60-70 African American youth march in Peoria, shouting: "Kill All The White People"

page: 13
50
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 08:27 AM
link   
reply to post by korathin
 


Regarding Hispanics, you're probably not alone with your thinking. We have been officially notified by census data that they are the fastest growing group in America.

The long run? It seems that birthrates get to dictate a whole lot.

Logically speaking, at least from my point of view, blacks are possibly one of the smallest "problems" in America, for a whole lot of reasons. Maybe people don't stop and think of some of the things you mention. If things keep going this way, is anyone going to be worried about blacks in 50 years? Probably not very much, because they are going to shrink to a much smaller minority than today.

Blacks also face a host of health issues, as a group, that don't bode well for the "dark" future some of the supremacists used to talk about 40 years ago.

All that being said, I would still not want to put too much on the Hispanics either. They are doing the "natural" thing, in Darwinist terms anyway, and if the future is "browner", and maybe even Spanish-speaking, then there might not be much to be done about it. Birthrates. They're king, at least in the long run.

I personally prefer to focus on a "common" enemy that we all seem to have, and while they're harder to "picture" than flash mobs, and rioting youths, they are as real as can be. We typically call them the PTB, and the more I have learned about them, the more I tend to see beyond the "obvious" that we are being fed by the media. There's always something else going on.

Is what's really going on something like a "softer, gentler genocide"? Could be. Sort of could look that way, depending on what we focus on. But this could be exactly the kind of thing that our masters get a lot of mileage out of, if we're not careful. At some point, if people did (finally) discover how dire their collective fate was, people could get (justifiably) angry. But here's where it goes wrong. That anger will no doubt end up released on those who were least likely to have anything to do with it. And our masters just laugh, as their little puppets dance this way, and that.

Which leads me to my final point. You mention guns, protecting your family, etc. All good things to do of course. But I go a step further. Don't fight, if at all possible. Instead, RUN. If a person finds things changing where they live, not as safe anymore, then do what people have done for centuries: Just leave. This is one of the big reasons lots of people find themselves in America after all. Our parents may not have all come here willingly, but most of the more recent immigrants, many who have come thousands of miles, left their nations because they were full of problems. Sure, now some of those problems we all get to deal with. But then, maybe we just have to keep moving...

JR




posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 09:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Partygirl
 


I'm going to go ahead and call this either bogus or a major extrapolation from a minor incident, if any even occurred.

My reasons?

First off, all of the other sites that mention this quote the article you posted in part or verbatim.

Second: The original article has no "journalist" or "signature". In other words, it was penned by whom?

Third: The man, Paul Wilkinson, who is the "eye-witness" is mentioned as just the president of a community association. You are meant to think he is just another average, good, white American in a gated-community type situation. However, he seems to be an active political junkie in that neck of the woods, for the Republicans, and he appears to be a big fan of Aaron Schock (local representative), as can be seen:

here
and here
and on many other sites devoted to Republican politics from that region.

Also, there is this comment, which strikes me as a sign that this Paul Wilkinson is a party hack who is trying to rustle up some attention and in all honesty, he is probably delusional, allowing his fantasies of race war, terrorism, Marxism, socialism and God knows what else to cloud his judgment.

Which alludes to this feud: www.pjstar.com article

I think that it was wrong to title Paul Wilkinson as a community association president. I find this type of deceptive titling of people very frequently, in articles, on news reports (where people are introduced as "pundits" - which essentially means nothing - when in fact they are industry spokespeople or workers for certain PACs and such). I think this story has more to be uncovered.

So, unless someone can come up with another person's "eye-witness" report, I cannot believe that this anything. And assuming there was more than a hand-full of rowdy Black kids, even the article seems to show that it was only a hand-full who made some inappropriate remarks.

Was anyone commenting here even present to witness what happened? No? Then without more than one guy's "eye-witness" reporting, it's kind of a stretch of logic to assume anything occurred the way it's been reported.

Not too mention the half dozen other sites I've seen that have shown the same line of reasoning based on this Paul Wilkinson commentary. Who's playing who?


edit on 29-6-2011 by Sphota because: url issue



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 09:28 AM
link   
reply to post by MiloNickels
 


Psst... your de-evolution's showing.




Go on youtube and find me a video of a group of whites attacking a black person. I don't care what terms you put into your search to find this video.






Even if you can find that one RARE diamond in the rough of a black person being attacked by a whites...I want you to take notice of the COUNTLESS opposing videos you have to pour through to find that needle in a haystack. If you can't look at the evidence honestly because the truth is counter to your P-C beliefs, whose head is really up their ass?


It took about a minute by the way. Saying it was tough is a gross exaggeration.




You can call me racist all day long. The fact is when I'm walking down the street at night, and see a group of (black) "youths" in front of me, I'm gonna go a different way--because I see the recent trends in the news realistically for what they are.


Racist, Racist, Racist. Ill be back at 3 for more. I dont mean to be rude, but your comments have reached a level of serious discontent with myself, and seemingly the rest of the thread. You, are only positioning yourself to see one side of the issue. It has not to do with race. It has to do with jealousy, it has to do with social situation, it has to do with an economic, and geo-locational issues. Notice, how all of these can be applied to every race somewhere in the world at the lower income end of society. To categorically label it as a race issue and not a oppression (by the system) issue, is simply superficial. White people go to jail for the very same issues black people do. Drugs, Violence, drunk driving, murder, rape, ect.

So when you say:



when I'm walking down the street at night, and see a group of (black) "youths" in front of me, I'm gonna go a different way--because I see the recent trends in the news realistically for what they are.


I say, maybe me too. First tho, I will take the time to determine the abrasiveness of the group before I walk past them. I would do the very same if I walked across a group of "youths" from any race. I have had my issues in life with aggressive whites and aggressive blacks. They didn't always turn out in my favor but it taught me a very important lesson.

Trust none by the hue of their skin 'cause for you know it, multi-colored fists shall be in thy eyes.
edit on 1-7-2011 by derst1988 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 09:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Partygirl
 



edit on 1-7-2011 by sam_inc because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 09:47 AM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 




I'm sorry, but that's pretty funny I admit






top topics
 
50
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join