It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How do you figure I'm the one in desperation here?
I'm asking why you seem to think this doesn't apply to you.
Because you don't understand how the damage occured to a cab, it means there is some conspiracy afoot?
This claim has already been shown to be false. The object on the video footage was not only blurry as it was at a distance, the ticket pylon in the foreground was obstructing the view of the object so you cannot even accurately determine the size of the object even if the image was blurry.
I invite you to prove me wrong.
The cab does raise a lot of questions. The damage to the base of the poles is conclusive proof of tampering.
Originally posted by kwakakev
The cab does raise a lot of questions. The damage to the base of the poles is conclusive proof of tampering.
There are two cameras that captured the event, one has a pylon in the way and the other does not. I am not aware how what the cameras captured was shown to be false. I know you have dismissed them as too hard or lack of experience to comment.
1/ Camera showing small aircraft approach pentagon, not a 757.
2/ Lack of debris when first responders on scene, then debris in later shots.
3/ Piece of debris with 'c' on it in position out of line of sight from impact point.
4/ Poles brought down by plasma / oxy cutter or some other high temperature device.
5/ Lack of seats in wreckage, still waiting...
I know you have presented some debate about these issues, but not enough for me to to say I am wrong yet.
As you can see from the remains of the windshield hanging down over the steering wheel, the pole DID come through the windshield, and from the extensive damage from the dashboard being torn off and pushed downs it's clear there's much more extensive damage than what your imaginary guy running out into traffic with a sledgehammer would be able to accomplish.
The lightpole fell from the passenger side so this necessarily means the passenger side would have been damaged too (the passenger side window looks like a big chunk of glass is missing), but that's entirely moot as the extensive interior damage shows your entire argument to be moot.
You conspiracy people keep insisting "pics, or it didn't happen". Here you have a pic, so therefore it did happen.
So, now you're in a dilemma of choosing between having to retract your abject paranoia, or having to denounce the very conspiracy websites you're getting all your information from. Which will it be?
In one moment you say that you admit you do not have experience in light pole maintenance to diagnose proof of tampering, and in the next you say you're saying conclusive proof of tampering, which necessarily requires experience in light pole maintenance. One statement or the other must logically be incorrect.
Your nonexperience in traffic pole maintenance has no bearing on the camera footage. I have shown you that the object you're claiming to be too small is of limited value because the object in question is out of focus and I have shown you animation which explains many of the objections you claim you have. Your insisting that the object is too small to be a 757 when we can't discern what the object even is, is a spurious argument.
Google Video Link |
Big chunk of glass missing from front passenger side door? Hardy, har, har! Where is the glass on the passenger side seat from the shattered window on the passenger side door? Oh yeah, I have the answer for you, someone vacuumed it up prior to the photo.
What is your explanation for this fdr recovered at the Pentagon holding the information that it does ?
Just a further thought on Lloyd's cab. Does it not seem odd to you that this damaged cab is still in his possession ? Pretty sloppy of these otherwise super genius perps to leave evidence like that around when forensic examination could provide a "smoking gun" (according to truthers anyway).
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
You didn't succeeed in steering the discussion away from having to address this in that last thread so it should come as no surprise to you that you're unable to steer the discussion away from having to address this in this thread.
The high quality flight simulators can record to FRD. As for the previous flights, either replay them or just cut and paste as it is just data.
Originally posted by kwakakev
reply to post by Alfie1
The high quality flight simulators can record to FRD. As for the previous flights, either replay them or just cut and paste as it is just data.
Haven't you ever driven a damaged car home? You brush the glass off the seat and put on glasses and enjoy the breeze. Why is it so sinister to not see glass on the seat?
And like the gentleman said if the car is part of some big conspiracy why didn't the FBI confiscate it. They could have done so days or weeks after the even and no one would have questioned it. But it's still at his home 10 years later? The smoking gun has been sitting in his back yard for ten years? That's a good one.
No wonder the whole truther movement resides only in cyberspace.
And you are of course introducing another raft of experts into your ever expanding "inside job". Why do you suppose flight simulator technicians and flight data recorder experts would join together in a plot to murder thousands of fellow citizens and remain forever silent ?
Outside of conspiracy site speculation can you offer any evidence at all to support your suggestion ? Has anyone ever done it ?
And you are of course introducing another raft of experts into your ever expanding "inside job". Why do you suppose flight simulator technicians and flight data recorder experts would join together in a plot to murder thousands of fellow citizens and remain forever silent ?
Originally posted by kwakakev
Peace is not good for profits if you are in the war business. For the prime suspects with the inside job whodidit.org...