It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NothingMakesSense
Thgis thread has digressed, but if I may I want to insert a very impt fact about nuclear weapons and their production:
The enrichment process is not simple nor cheap nor easy to hide. The facilities required are enormous, as are the power requirements. There are two basic ways to enrich (natural) uranium:
1) convert the natural uranium to a gas and send it through several thousand steps of filters. Because the U-235 is lighter, it rises faster, and so after several thousand steps you have mostly pure U-235.
2) convert the nat uranium to a gas again and use a centrifuge to separate the U-235 from the U-238, using the same principle of the differences of weight.
Please note: I do not know how to convert the nat uranium to a gas for either method, which is the critical step.
So in conclusion I would like to point out that even if this article is true, Saddam most likely did not know how to refine his stockpile of nat uranium, therefore there WAS NO THREAT.
That still doesn't answer my question. If Sadam DID have unenriched Uranium, and it wasn't possible to be used for WMD's, what would he be doing with 500 tons of it?
Originally posted by Jakomo
mpeake:
That still doesn't answer my question. If Sadam DID have unenriched Uranium, and it wasn't possible to be used for WMD's, what would he be doing with 500 tons of it?
What the heck ELSE is he going to do with it? Dump it in the river? Sell it to any of the countries around him that want him dead?
The half-life is, what, 50,000 years?
Unenriched uranium is pretty tough to get rid of.
Go look at Yucca Mountain in Arizona for an idea.
Originally posted by mpeake
Originally posted by Jakomo
mpeake:
That still doesn't answer my question. If Sadam DID have unenriched Uranium, and it wasn't possible to be used for WMD's, what would he be doing with 500 tons of it?
What the heck ELSE is he going to do with it? Dump it in the river? Sell it to any of the countries around him that want him dead?
The half-life is, what, 50,000 years?
Unenriched uranium is pretty tough to get rid of.
Go look at Yucca Mountain in Arizona for an idea.
Look, I get that! I'm not asking why does hs still have it now. My question is what was he doing with it at all....if he can't use that much uranium for WMD's what would he have needed it for? UGH!
Originally posted by koji_K
Originally posted by mpeake
Originally posted by Jakomo
mpeake:
That still doesn't answer my question. If Sadam DID have unenriched Uranium, and it wasn't possible to be used for WMD's, what would he be doing with 500 tons of it?
What the heck ELSE is he going to do with it? Dump it in the river? Sell it to any of the countries around him that want him dead?
The half-life is, what, 50,000 years?
Unenriched uranium is pretty tough to get rid of.
Go look at Yucca Mountain in Arizona for an idea.
Look, I get that! I'm not asking why does hs still have it now. My question is what was he doing with it at all....if he can't use that much uranium for WMD's what would he have needed it for? UGH!
i don't think anyone doubts that saddam was planning on using the uranium as part of a WMD program (even if he couldn't, because it was yellowcake). as i've mentioned before though, intent to create WMD's does not pose an "immediate threat" nor the justification for war.
-koji K.
Though most reporters continue to insist that Iraq had abandoned its nuclear weapons program after the first Gulf War
Originally posted by Jakomo
mpeake:
That still doesn't answer my question. If Sadam DID have unenriched Uranium, and it wasn't possible to be used for WMD's, what would he be doing with 500 tons of it?
What the heck ELSE is he going to do with it? Dump it in the river? Sell it to any of the countries around him that want him dead?
The half-life is, what, 50,000 years?
Unenriched uranium is pretty tough to get rid of.
All five hundred tons were harmless
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Flyersfan, if I were you, I'd stretch a little and find more credible sources. If you tried using NewsMax to back up claims in any reputable news organization/newsroom in America, they'd laugh you out of the building. No offense, just giving you the straight dope.
What about the story that Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities of uranium from Africa? Dombey answers this succinctly: "So what? The IAEA has told me that Iraq already has hundreds of tons of uranium at its disposal. Without enrichment facilities this material is useless for nuclear weapons, though it could conceivably be used in conventional weapons in the same way that depleted uranium is used by the UK and the US."
Dombey points out that more than 50 countries would be able to build an atom bomb given sufficient fissile material. All it would require would be a research institution with a good physics department and an army familiar with explosives. "Every major Arab country and every EU country, except perhaps Luxembourg, can call on these assets." But how do you deliver it? A gun-type bomb is too big to fit into a missile and a compact bomb for a missile has to be tested to see if it will work. The Iraqis may have been working on these problems for years but there is not the slightest indication that they have solved them.
Originally posted by RANT
Originally posted by bzap
Finally, some evidence to help the WMD argument.
Oh yes...FINALLY!
FlyersFan, I've come to realize you think ATS members are stupid. Otherwise why in the name of creation would you keep posting NEWSMAX drivel and spin?
Did you know the good Professor Dombey being spun here is actually a HARSH CRITIC of the War in Iraq and claims of WMD? Did you know the ORIGIN of this NEWSLAX manipulation of statements is this article in the London Review of Books where the good professor TRASHES the WMD conspiracy theory left and right concluding:
All five hundred tons were harmless
He only says that 500 "enriched" tons of uranium could theoretically produce 140 weapons to further DEBUNK the claims of "Saddam's Bombmaker" that claimed Saddam could make as many as THREE.
I do wonder where NewsMax came up with the recalculation of 142 though from Dombey's calculation of 140. Perhaps 142 just sounded more ominous to all the Douglas Adams fans.