It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
I just rewatched several times the video in the first link of the opening thread post on Olgacom and the former employee whistleblower saying that Olgacom is logistics for chemicals and chemical waste supplying this to commercial airlines like, I think she mentioned KLM and one other I can't catch. She says that commercial airlines are being used to dump chemicals and also being used to dump chemical waste on regularly scheduled and traveled routes which probably is supposed to be in some sort of special dump area and not in the sky. They are doing this under the guise of supplying catering. She is being threatened for breaking her non-disclosure agreement and her online activity is claimed to be monitored and a veiled threat issued towards her friends.
I'm pretty sure that's a hoax. Olgacom does not seem to be a real company. Their web site contains just a few stock photos, and was only just set up.
So how can we be sure that what they say is in fact true? How can we be sure that they are dropping what they say they are dropping and the quantities they say they are dropping?
Originally posted by Equinox99
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by Equinox99
Cloud seeding (for rain augmentation, which is what we are talking about here) is not geoengineering. Geoengineering alters the global climate for years. Cloud seeding alters the local weather for an hour or two.
Regardless if the words are broken down it forms the same meaning. Cloud ceding is throwing something at a lower atmosphere to make rain clouds. Geo-engineering is high altitudes to reflect some sunlight away from the Earth to make it cooler.
Originally posted by chrismicha77
reply to post by firepilot
You of all people should know that it gets warmer the higher you get, closer to the stratosphere...but anyway.
Give me some suggestions on what you would do, to prove they existed, if you believed in them. I'll do whatever I can to get the answers!
Who else is doing weather modification?
The latest data from the World Meteorological Organization compiled in 2000 listed 74
projects ongoing in 23 countries worldwide (WMO, 2000). In 2001 the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) documented 66 projects conducted in the
western U.S. Project objectives included fog dispersal, snowpack and rainfall
enhancement, and hail suppression.
Originally posted by Equinox99
Cloud ceding is throwing something at a lower atmosphere to make rain clouds.
23 countries and 66 documented projects in Western US alone, now how can you be sure they are only dropping silver iodide, various salts, and dry ice?
Originally posted by Equinox99
reply to post by Phage
Who else is doing weather modification?
The latest data from the World Meteorological Organization compiled in 2000 listed 74
projects ongoing in 23 countries worldwide (WMO, 2000). In 2001 the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) documented 66 projects conducted in the
western U.S. Project objectives included fog dispersal, snowpack and rainfall
enhancement, and hail suppression.
23 countries and 66 documented projects in Western US alone, now how can you be sure they are only dropping silver iodide, various salts, and dry ice?
Interestingly enough, such Rayleigh scattering of sunlight, performed by stratospherically-deployed aerosols whose diameters are several-fold smaller than the wavelength of light itself, will selectively scatter back into space the largely deleterious ultraviolet component of sunlight while diminishing the light that we see – and that plants use for photosynthesis – only imperceptibly.
From the human perspective, skies would be bluer, twilights would be more visually spectacular, plants would be less stressed by UV photodamage and thus would be more productive, and children playing out-of-doors would be much less susceptible to sunburn (and thus to skin dysplasias and dermal cancers as adults), if this stratospheric Rayleigh scattering system were to be deployed.