I was following the thread at work, I had flu too btw, but couldnt take it off.
I work in construction though so tougher that clever clever string theorists. I hope.
Any way funny stuff over with my point follows sir.
As a thruther and a man of reasonable judgement but most importantly common sense. I wish they did PHDs in common sense. You dont believe 911 was an
inside job, your answer was short and sweet, "no it wasnt".
As a scientist I would like to know what evidence you have based that theory on. As not a scientist but as an engineer with 20 years experience and
alot of construction common sense, please tell me you have followed the actual theory's (very much like your scientific theory) based on probability,
or just accepted the truth as the real truth is beyond your rational comprehension. ie "they" would never do it.
Sir with the evidence of free fall etc etc and what is common sense , please provide your "string" theory for why the 911 buildings (all 3) fell by
plane fuel and why building 7 fell with no plane. And stretching the probability theorem , 3 steel buildings fell by fire on 1 day for the first time
in steel frame history, 911 , and their is evidence historically of building hit by planes and didn't fall, not least the empire state building in the
Etc etc , my theorists please provide your reasoning for disbelieving the truths as told not least by the firemen on the ground, hearing explosion in
the basements (norm controlled methods, destroy the foundation to collapse on itself) and the puffs of interim explosions seen on video to remove the
path of resistance to the floor.
The buildings should have toppled and I hope you know that.
btw . I am loving your knowledge and thanks for sharing, but want to know what made you believe your truth , it may change MY mind. I have also worked
for one of the biggest demolition contractors in London.
edit on 27-6-2011 by Gooseygander because: (no reason given)