It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

are HERE any non-american 9/11 Official Story Believers?

page: 3
5
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 12:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Darkwing01
 


It is explained in detail why the buildings collapsed and this explanation is accepted in the scientific community. The couple of people who disagree have never been able to produce anything of relevance that either invalidates the official explanation or proves any of the claims they make. Anyone who thinks they know better will have to come with some convincing work, so far there is none. I have no reason whatsoever to believe those buildings collapsed from anything other than planes, fires and gravity. The reason some people believe this is not science, it has political motivations.

I also do not have any reason to believe that there were no hijackers. The story that they are still alive has long been debunked (people with the same name do exist). We all saw the planes, we all know the passengers died. The most simple explanation by far is that the planes we saw were actually the hijacked planes. Any other theory (such as remote controlled planes) is not supported by any evidence whatsoever.

But the question who was behind the attacks is another story. I personally believe it was a bunch of unorganized USA haters. I don't believe there was an international terrorist organization behind it lead by Osama Bin Laden. But it is very hard to swallow that a random bunch of unorganized nobodies could be able to perform an attack like that, which is the reason why Al Quida got the blame. It also gives an easy to identify enemy, which is also very useful when you have to control a population. I do not immediately object to this kind of lying, as long as the motives are to keep the population in check, although I suspect there were other motives also.




posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 02:23 AM
link   
reply to post by -PLB-
 





It is explained in detail why the buildings collapsed and this explanation is accepted in the scientific community.


I don't care what the scientific community accepts (they accepted phrenology too), an explanation relying on modelling without source is no explanation at all and reductio ad absurdum is not an argument for the assumption.

I don't doubt that most scientists accept the conclusions for pragmatic and political reasons, but I don't think that makes the reasoning used to arrive at those conclusions valid.



I also do not have any reason to believe that there were no hijackers.


An I don't have any reason to believe the Pope is not a Muslim either, what's more if I never look I am guaranteed to find any.

Great eh?

What was your point again?
edit on 27-6-2011 by Darkwing01 because: first part



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 02:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Acetradamus
 


Yes I am from the UK dont give a jot about what Americans think about their government I think its 100% as we ALL saw it on tv then again that may be due to the fact that.

1) When I left school my first job was in a STRUCTRAL STEEL design/drawing office
2) All my education was science/physics based.
3) I have worked in construction for 30+ years
4) I am on site most days and working on buildings/projects costing from a few thousands to £100m+

So I actually KNOW !!! something about the subject and DONT NEED some conspiracy site to tell me what they think or want to think happened!

Also the following FACTS!!!!!!

NO ONE repeat NO ONE knows the full extent of the damage done to the towers by the impacts,fuel explosion and then fires, yes thats right I said NO ONE on either side! BUT

Did planes impact with the buildings YES
Did that cause damage YES
Could the fuel explosion cause damage YES
Could the fires have caused further damage YES

So could what we saw happening actually happen YES!!!!!!!

Sorry but it really is that SIMPLE!


edit on 27-6-2011 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 02:30 AM
link   
reply to post by wmd_2008
 





Did planes impact with the buildings YES Did that cause damage YES Could the fuel explosion cause damage YES Could the fires have caused further damageYES So could what we saw happening actually happen YES!!!!!!!


Something scratched me last night.
I didn't see it.

Could it have been alien bed scratchers? Yes!!!!!!

So you are saying I was DEFINITELY attacked by alien bed scratchers last night. EEEEEEK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh wait...

[someone call the logic police]



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 02:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Darkwing01
reply to post by wmd_2008
 





Did planes impact with the buildings YES Did that cause damage YES Could the fuel explosion cause damage YES Could the fires have caused further damageYES So could what we saw happening actually happen YES!!!!!!!


Something scratched me last night.
I didn't see it.

Could it have been alien bed scratchers? Yes!!!!!!

So you are saying I was DEFINITELY attacked by alien bed scratchers last night. EEEEEEK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh wait...

[someone call the logic police]


Yes, I think you should call the "logic police" urgently. Witnesses to your "alien bed scratchers", including yourself, none. Witnesses to plane strikes to the WTC ? Fill in a figure but make it a big one.



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 02:53 AM
link   
Fact, there is no science that supports the OS. If I am wrong then someone please post the source to this science? Please do not waste our time with the fraudulent NIST Report either.

I thought foreigners had better info than the USA; however I see I am sadly wrong. I am impressed at how controlling the world media really is. 911 OS was the best brainwashing experience I have ever witness on a global scale, and what is really interesting is many people cannot logically “think” for themselves, they have to be told what to think.

To think for a moment: As if the media never lies. As if a Democracy couldn’t be compromise by greed and lies. As if the United States couldn’t commit a false flag. As if the US Military couldn’t become corrupt with too much power.

Wake up people, use your noggin. The United States the most powerfully Nation on earth which has the best Intel, best trained spies, trained in every langue, the best technologies, the most advanced Military in the world, US Military has the most advance satellite’s that covers the world and can pin point a dime on the ground in any country.

Yet some of you in here believe four airplanes can fly over highly restricted airspace such as over US (Nuclear Power Plants) fly off their given course after given their flight intentions from take off and completely ignore Tower control instructions. And if that is not insulting to our intelligent, believing four alleged airplanes did all this and flew around for a whole hour and no one saw a thing on radar, satellite, FAA, NORAD, even when FAA instructions were ignored?

How come this has never happened before in any country? Because it cannot.

911 is a proven fairytale from start to finish. The fact is the US government has admitted to lying and have been caught lying about the events of 911, why would any sane person want to believe in anything the government has to say, much less the 911 OS?

edit on 27-6-2011 by impressme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 03:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Darkwing01
I don't care what the scientific community accepts (they accepted phrenology too), an explanation relying on modelling without source is no explanation at all and reductio ad absurdum is not an argument for the assumption.

I don't doubt that most scientists accept the conclusions for pragmatic and political reasons, but I don't think that makes the reasoning used to arrive at those conclusions valid.


I am not really sure what you are talking about, but to me it doesn't matter what you think of the quality of the science concerning the tower collapses. I do not believe you are qualified to make such an assessment, and if you are, publish your work and I may listen to you.




An I don't have any reason to believe the Pope is not a Muslim either, what's more if I never look I am guaranteed to find any.

Great eh?

What was your point again?


My point is that there is no reason to believe there were no hijackers that is based on any evidence. And I try to avoid to base my opinion on anything else than evidence.



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 03:30 AM
link   
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
 


I'm from the UK and know for a fact that 9/11 and 7/7 were both false flag attacks!!
I have my reasons to call them facts and I suggest you do the research that I did and the facts become very clear!!
I have researched this subject extensively since 2004 and am in no doubt what so ever that foul play by TPTB took place........This is not even debatable anymore!!

But the sad thing is.....I'm a minority in the UK as it is very very well controlled by the MSM...people here are DUMB!!.....X factor or Britains got talent is king here!!....oh dear oh dear


I think logically and with pure common sense!

I'm an anphropologist and study human behaviour...and totally understand how Neuro-linguistic programming works!
edit on 27-6-2011 by zerozero00 because: cant spell




posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 04:54 AM
link   
reply to post by zerozero00
 


When you add 7/7 2005 to 9/11 as a false flag attack it just gets dumber and dumber. What was the supposed purpose of 7/7 as a false flag ?



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 06:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Alfie1
 





Yes, I think you should call the "logic police" urgently. Witnesses to your "alien bed scratchers", including yourself, none. Witnesses to plane strikes to the WTC ? Fill in a figure but make it a big one.



I hate to burst your bubble but those are contingent facts and as such have nothing whatsoever to do with logic.

Show me a witness to the natural events required by NIST to make their hypothesis work. You know as much as I do that the OS is based only on special pleading and doesn't feel it needs to bother with such inanities as empirical evidence or valid logical arguments.



My point is that there is no reason to believe there were no hijackers that is based on any evidence.


And as I pointed out earlier there is no good independent reason to believe that there were hijackers either, since the only evidence has a) been shown to be partially wrong (live hijackers), b) is sourced from dodgy videos, c) comes from people with vested interests (CIA) d) comes from people who have been known to lie publicly about matters in this domain at the HIGHEST level (Bush admin. before the U.N.) or e) was extracted under torture.

So shall I put you down as agnostic about the O.S. then?
edit on 27-6-2011 by Darkwing01 because: e)

edit on 27-6-2011 by Darkwing01 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 07:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Darkwing01
reply to post by wmd_2008
 





Did planes impact with the buildings YES Did that cause damage YES Could the fuel explosion cause damage YES Could the fires have caused further damageYES So could what we saw happening actually happen YES!!!!!!!


Something scratched me last night.
I didn't see it.

Could it have been alien bed scratchers? Yes!!!!!!

So you are saying I was DEFINITELY attacked by alien bed scratchers last night. EEEEEEK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh wait...

[someone call the logic police]



The perfect example of someone with NO clue

Did we see the planes yes, did they cause damage yes, did the fuel explode yes, did we see fires yes, Oh did Darkwing01 make himself look a D*** YES!!!



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 08:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by zerozero00


I'm an anphropologist and study human behaviour...and totally understand how Neuro-linguistic programming works!
edit on 27-6-2011 by zerozero00 because: cant spell



Just a pity you haven't studied construction or engineering then!!!



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 08:16 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


Got that data on the steel being tested to 2500 degrees for several hours, I will keep asking!!!



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 08:20 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 



Fact, there is no science that supports the OS.

Well, except for all that science.

If I am wrong then someone please post the source to this science?

Post a source for science? Could you be a little more vague?

Please do not waste our time with the fraudulent NIST Report either.

In other words, "no science please, it confuses and frightens me".

I thought foreigners had better info than the USA;

Uh, why?

....however I see I am sadly wrong.

Irony of ironies is that is the first thing you said that is right.

I am impressed at how controlling the world media really is.

In other words, you can't find any other rational outlet of information that agrees with you, ergo they all must be "in on it".

911 OS was the best brainwashing experience I have ever witness on a global scale, and what is really interesting is many people cannot logically “think” for themselves, they have to be told what to think.

Do you ever think for one minute that there may be an alternative explanation to the concept that everyone in the world, except you, is brainwashed?

To think for a moment: As if the media never lies.

Therefore everything they say is a lie?

As if a Democracy couldn’t be compromise by greed and lies.

An you alternative?

As if the United States couldn’t commit a false flag.

The possible is not proof of the reality.

As if the US Military couldn’t become corrupt with too much power.

To the point where they would knowingly murder 1000's of their fellow citizens in cold blood?

Wake up people, use your noggin. The United States the most powerfully Nation on earth which has the best Intel, best trained spies, trained in every langue, the best technologies, the most advanced Military in the world, US Military has the most advance satellite’s that covers the world and can pin point a dime on the ground in any country.

I think you may be confusing capable with in fallible.

Yet some of you in here believe four airplanes can fly over highly restricted airspace such as over US (Nuclear Power Plants) fly off their given course after given their flight intentions from take off and completely ignore Tower control instructions.

Oh boy, here we go again. The airspace over the US is not and never has been an impenetrable fortress. There are literally 1000's of planes in the air over the US at any given moment, everything from ultralights to C-130's.

And if that is not insulting to our intelligent, believing four alleged airplanes did all this and flew around for a whole hour and no one saw a thing on radar, satellite, FAA, NORAD, even when FAA instructions were ignored?

Rewriting history again, huh?

How come this has never happened before in any country? Because it cannot.

Huh? No plane ever flew off course in any country before without getting shot down 5 seconds after it deviated from the approved flight path? Wake up.

911 is a proven fairytale from start to finish.

You're right, except, of course, for the "proven" part.

The fact is the US government has admitted to lying and have been caught lying about the events of 911, why would any sane person want to believe in anything the government has to say, much less the 911 OS?

Because sane, rational, reasonable people are able to make value judgements based on real experience. Irrational people like to dismiss any source of information that would disturb their fantasy.



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 08:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
How come this has never happened before in any country? Because it cannot.


Oh dear, so you have never heard of Mathias Rust, who defeated the best air defence system in the world, during the cold war....

Your ignorance of such matters is not surprising



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 08:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Darkwing01
 
Dark, I believe you are one of our most informed and most articulate spokesman. Don't ever give up the fight. This whole thread is bs because aside from the handful of knuckleheads backing the OS, we all know that if anyone who actually investigates the facts believes the OS, then they have an agenda that doesn't require the truth. If Europeans are as dumb as they are portrayed here, (we know their not) it still doesn't stop us from pursuing the truth, wherever it leads.



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 11:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by Darkwing01
 
Dark, I believe you are one of our most informed and most articulate spokesman.


Possibly true. Although you're talking about an individual who has apparently managed to avoid any evidence relating to the Pope's catholicity, so it's probably only among Truthers that he'd be considered an A student.


Don't ever give up the fight. This whole thread is bs because aside from the handful of knuckleheads backing the OS, we all know that if anyone who actually investigates the facts believes the OS, then they have an agenda that doesn't require the truth. If Europeans are as dumb as they are portrayed here, (we know their not) it still doesn't stop us from pursuing the truth, wherever it leads.


I may be stupid, but I am at least aware of the difference between "their" and "they're". I also don't require constant reassurances to "keep up the fight". Because I'm not a cultist with a vast array of scientific and logical reasoning lined up against me.
edit on 27-6-2011 by TrickoftheShade because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 12:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Acetradamus
 


Just to reflect back to your OP a moment, it would seem that, contrary to your expectations, there are quite a few non-US members who don't have any time for truther theories.



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 12:31 PM
link   
I believe the official story and i'm an American and very happy to debate this with anyone.

I've got a couple questions nobody has ever been able to answer.



posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 12:45 PM
link   
I'm undecided, though based on Operation Northwoods, 9/11 being an inside job is far from unimaginable.




top topics



 
5
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join