Case Dismissed Against Woman Arrested While Videotaping Police , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 83 times
Topic started on 27-6-2011 @ 01:03 PM by anon72

Case Dismissed Against Woman Arrested While Videotaping Police


www.whec.com
The case against a Rochester woman arrested while videotaping police has been dismissed.

Early this afternoon, demonstrators rallied outside the Hall of Justice in support of Emily Good who was arrested while videotaping police officers during a traffic stop on May 12 in front of her 19th Ward home.

Good recorded police officers making a traffic stop while standing in her front yard even though an officer asked her to stop and go inside. She was charged with obstructing of governmental administration. Since then, the video from that night has made it onto news shows across the country.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 01:03 PM by anon72


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 01:16 PM by pigwithoutawig
reply to post by Manhater



Charged for what? Recording police from her front yard. Give me a break. She did nothing wrong therefore the charges were dropped and now the police will have to settle a lawsuit. As the great Charlie Sheen once said, "Winning"


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 01:29 PM by anon72
reply to post by Sparky63



With over 600 replys, many people may not check back on the original story etc.

Besides, it is breaking news. Within 5 mins of the story being released.... give me some credit

I wonder if those defenders of the police will be on and commenting.

For the record.. I did make this call on last Thursday (another )
www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 01:34 PM by Sparky63
reply to post by anon72


You're right...I just wish I had thought of that. Day late and a dollar short I guess.
Good luck on your thread. The important thing is that this woman was found innocent and this cop is being investigated.


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 01:37 PM by Sparky63
reply to post by Vitchilo



This interpretation of the law is being challenged in all these states. This "wire tapping" rule is surely to be overruled sooner or later.


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 01:39 PM by anon72
reply to post by Vitchilo



it's wiretapping or some BS like that.


I believe that is if there is sound being recorded. That is where the wiretapping etc comes into play.

Example, in PA. Both sides (or at least two sides) have to be aware and agree to the taping of voice. So, that is how the cops are trying to get by all of that.

One can easily plug their Video recorder but I don't know about a phone. I will try to get some of the videos of when the cops asks "are you recording my voice (or similar)"


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 01:41 PM by Vitchilo
Originally posted by anon72
reply to
post by Vitchilo



it's wiretapping or some BS like that.


I believe that is if there is sound being recorded. That is where the wiretapping etc comes into play.


And I bet if you don't have sound, and you record that the cop is beating you up on video and you go to trial, it won't be accepted because ``it doesn't contain sound``...

The wiretapping law is BS.


reply posted on 27-6-2011 @ 02:00 PM by navy_vet_stg3
I am a supporter of law enforcement (in general), and I believe that the vast majority of them are good people, doing a crappy job for a crappy salary, and trying to do it to the best of their ability. However, there is a segment of police that think they're above the law and that they are "better" than the civilian population. That being said, I am extremely happy that this woman had the charges dropped, and I really hope there is some type of disciplinary action taken against the officer.

I understand that a police officer has the right to come home to his/her family at the end of a shift, and I also know that cop's don't lose. Those are 2 fundamental truths that us civilians need to understand. Police will protect themselves, and yes, you may have the "right" to do whatever it is you're doing, but you also need to understand that things could go downhill for you rather quickly if you don't do what you're told. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying to be a lemming, but there are some (not necessarily this one) circumstances where you "can legally" do something, but by doing so, you're going to have to pay the piper, so to speak. It's no different than crossing a crosswalk. Yes, you can walk out into traffic, and they're supposed to stop, but are you going to risk life and limb to prove a point? Not me. I'll make damn sure it's safe to cross. The same thing with the cops. Yeah, I may be filming in my front yard, but what exactly am I out to "prove" by continuing to film? Am I intentionally baiting the cops? We'd scream "entrapment" if it were the other way around.

As for the cops not losing, they don't. You may get one, or two of them, but in the end, you're going to be a slab of meat on a stainless steel table. So, remember these truths, because whether they're right or wrong from a physiological standpoint, they are accurate from an outcome standpoint. But, like I said, I'm glad this turned out well for the woman, and I hope the officer learns a lesson over this, and that he goes on to become a better cop, serving THE PEOPLE, and not his own ego.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 4 days ago with 94 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 8 days ago with 73 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 6 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 8 days ago with 58 member flags
3 NATO Protesters Face Terror Conspiracy Charges
  Posted 9 days ago with 46 member flags