It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sinny
I'd just like to add that if you read my original post with the link...the guys talking about NWO actually have good intentions to bring the human race together and eradicate all destruction so the human race can continue to advance as a civilization...
Makes sense to me
you know..eradicate all different religions (They cant all be right anyway, they bloody contradict each other!!)
Abolish borders and countries (If aliens were to greet us Instead of saying "I'm American" or I'm British" we should totally be like.. "Im an Earthling") lol
I dont get what all the fuss is over....or am I missing something?edit on 30-6-2011 by Sinny because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by fenceSitter
I agree...still cant understand why Americans think its normal to walk around with lethal weaponsedit on 30-6-2011 by Sinny because: Typooooooooo
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by fenceSitter
I agree...still cant understand why Americans think its normal to walk around with lethal weaponsedit on 30-6-2011 by Sinny because: Typooooooooo
Originally posted by Cythraul
Maybe the Brits who went to America ran away rather than staying to fight the tyanny of the Crown. Granted, those of us who did didn't do a very good job of preserving our ancestral liberty , but there's time yet.
TextThe common Jacobite supporters fared better than the ranking individuals. In total, 120 common men were executed, one third of them being deserters from the British Army.[45] [note 8] The common prisoners drew lots amongst themselves and only one of out of twenty actually came to trial. Although most those who did stand trial were sentenced to death, almost all of these had their sentences commuted to transportation to the British colonies for life. In all, 936 men were thus transported, and 222 more were banished.
Oliver Cromwell "barbadosed" Irish who refused to clear off their land and allowed other Irish to be kidnaped from the streets of Ireland and transported to Barbados. Those who were barbadosed were sold as slaves or indentured servants, to British planters. They lived in slave conditions and had no control over the number of years they had to serve. The number of Barbadosed Irish in not known and estimates very widely, from a high of 60,000 to a low of 12,000.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish Catholics had been prohibited by the penal laws from owning land, from leasing land; from voting, from holding political office; from living in a corporate town or within 5 mi (8.0 km) of a corporate town, from obtaining education, from entering a profession, and from doing many other things that are necessary in order to succeed and prosper in life. The laws had largely been reformed by 1793, and in 1829, Irish Catholics could again sit in parliament following the Act of Emancipation.[13]
The 1841 census showed a population of just over eight million. Two-thirds of those depended on agriculture for their survival, but they rarely received a working wage. They had to work for their landlords in return for the patch of land they needed in order to grow enough food for their own families. This was the system which forced Ireland and its peasantry into monoculture, as only the potato could be grown in sufficient quantity. The rights to a plot of land in Ireland could mean the difference between life and death in the early 19th century.[15]
Originally posted by crudos
Never going to happen. Second sentence, same as the first. Take a breath, relax, think how utterly impossible such a act would be to enact in the US, short of martial law.
Originally posted by cloaked4u
does the U.N overrule the amendments and gov'ts?
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
So, while I am sure some people emigrated so they wouldnt have to "deal with the tyranny" many of the people who ended up in the colonies in the early years really had little or no choice in the matter, and many of them were the ones who were resisting English tyranny.
Originally posted by Cythraul
[
Hey, don't mistake my sentiment. Like I said in my first reply, I just kindly ask that you don't tar all the English with the same brush. I don't agree with Sinny's point of view - I'm pro-gun, I hate our current monarchy and government and regret many of the things that have been done throughout history in England's name.
Originally posted by Cythraul
* Note: I do realise that many ordinary English people will have some Norman blood as it has filtered down over the centuries.