done to begin the national self defense
measures that need to be taken now to negate their future invasion attack of the USA main land.
Anyway, there you have it. while my theory is built upon the same items you have touched upon,but I see them in a different way and I hope that as
conspiracies go, that you consider my thoughts on the matter as well. It is in the spirit of sharing thoughts on a subject matter that we both find
intriguing and subject to question and further investigation. Thanks again.
Here is a link to a video showing how the flooding has impacted the roads systems, bridges and how far reaching the flooding has become. It is long
video, but I feel because it is very current that it will show you and others why when I watched it, it forced me to realize that no one is going to
be able to travel through the area and that area is very large.
So large an area is being flooded is what made me realize that it possibly serves as an early national self defense measure that would impede an
invading army from being effective in their mission to occupy and control certain food producing areas or physical assets in the USA after some
conventional nuclear strikes.
Enjoy the video link to what the flooding looks like on a national level.