It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
80% of the land of Israel was never given to the Arabs. The Jews would have 52% under the partition plan and the Arabs/Palestinians 48% under the partition plan. The current borders recognized under international law give Israel 79% and and the arabs 21% of Palestine. The Arabs never accepted a Jewish state in 1948 and I have highlighted why. Would you accept a Italian state made of New Jersey?
It is evident you are not all for a United Nations type deal, as you believe Israel should not be bound by international law. No one is ignoring the rights of the Jews. Under International law, the Jewish state would recieve 79% of Palestine.
WHAT?
The Palestinian Refugee problem was not created by the Arabs as you say, the Israeli forced exodus of the Palestinians is the root cause.
It was the ARABS who called for the Arabs living in Israel to leave. Do you get that? No Arabs were kicked out by Israel. Arab leaders suggested that Arabs living in the Westbank, Galilee, and the interior of Israel leave so as not to get killed during their offensive.
If I kick you out of your home, it is not the fault of your neighbour for not taking you into his home, but my fault for kicking you out.
Are you aware that Jordan took in foreign workers from syria and elsewhere - to develop the land - after 1947 when they became a state? Instead of making use of the Palestinians who lived nextdoor, which of course official arab league policy requires them to languish in refugee camps to generate sympathy for the arabs/palestinians.
The Jordanian economy was never and would never be able to incoporate the Palestinians unless this included incoporating the terrotories of the West Bank.
I assure you this as a student of economics: I suggest you research or just logically look at the economic complexeties of accepting refugee's.
Palestinians don't want to join Jordan and that they want their own state?
If you have taken care in reading the works of Ze'ev Jabotinsky you would realise that while resistance to the Jewish state will always exist, Israel has itself established an Iron Wall and shown it's military superiority and its regional power status to all the Arabs.
Tell me what secuirty purpose do the settlements serve?
They already have their Palestinian state! If you havent noticed.
It was the ARABS who called for the Arabs living in Israel to leave. Do you get that? No Arabs were kicked out by Israel. Arab leaders suggested that Arabs living in the Westbank, Galilee, and the interior of Israel leave so as not to get killed during their offensive.
Are you aware that Jordan took in foreign workers from syria and elsewhere - to develop the land - after 1947 when they became a state? Instead of making use of the Palestinians who lived nextdoor, which of course official arab league policy requires them to languish in refugee camps to generate sympathy for the arabs/palestinians.
Israel took in 700,000 refugees from Arab countries between 1948 and 1970.
Whether right or wrong, you will scower for logical/rational proofs to justify your position. It doesnt matter that the Jews have been dealt a miniscule state;
and the final stage in the "strategy of stages in Israels destruction" takes effect, you'll be supporting them again. Because you do not respect truth, or justice.
In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese