Let Them Drink Milk

page: 1
4

log in

join

posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 04:06 AM
link   
It's very interesting and frustrating to say the least. My Family has always been big milk drinkers, so I think I'm going to take a break from milk for awhile. I never thought of milk to be one the first/most things to be contaminated. This definitely something worth remembering, although I wouldn't panic, yet...


The Intel Hub By Alex Thomas March 30th, 2011 Today the Environmental Protection Agency reported that radiation has been found in milk from Spokane, Washington. The EPA released data taken on March 25th that indicates low levels of radiation have been detected. Not only is this startling, it also shows that it either takes the EPA five days to test milk or there is a five day waiting period before information is released to the public. The EPA’s Radnet system conducts radiological monitoring of milk and then hands jurisdiction over safety, labeling, and identify of milk and milk products to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Results from a screening sample taken March 25 from Spokane, Wash. detected 0.8 pCi/L of iodine-131, which is more than 5,000 times lower than the Derived Intervention Level set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.” “These types of findings are to be expected in the coming days and are far below levels of public health concern, including for infants and children. Iodine-131 has a very short half-life of approximately eight days, and the level detected in milk and milk products is therefore expected to drop relatively quickly,” according to an EPA statement released today. The statement then went on to say that we are exposed to radiation everyday and that these levels are too low to cause any health effects. “Iodine-131 has a half-life of eight days, and the level found in milk and dairy products is expected to drop relatively quickly,” the agencies said. The fact that multiple experts, including Dr. Chris Busby have debunked the myth that low levels of radiation are harmless seems to remain unimportant to the same agency who told us the air was safe to breath after 9/11. At the same time that radiation is being detected in the United States, certain officials within the EPA are actively campaigning to make significant changes to the Protective Active Guidelines or PAGs. PAGs are used by the EPA to enforce the law following any incident involving the release of radioactive material. Michael Kane, reporting for Collapse.net wrote about the huge increase that the EPA is attempting to make to these guidelines: “In 1992, the EPA produced a PAGs manual that answers many of these questions. But now an update to the 1992 manual is being planned, and if the “Dr. Strangelove” wing of the EPA has its way, here is what it means (brace yourself for these ludicrous increases): * A nearly 1000-fold increase for exposure to strontium-90; * A 3000 to 100,000-fold hike for exposure to iodine-131; and * An almost 25,000 rise for exposure to radioactive nickel-63.i This increase is absolutely ridiculous considering many people believe the levels that are considered acceptable now are actually harmful over a long period of time. Whether or not radiation from the Fukushima nuclear power plant will cause harm in the United States over a long period of time is unknown due to the fact that most experts are pushing the official line and data is being kept secret. With that being said, it is highly unlikely that milk tainted with Iodine-131 will cause radiation sickness,(the shelf life is very short) the real worry is whether or not other radioactive particles with longer shelf lives will end up in the food and water supply.




Let Them Drink Milk – December 1997 By: Pat Ortmeyer and Arjun Makhijani

Article published as “Worse Than We Knew,” for November/December 1997 issue of The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists On August 1, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) revealed that as a result of U.S. nuclear tests conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), American children were actually exposed to 15 to 70 times as much radiation as had been previously reported to Congress. As a result, many thousands of today’s adults are at risk of developing thyroid cancer. The information comes from fragments of a congressionally mandated study, 14 years in the making. The NCI report details estimated radiation doses to the thyroid gland due to releases of radioactive iodine 131. Most of the releases occurred from 1951 to 1958.


Here is the rest of the article: Source




posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 09:45 PM
link   
reply to post by SSDDay
 


Next time I make a post I think I am going to add 2 sentences and then 1000 words of copy and paste. It looks like it really makes posting easy.

In response to the post itself, there is no information posted in it that cant be found in one of the numerous posts about contaminated milk where the poster took the time to actually contribute their personal opinions, and insights as well as beliefs. In fact the article itself that was written 3 months ago can be found in at least 10 of the posts that can be found by searching "contaminated milk". The difference is that the article itself doesn't make up the entire post.

Sorry guy but this post amounts to little more than a glorified version of the suggestion bars on my news feed rss.
edit on 30-6-2011 by DrunkNinja because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by DrunkNinja
 


lol



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   

detected 0.8 pCi/L of iodine-131


During the days of above ground testing it was 10 to 20 times that much in some southwestern states from testing in Nevada.
Brazil nuts are near the top of the list with 12000 picocuries per kg and this is not from fallout but because brazil nut plants can pick up larger amounts of natural radioactive elements from the soil.

Is found in very small, nonlethal amounts in cigarettes (from about 0.2 to about 0.5 picocuries per cigarette).

i will keep drinking milk but thank you for the attempt to scare.



posted on Aug, 13 2011 @ 11:07 AM
link   
reply to post by SSDDay
 


Yes radiation for some reason absorb easily in cow's milk. I have read though that cow's milk isn't exactly healthy for humans to drink.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 05:24 PM
link   
Raw milk is one of the healthiest products that you can add into your diet. Pasteurized milk on the other hand is harmful.





top topics
 
4

log in

join