It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The justices ruled in a 5 to 4 decision (PDF) to uphold the appeal of Michael Turner, a father who had been jailed for a year because he did not — he said could not — pay the nearly $6,000 in child support payments he owed. The court decided that Turner’s incarceration violated the due process clause because he had not been told that his ability to pay was crucial to the case and the court never determined whether Turner could, in fact, make his child support obligations.
Such court-ordered employment programs are in place in many states, including Maryland and Virginia, as well as the District. “These programs cost a little money,” Sorensen said, “but research shows that they can be a lot cheaper than incarcerating somebody.”
Originally posted by nixie_nox
My question for the courts is this: if the custodial parent loses their job, they are expected to find a way to care for the child. How is that fair?
Originally posted by nikkij
By the way, filing a modification is easy the child support office often helps.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by nikkij
By the way, filing a modification is easy the child support office often helps.
It's easy if you're asking for an increase, not so easy if asking for a decrease.
The fact that your ex owes 140k shows how absurd the system is, I don't care how old your daughter is, there is no way in he ll it has cost 280k to provide for her necessities.
My step-daughter's biological Father has never paid either, he owes something like 70k... I honestly don't blame him for working under the table, he never wanted a child to start with.edit on 30-6-2011 by SevenBeans because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nikkij
Im obviously new here so please excuse my failed attempt at quoting that post! Of my ex's $140,000 in back child support nearly half of that is interest because he chose not to pay his principal!
Originally posted by nikkij
So since I wasn't the one who necessarily wanted a child should I just get to walk away with an "OH WELL?" I don't think so.
Originally posted by CaDreamer
reply to post by nikkij
He does not deserve to be a parent and he has proven already that he isnt a father.
hope things improve..edit on 30-6-2011 by CaDreamer because: typo
Originally posted by nikkij
Thank you! Things are great I have a smart beautiful little girl. In the end all the hard work I have done to make sure she has what she needs will pay off because I have gotten to experience her on a day to day basis. Nothing better than watching your child grow up
Originally posted by nikkij
He obviously never wanted a child to begin with! He just said he did! I love my daughter and that is why I have accepted responsibility for her. I have never withheld her from him. Like I said, he has never wanted to see her or be in her life. Your right is was my choice to not abort or adopt her out, but other than that he also had a choice in the matter. She was wanted by him until a month before delivery. Nothing monumental happened other than the fact that she was about to be real. I have offered him a compromise program but its all or nothing for him. He doesn't even have a permanent address.