It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pATTONME
Sminky, how come whenever you are proven wrong about something you have to come up with some bull# to make your self seem right again.
If you're proven wrong then take it like a man
and don't conjur up some monkey brain # to try to make other people feel as though they're wrong.
And if you think everything you said is the truth then I sincerely feel for you and anyone that knows you because you'll only spread your stupidity and ignorance.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Sminkey, while I respect your right to your own opinion, please refrain from using hostile words here.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Sminkey, while I respect your right to your own opinion, please refrain from using hostile words here.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
First of all if any other country has a problem with our DOD budget can mind its own business, they are jsut mad they cant keep up.
Its our money and we can do what we want with it.
I don't want as many raptors as F-15 I just want 300 or more raptors. And the F-35 is being mass produced the Us military will buy like 1000+ of them, not to mention the rest of the world.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The F-22 is worth it weight in gold
Originally posted by muppet
...another useless fact from muppet!
- I heard the B2 cost more than it's own weight in gold.....care to do the math and see if that's just another baseless urban legend muppet?
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
It is indeed worth more then gold
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If my math is correct its worth alot more then gold
Originally posted by muppet
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If my math is correct its worth alot more then gold
The maths looks good, but then you've got depreciation, servicing, insurance.. not to mention the hassle trying to park the damn thing!
- Yeah that's right Westy, people concerned at the growing militarisation in the world are just jealous. Jayzuss save us.
-Yeah we're well aware of the FU attitude some have across the US when it comes to the rest of the world.....till you need us of course.
-How impressive. The day you find a real use for them I'm sure your fellow tax-payers will be glad.
I bet your 'Pax Americana' visions are really spoiled knowing what the rest of the developed world thinks of your ideas.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
WARNING!!!! Before readin-All little crybabies and tree huggers should be moved away from the computer screen. Parental discretion is advised.
The rest of the world is only concerned about Americas growing DOD budget and our military equipment.
But these same people are not concerned about the build up of other countries. That is hypocrite and it poses me off, causing me to have the FU its my money foreign policy.
Need you? we helped the Europeans in WWI we helped them in WWII and we have never begged for the help of other countries.
The rest of the world by far need to US more than we need you IMO.
After all why shouldn't we have the Fu attitude its our country and our budget so why is the rest of the world crying like school girls about it.
Find a use for them? What part of the Eagle is 30+ years old don't you understand, ne fighter coming out by other countries might match the Eagle.
In the USAF this is not acceptable air superiority is a must hence we need the Raptor. Oh and let me tell you cow concerned and worried i am of what the French think of us
There are fighters coming out in the near future that are DIRECT threats, such as the Mig 1.44 and Su-47.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
There are fighters coming out in the near future that are DIRECT threats, such as the Mig 1.44 and Su-47.
- Mig 1.42/44 and Su 37/47 Berkut? You cannot be serious.
A serious threat? Since when are either of these properly developed aircraft? Where is the proof of any manufacture even?
The Mig has been suspended for years.
The Su is a paper prototype thought to be being developed from the su37. Everything about the Su known to date says it's likely to be close to FSW F15 with a heavy ram coating and vectoring nozzles. Big deal. It's still basically a gen back and relying on Russian systems, tough stuff but hardly curring edge.
Anyway who could afford them in any numbers? Why should anyone believe they are the better of the current generation never mind the next?
....and how come you are putting this in terms of aircraft/airframes alone when everything about this area now makes it clear that it's the integrated advanced systems are what win.
The idea that there are any credible threats coming from any airforce is simple sales patter from the US industry.
'What if.....' and 'be afraid because this might happen....' are hardly 'evidence'.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
As I said, "in the near future." As for a manufacturer, you do know that "Su" stands for Sukhoi and that "Mig" stands for RSK Mig. And yes, they are direct threats. The Mig is even nicknamed "the Raptor killer". You are correct in saying that they re not fully developed, but the Mig has been given 6 billion dollars to develope.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The Mig has been suspended for years.
Paper prototype? This doesn't look like a paper airplane to me...
Russia, China, India ect ect ect would probably want to put these planes into ther airforce.
People would believe they are good because the Russians have a history of making very very VERY good aircraft. Dollar for dollar, they make they best planes in the world.
Because you need numbers. Having a lot of airframes allows you to fight in more areas while still having reserves. Yes, I agree that tech wins now adays, but here is the thing, you still need to match up with the enemies numbers, otherwise the can attack different places and you won't be able to defend them all.
Perhaps you didn't see the thread on how Indias airforce beat the USAF in recent wargames. They had the first look and shot, and thus won. That says nothing of Russias air force.
The evidence is in the facts - the Eagle is old and needs to be replaced. Besides, there s no reason to become complacent.