The truth about October 28th. It just got real. it's big.

page: 27
63
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 11:33 AM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 


Just because you have no idea what is happening or understand any of these processes or unable to read and comprehend the material you are posting does not mean that others do not.

There is zero evidence that Jupiter is associated with any quakes. If you had anything to post you would have.




posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 





However, an article has been published in the very thread where scientists did try to correlate alignments with earthquakes, but it did not produce significant results.


"So you observed thousands of alignments of Jupiter with Earth for thousands/ millions of years?

That's right.

You haven't so your assertions are devoid of any coherent reasoning"

Because they haven't been observing for long enough and don't have a large enough data set to determine it.

So you're statements are inherently empty.



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 





There is zero evidence that Jupiter is associated with any quakes. If you had anything to post you would have.


There is also Zero evidence proving 100% that alignments cannot cause Earth-quakes because they have not a large enough Data set.

Which would take 1000's Millions of years to collect to determine any out-liars and a plausibility of the notion.

As stated again you are not a scientist ; the way you think.
edit on 11-7-2011 by TheUniverse because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 



There is also Zero evidence proving 100% that alignments cannot cause Earth-quakes because they have not a large enough Data set.


They have a nearly two thousand year data set:


Chinese records on the correlation of heliocentric planetary alignments and earthquake activities

W. -H. Ip
Department of Applied Physics and Information Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
Received 6 January 1976; revised 3 February 1976.

A short account of the correlation of heliocentric planetary alignments and the earthquake activities in Northern China is given. It appears that such arrangement of planetary orbital positions has no effect on the triggering of earthquakes.

www.sciencedirect.com...



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 03:39 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


"In China" Only

And

"2000 Years" Won't Suffice.

You'd need at-least millions of years.
edit on 11-7-2011 by TheUniverse because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 03:52 PM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 



You'd need at-least millions of years.


And yet you don't find anything wrong with Terral Croft and the Doom Patrol declaring two or three earthquakes within two or three days of supposed "Elenin alignments" to be proof of something?



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 





And yet you don't find anything wrong with Terral Croft and the Doom Patrol declaring two or three earthquakes within two or three days of supposed "Elenin alignments" to be proof of something?


I never said Elenin Alignments Were causing Earthquakes

Where are you getting your assertions from



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 04:06 PM
link   
Fight, fight, fight.

This is amusing.

Universe, your losing at the moment matey.



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 



I never said Elenin Alignments Were causing Earthquakes


Then what are you arguing about?



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 07:59 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


I think Jupiter is more plausible candidate for a potential causation for Earth-quakes then lets say Elenin.

If i can put it that way.
edit on 11-7-2011 by TheUniverse because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 08:57 PM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 



There is also Zero evidence proving 100% that alignments cannot cause Earth-quakes because they have not a large enough Data set.

Which would take 1000's Millions of years to collect to determine any out-liars and a plausibility of the notion.

As stated again you are not a scientist ; the way you think.

At least I am able to read.

Your claim that it would take billions of years to collect the data is just your sad attempt to make a false claim. There is no need to do that. Jupiter alignments happen often and so far nothing happens. There are no correlations that is clear. The data is clear alignments are for astrologers and other charlatans to toy with.



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 08:59 PM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 



"In China" Only

And

"2000 Years" Won't Suffice.

You'd need at-least millions of years.

You need to read and to learn some basic elementary school material on these subjects. The evidence is clear alignments have no affect on quakes with the exception of a few types of uncommon/rare low intensity quakes correlated with the Moon.



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 09:00 PM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 


So why is the overwhelming evidence against such a claim. The claim has been tested and been shown to be false.



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 09:18 PM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 





So why is the overwhelming evidence against such a claim. The claim has been tested and been shown to be false.


There is no overwhelming Evidence against such a claim as stated before. You have never provided one source while i have provided several.

You have no evidence and that is because it cannot be claimed 100% that we know for sure there is no relation to Alignments and Earth-quakes.

As i said before it could happen 1 in a million times during an alignment of Jupiter or 1 in a thousand times.

You have no solid evidence to confirm and/or deny any of this 100% and it irks you

I'm not going to assert 100% that it isn't plausible

But people claiming to be 'real' scientists or open-minded thinkers will

Because they have no coherent logic or reasoning.



posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 09:59 PM
link   
reply to post by TheUniverse
 



There is no overwhelming Evidence against such a claim as stated before. You have never provided one source while i have provided several.

All you have done is provide links that have nothing whatsoever to do with your claims. That means you have provided no supporting links.


You have no evidence and that is because it cannot be claimed 100% that we know for sure there is no relation to Alignments and Earth-quakes.

This is the difference between fact and truth argument.

The fact remains that there is zero evidence to support the notions that alignments cause quakes.


As i said before it could happen 1 in a million times during an alignment of Jupiter or 1 in a thousand times.

That means the two are not related. Thanks for telling us all that you are dead wrong.


But people claiming to be 'real' scientists or open-minded thinkers will
Because they have no coherent logic or reasoning.

Thanks for showing us that you are unable to defend your claim that alignments are related to quakes. You should now take the time to learn what open minded means. Clearly you do not.



posted on Jul, 17 2011 @ 03:06 PM
link   
so this came cross me strange...iv been having strange "premonitions". Most premonitions come to me while im awake. But the ones that come to me at nite are what concerns me. What happens in the end.....well its beautiful. O by the way...i was born Oct 28th...weird



posted on Aug, 15 2011 @ 01:30 AM
link   
reply to post by TravisT
 


Hilarious, the big, bad TravisT has his eye on you. Not sure who you think you are TravisT but to me you're just a joke............



posted on Aug, 15 2011 @ 08:09 PM
link   
Please guys.

I read all your arguments.

Please do not think you understand the universe and how it works based on the works of others.

You are only human and you are way out of your league.



posted on Aug, 15 2011 @ 09:41 PM
link   
reply to post by itsJUSTzo
 



Please guys.

I read all your arguments.

Please do not think you understand the universe and how it works based on the works of others.

You are only human and you are way out of your league.


Do you think that astronomers don't know because they rely on the works of theoretical physicists, mathematicians, electrical engineers, technicians, optical engineers, computer programmers, nuclear physicists, mechanical engineers, etc.?

This sounds like the old and discarded claims of Alvin Toffler.



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 06:07 AM
link   
Im following a couple of similar threads on the D4rk Kn1ght
I want to keep an eye on this too...





new topics

top topics



 
63
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join