It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ghost375
What would be interesting is if it discovered any of the Luke, John, Mark, Matthew texts were written by different authors.
Originally posted by Ghost375
What would be interesting is if it discovered any of the Luke, John, Mark, Matthew texts were written by different authors.
Originally posted by Ghost375
What would be interesting is if it discovered any of the Luke, John, Mark, Matthew texts were written by different authors.
I have a feeling the fundamentals would just deny it just like evolution.
I'm gonna have to read the comments of this on Fox News...Fox News always has great comments filled with derogatory names for liberals. I can only imagine what they are saying on this story.
Looks like they're just ignoring that story.edit on 30-6-2011 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
i wonder if they are using original texts ?
i thought there were no "originals".......
the Vatican may have some old copies laying around.
the rumor is that the Roman scribes and scholars wrote and re-wrote and re-wrote like crazy.
who wrote the latest version ?
Originally posted by boondock-saint
The new software analyzes style and word choices to distinguish parts of a single text written by different authors, and when applied to the Bible its algorithm teased out distinct writerly voices in the holy book.
The program, part of a sub-field of artificial intelligence studies known as authorship attribution, has a range of potential applications -- from helping law enforcement to developing new computer programs for writers. But the Bible provided a tempting test case for the algorithm's creators.
Ok, I admit, I was a lil taken back by this story. What would subjecting this type scrutiny to
the Bible do for those who want to prove the Bible a hoax ???
The places in which the program disagreed with accepted scholarship might prove interesting leads for scholars. The first chapter of Genesis, for example, is usually thought to have been written by the "priestly" author, but the software indicated it was not.
The differences "have the potential to generate fruitful discussion among scholars," said Michael Segal of Hebrew University's Bible Department, who was not involved in the project.
How long will it be before technology will prove the Bible and/or religion a hoax ??? Will this software aid
in that process ???
Originally posted by boondock-saint
a very valid point worth mentioning.
What database of words and phrases
did they use to compare against if there
were no originals ???
maybe I need to go to seminary college just
to understand this stuff.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by babybunnies
I think you missed the point in the article.
Meaning the computer program thought
that multiple authors wrote in the same book.
a cabal maybe ???
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by boondock-saint
yea.. it's foxnews..
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
If there were two Isaiah authors then Jesus lied.
I can't accept that.