It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Australian Greens Leader "Bob Brown" calls publicly for a One World Government

page: 1
22
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:16 AM
link   
As if Australian Politics couldn't get any worse, we have this numbskull of a Greens Leader publicly declaring that we should support a One World Government model.

Can someone embed that vid for me? I dont know where to find the youtube video number.
Video Link here - www.youtube.com...=0s



Quoted by Bob Brown -

"So why shouldn’t we now join vigorous moves in Europe and at the United Nations for a global people’s assembly based on one person, one vote, one value? "


Are you serious? Is that the true intentions behind the left and far extreme left of politics?

Bob Brown states in that inteview that the Greens are all for democracy....how does that work in a "Global Parliament" ?

He states "Why shouldn't Australia be at the center of what will be inevetibly Global Governance down the line?"

The Greens hold the balance of power i Australian politics as of this Friday the 1/7/11....remember that day people....for it will be a dark one in our history.

The truth of the Greens/Labour alliance is starting to become public and I tell ya what people....we are totally screwed!

To hell with the Greens!




posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:17 AM
link   
there ya go




posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Melbourne_Militia
As if Australian Politics couldn't get any worse, we have this numbskull of a Greens Leader publicly declaring that we should support a One World Government model.

Can someone embed that vid for me? I dont know where to find the youtube video number.
Video Link here - www.youtube.com...=0s



Quoted by Bob Brown -

"So why shouldn’t we now join vigorous moves in Europe and at the United Nations for a global people’s assembly based on one person, one vote, one value? "


Are you serious? Is that the true intentions behind the left and far extreme left of politics?

Bob Brown states in that inteview that the Greens are all for democracy....how does that work in a "Global Parliament" ?

He states "Why shouldn't Australia be at the center of what will be inevetibly Global Governance down the line?"

The Greens hold the balance of power i Australian politics as of this Friday the 1/7/11....remember that day people....for it will be a dark one in our history.

The truth of the Greens/Labour alliance is starting to become public and I tell ya what people....we are totally screwed!

To hell with the Greens!


All the greens policies were available on thier website b4 last election,its just that the MSM never brought it to the peoples attention,they are basically all a bunch of nutters with no loyalty to the aust people



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:29 AM
link   
australian politics is a farcical show for the people to watch. Its all just the same crap 2 parties who set the agendas and decide what issues will be argued. If ya vote greens ya vote gos to labor anyway.
i was going to rant longer but why?....



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:34 AM
link   
The labor party must be so happy they got into bed with these nut jobs,
One world government no thanks,what is this fool thinking,the really scary thing about the greens is that brown is considered conservative compared to the women(can't remember name) who is expected to be the greens leader when brown retires ,she's right off her nut, hopefully by the next election the inner city hippie fools who vote green will see the harm these clowns are doing to this great nation,



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:37 AM
link   
History is not going to be kind to the likes of Bob Down ,i mean Bob Brown and Gillard and co,all we need is 1 politician with some backbone to send us back to the polls



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bilder
All the greens policies were available on thier website b4 last election,its just that the MSM never brought it to the peoples attention,they are basically all a bunch of nutters with no loyalty to the aust people


And they are different from the others?

Soon people will hopefully realize that none of them represent the Australian people.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:44 AM
link   
vigurous moves?

that's a very interesting thing to say, please elaborate on what moves are occuring for a one world leader?



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by NuclearPaul

Originally posted by Bilder
All the greens policies were available on thier website b4 last election,its just that the MSM never brought it to the peoples attention,they are basically all a bunch of nutters with no loyalty to the aust people


And they are different from the others?

Soon people will hopefully realize that none of them represent the Australian people.


No they are no different from the others,perhaps a little more" out there" but basically the same sellouts.Australians need to get a little less laid back and more like the greeks whiles there is still something to save



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:49 AM
link   
So with so much decent expressed, do we just keep the closed doors of the UN revolving or shut it down altogether? The advent of technology is shrinking the global borders. Where the problem lies is in how it is implemented. Currently we have virtually lawless multi national corporations doing as they please and moving their HQ to where they can pay off some local politicians for some favourable laws and loop holes.

By one world government I do not want to see a big brother, totalitarian, cybernetic dictatorship. As a realist there are many big global problems that needs a global front if they are to be addressed. There are many risks with such centralised power, but if oversight, transparency, accountability and discussion can be increased over the minimalist approach currently in play I am open to it.

We already have a one world government, but it is still a growing organisation with a lot of problems. If this body can be fixed up to run more efficiently and fairer then I am for it. If this is just a disguise to increase multinational corporate power and further enslave, pollute and sell off the planet, then I am against it.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:51 AM
link   
One world government hey?
What are the pros and cons if done correcty and not in a communist dictatorship way?
Do we really believe were not almost already at that stage, that Australia and many others governs itself and don't ride americas tip doing what they want?
Do people really understand how the IMF works and why greece are riding the tip by accepting a bail out even though the population is rioting against it and even though it means privatisation of basic needs infastructure?

I can say our own prime minister of the country of australia is nothing more than a local member of parlimant for the city/state of australia in the larger scale of things. I'd say alot of countries are in the same boat already but in denial



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:55 AM
link   
One world government hey?
What are the pros and cons if done correcty and not in a communist dictatorship way?
Do we really believe were not almost already at that stage, that Australia and many others governs itself and don't ride americas tip doing what they want?
Do people really understand how the IMF works and why greece are riding the tip by accepting a bail out even though the population is rioting against it and even though it means privatisation of basic needs infastructure?

I can say our own prime minister of the country of australia is nothing more than a local member of parlimant for the city/state of australia in the larger scale of things. I'd say alot of countries are in the same boat already but in denial



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:03 AM
link   
the world inevidibly needs to unite, but we need to get rid of greed and materialist mentality. They are the cause of power seekers and curuption and wars. Anyone who still believes wars are religious are quite lost. Does anyone really think that any advanced civilisations in the universe and beyond have their planets devided like we do. I hope for all our sake we wake up.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Melbourne_Militia
 


To be honest i have always been critical of the Greens, not because i dont agree with the majority of their goals or ethos but because it seems Bob Brown has some type of monopoly on the leadership and is never opposed.

Although in regard to an NWO or one world order or government, i am starting to think it wouldn't be that bad. No war, no economic indifference or 'exchange rates' to worry about.

If you think of the evolution of a species what makes more sense;


One race that constantly fights and argues over petty differences or -

A race that unites as one and works together....



If you have any interest in Australian politics then please look here -


Sovereign Party

www.abovetopsecret.com...





edit on 29-6-2011 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Havick007
reply to post by Melbourne_Militia
 


If you think of evolution of a species what makes more sense -

One race that constantly fights and argues over petty differences or -

A race that unites as one and works together....


That is where the problem arises with the entire Left agenda they assume that people truly evolve. While I believe in evolution I also believe that people are inherintely evil and must be restrained, give man an inch and he will take a mile. There are two people I would like to introduce you to that thought the same thing:

Theodore Roosevelt; proponent of Eugenics and Imperialism, believed in popular democracy.
Woodrow Wilson; Imprisoned political opponents, said the US Constitution was outdated, fought wars for democracy, segregated the federal government, gave us the Federal Reserve and Income Tax.

Wilson was an admirer of Benito Mussolini, Hitler publicly sympathized with Franklin Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill praised Mussolini and Hitler for their economic miracles. Fascists (without even considering the racism/genocide factor) were true proponents of evolution that believed man had progressed out of the period of our past and were destined for a new future. Socialism and Fascism are two things mind you, except Fascism is the nationalist expression of what had always been an internationalist movement.

Be careful of who you follow and what you say, read up on the early 20th century, your attitude may change if you read the right sources.

We, just as all other animals, evolve and develope but just like all other animals we never abandon our true natural character and that is symbolized by: power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Would you trust just a few hundred or thousand people to manage your life from a far away capital? What if they decided to oppress you how would you escape? Are you going to revolt? How? They could summon armies from every corner of the globe to crush you. Think twice before speaking.
edit on 6/29/2011 by Misoir because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:29 AM
link   
Every day there is more an more
It is shaping into a farce and there will come a time where Australians will stand up and revolt.

If they keep pushing like they are...



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Misoir
 


To be honest i dont care about left, right or whatever and that is mainly American slang for politics.

I dont care what part of politics you are from or what 'faction' you choose to believe. It all comes down to economics and policy and the best wat to move forward as one and as a whole.

Manage Inflation, manage the enviroment and manage cost of living etc etc.

Currently it is all crap, it's back and forth and the government that wins power always finds excuses to go back on election promises. The government tries to push bills and laws, the opposition never comes up with alternatives, only arguements to say what is wrong....


I am sick of war, famine, indifference and arguements.

There is never anything productive happening and as much as the governments say it 'is the best interest of the country/nation at heart' it never actually listens to the citizens and when you argue you are labelled a 'protester' and then subdued by police and made to look like fools by the MSM....



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Havick007
 


You think more globalization is going to fix any of the issues you raised? If anything it will exacerbate the problems we are experiencing. Wealth will be more concentrated into fewer hands just as politics will. We just keep climbing up and up without even looking back because we are afraid of what we may see. If only we would look back it would be easy to see that we are climbing a pyramid to the top and each time we climb further up it gets smaller. The pyramid represents power and wealth.

You, among others, want us to continue climbing this pyramid assuming that by the time we reach the top everything will spread out and it will be better for most rather than a few. But that has never been the case and never will. The only hope we have of ever improving is to start climbing back down this pyramid known as centralization and believe again in the principles of subsidariaty, localism, and reason.

If you want a one world however that is your deal not mine, just don't expect me or my country to follow you.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 07:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Misoir
 


I see that as the only solution... a universal structure. It would create stability and the ability to plan ahead without issue.

Although i am not advocating some type of police state or strict regime... peolple seem to get confused and when they think of an NWO or a one world order they also seem to relate it to oppresion or a 'police state'.

That isnt true.... as long as it there remains a regulartory body such as the UN, although that might seem to be the opposite of a one world org, there has to be a middle ground.

Something new, that mixes democracy and a one world system. I mean sht we are one race... one people and should be united no matter what colour of skin, what religion or background.

Anything less seems immature.

It can happen whilst we still retain the same freedoms, rights and happiness but with less uncertainty and conflict



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 08:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Havick007
Although i am not advocating some type of police state or strict regime... peolple seem to get confused and when they think of an NWO or a one world order they also seem to relate it to oppresion or a 'police state'.

That isnt true.... as long as it there remains a regulartory body such as the UN, although that might seem to be the opposite of a one world org, there has to be a middle ground.


The idea of a global government is not a bad idea itself, but at present it would be abused by evil people who control the world presently...

... such as the UN.




top topics



 
22
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join