It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by watchedbyskulls
Reply to post by ANOK
you are correct. Diesel fuel is not flammable, it is combustable. This is the reason diesel engines have no spark plugs. The fuel combusts under extreme pressure.
How were fuel tanks underneath the building responsible for accelerating a fire on upper floors?
It will be hilarious when all those OS supporters who want to claim fire brought down building seven start supporting the claims in a lawsuit which directly contradict NIST. LOLOL. 'NIST explained how the Towers came down' But what about building seven? 'There were fuel tanks in the basement, idiot. They fuelled the fire which lead to the collapse!' Not according to NIST. They specifically said that was NOT the case. So are NIST wrong about building seven, or wrong about the towers, and if they are wrong about some of it, how can we accept any of it as authoritative? What fun.
Because while the main fuel tanks were outside the building, there was a "day tank" located in the mechanical room with the generators. This tank was 275 gal in size, about what find in basement of average home. Further the fuel pumps which moved diesel from the main storage tanks to the day tank had a backup power supply so even if the main power supply to WTC 7 was cut off the fuel would still be pumped to the generators CON ED is claiming that diesel fuel fed the fires and lead to collapse of WTC 7 Backup generators were there to provide emergency power to NYC OEM office and other tenants