posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 11:14 PM
Let's just take the example of where Titor mentions "A skyscraper missing in New York." Notice the singular??
Yet, we are missing TWO skyscraper in New York...both WTC1 and 2...also WTC7, so, technically, THREE!!
Is is possible this was NOT a reference to 9/11...but maybe a reference to the building they are planning in PLACE OF the WTC, and he could be
referring to a future event that has YET to be fulfilled?
Unless I am mistaken, WTC is to be replaced by a SINGLE skyscraper, that is 1,776 feet tall? ONE skyscraper!!
Perhaps THIS one gets attacked later? and that THIS is the "A skyscraper missing in New York" that he's referring to, and NOT 9/11?
After all, if he really WAS from 2036...this building would have been built by then, and conceivably could get attacked and brought down again by that
time. Possible, do you suppose...that this reference of Titor's speaks of an event YET TO HAPPEN...and we are misinterpreting it to refer to 9/11,
when, in fact, it may refer to an entirely different event?