Don’t let the following text lead you to belive that my title was inaccurate. The question is within the paragraphs below.
Recently by happenstance I came across a video on talking about eugenics and how it will lead to transhumanism, wherein certain people will be chosen
among the masses to be “enhanced”.
(Or something along those lines.)
I can agree that there is much that is potentially dangerous with the transhumanist movement and I think we are perhaps developing at a rate that is
unequal to our mental development as a species. I find it amazing however that I have been and will nevertheless continue to bear witness to the
emergence of a new offshoot of Homo sapiens. I also agree with many transhumanists that such a movement cannot in and of itself be halted, but rather
will continue unabated for no other reason than “It Must Continue”. Evolution is now in our hands, and waiting is not something we as a species
I would like to approach this topic from a different angle however. I want to avoid eugenics disasters and possible wars with machines, becoming
slaves to machines or any other thing of this nature.
It isn’t that these aren’t potentials, but what I want to talk about has to do with personal opinion regarding human machine relations, and more
specifically marriage, child rearing and sex.
Before I get to that, if you would like to hear from one of the leader in this field try the following video; moreover for those who may be unfamiliar
with just how far we have come and how fast we are approaching the next phase of human evolution, this video may enlighten you.
According to scientists, it may not be too long before the line between human and machine is made exceedingly narrow by way of hyper advanced A.I.
nano technologies and a number of other fantastic sciences. It has been stated in various interviews, that when one is to address a machine in say the
next 50 or 60 years, you shouldn’t look at it as you would a computer, or a toaster over, or a fax machine. Rather you will see it as human,
insomuch that you will be for all intense and purposes unable to detect a difference. In fact it is likely that you yourself may also either contain
machine parts or be partially mechanized as well.
“Billions of nanobots in our brains will expand our brains in every conceivable way: expanding our memory, boosting our analytic thinking, and
enhancing our pattern recognition faculties, which is the true strength of human intelligence.”
So let’s say that machines within the next 80 years become so human-esque that you can hardly tell the difference. Will there be a problem with
marriage to one of these entities within society?
In light of all the homosexual marriage bans in various states, and repeals being made in others for such accommodation, I wonder how this new idea of
union will be accepted among the masses of people both straight and gay. This is something I am interested in, since as humans everyone may have a
genuine distaste in wedding a non human… “?life form?”… So will some be more sympathetic to the feelings of the people with such desires?
Programmers can tailor the machines to match a person’s interests or render them somewhat disagreeable to create a desirable level of friction
in a relationship. “It’s not that people will fall in love with an algorithm but that people will fall in love with a convincing simulation of a
human being, and convincing simulations can have a remarkable effect on people,”
While the above quote expresses the idea that a simple humanoid will have an advanced program running that will mimic human behavior, I am talking
about a more advanced version. A version that no longer needs a human to program it per se, and one that could essentially be called alive.
To give you an example of what I mean I would like to place myself on the chopping block.
I am NOT for gay marriage. That doesn’t mean I dislike gays, but I don’t think such unions should occur. But wait there is more, in an
unbelievable and equally immeasurable twist of hypocrisy I am not actually against man machine relations. (Man being a nomenclature for humanity in
general and not specifically gender related.)
Can you believe that? I even shock myself. Why is it this is the case, and what the hell is wrong with me?
So therein is one aspect of this dilemma. How will people react and why will they have the reactions they do? Undoubtedly technology will progress the
level where humans and machines may even be able to copulate, should this be allowed? Can two robot parents raise a human child? What is the
psychology of someone who would do this, and is it the same psychology of people who marry their car? Is it politically correct or otherwise for me to
even be asking these questions?
So many questions and unfortunately not nearly enough time to answer effectively, since we are only just now marginally open to the idea of same sex
marriage, and such a thing has been “tabooish “for a centuries; how then can we expect to fully plow into the next few decades with the same
chiding philosophy we have had for so long as a culture toward people of color and or various sexual peculiarity? Not to mention that to this day
people are still ringing their hands and gnashing their teeth at interracial unions.
So not only am I personally confused by my own reaction in regards to human cyborg/robot extra friendly fraternization, I am also surprised by the
number of people that:
A. Don’t even realize that we are on the cusp of such a change because the assume that such technology is merely science fiction.
and think your a kook for saying it is at hand.
B. Are open to certain areas and closed minded to others, which is strange to me since when one considers transcending biology it would seem you have
to take the whole thing for what it is or none at all.
I think that when it comes to the journey of transhumanism with the ultimate goal being a post human society; I can only wonder if we are ready. Of
course I think the simple answer to that question is that we 're not, and it is for this reason that I think our reactions in the years to come are
going to make for some very interesting scenarios.
If you don’t agree with my stance on gay marriage, I’m sorry it is your right, just like it is the right of gays to marry who they want. Please
don’t take this as an opportunity to attack off topic. I am a sicko, I don’t need to be reminded.
Well, as far as being taken over by a machine, Im afraid people already have given in.
When you use a cell phone you give in, when you use a computer, a toothbrush, eyeglasses.
The fact that people inherently feel the need to not just modify but improve upon their environment and themselves shows that humans have already
given into the change. It's just that now the change is happening faster and will continue to increase.
that being said though, if such a time comes that a machine would like to make me subservient, I think Im gonna have a problem with that. But remember
a lot of those machines may have previously and still are consciously human.
interesting stuff snowen20. i've noticed many people react unwell at the mention of eugenics, so the thought of next-generation human / machine
interfacing would probably not be a source of happiness.
i think mankind has a long way to go to devolve back to the level of parenting that existed before the family structure was undermined as we have seen
in the USA. if i recall correctly two years ago i read 51% of American households are single women with children.
as for robot parents, there has probably been similar fears in the past as technological advancements brought about new inventions like incubators or
MRI machines. these passive medical aids may have been viewed suspiciously by skeptics until they proved their worth. over time any threat imposed by
the presence of such machinery would wane as familiarity and trust grew. technology needs time to assimilate into the mainstream.
given time it seems like most anything that people imagine may come to be. today our lives are filled with gadgets that surpass many things seen in
old sci-fi movies and comic books. hopefully as time goes by things will change for the better so our humanity will catch up to our technology.
I started this thread because I wanted to see the varying reactions of people.
O knew ahead of time that many may be wholly turned off by the subject if not completely repulsed.
The reactions are based on something I am trying to fully understand, the same issue is involved in peoples acceptance of interracial relationships,
or Gay marriage.
I have a more conservative view, and as such view things in a less progressive way. I don't agree with any of these things per se, but the idea of
the change is very interesting to me.
Which ones are the robots, and which ones are the people?
We can't throw them all into the pit. Besides those robots as you call them don't want to die, any more than the humans. Where are their rights, as
Well, according to the top scientists an algorithm can be created, though one may not exist yet. Actually if you are referring to the quote, I think
some of it was cut off from the article, it was not speaking presently. Currently humans have to program computers to perform simple or complex tasks,
this will most likely change in the next few decades. At which point a computer will be able to not only program itself, but self replicate other more
advanced versions of itself autonomously from human control.
At that stage is where you get the whole, Machines will enslave us all idea, though the likelihood of that is probably miniscule considering the safe
guards you would have. For example if a system of computers with individual intelligence thousands of times higher than a humans we would be screwed,
so we simply make a machine with a thousand time more intelligence than the attacker. That is unless one tries to convince the other. This is beyond
human control at that point.
In response to your other question. No at first you would not call them a robot you would call them an enhanced human, like an athlete with an
artificial leg that is better for sprinting than his human legs were, or bionic ears for the deaf or whatever.
Later as these enhancements increase, the way cell phone usage increased, people will develop a dependance on such items. Things like nano molecules
for improved longevity, youth, and all manner of things may be utilized. So much so that in a rather short amount of time say a few decades past that
point, humans with full mechanical bodies may be prevalent. Brains that were formerly organic have been slowly incorporated into a mechanical
substrate to work faster and more efficiently. Is this person still human? I don't know.
edit on 28-6-2011 by snowen20 because: (no reason
edit on 28-6-2011 by snowen20 because: (no reason given)
Jesus, ATS how about a little love huh?
I actually took time to contribute to this website by researching and writing this thread. Perhaps I should look up the latest celebrity wedding and
post that next time.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.