It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well, as I said before I left, I have lost a hell of a lot of faith in Green. For those who may be interested (or who remember ), since I was last here I have been able to confirm (via a call to the Court of Session) that my suspicion that Green did not lodge a defence against the Interim Interdict brought by Buchanan (A72/10 Lord Emslie presiding) was correct. As I suspected (and as Basil had informed Tom George) the Interdict became final on the 25th of March. So on that one at least, Green was lying and Basil was telling the truth. There is one potentially strange thing regarding the Interdict. That is, why is there no record of it in the public domain? (You may tell Green I was bluffing him. ) I was told by the Court of Session that it would only appear on the new on-line database of decisions if the presiding judge (Lord Emslie presumably) had written it up. www.bailii.org... Somewhat strangely though, it also does not appear on the court rolls (11th of February or 25th of March, I have not yet checked all the entries around those dates). www.scotcourts.gov.uk... There may be something in this, as apparently the highly dubious (illegal?!) ‘sectioning’ style judgement against Andy McCardle (www.youtube.com...) did not appear on any court rolls. The young lady I spoke to at the Court of Session told me cases often do not appear while they are in progress. This could explain the omission on the 11th of February. However, it surely can’t explain why there is no mention of it on the 25th of March? If you want to verify the inconvenient truth regarding Robert’s Interdict for yourself, then you can call the Court of Session on 0131 240 6880 and quote the case number (A72/10), the pursuer (Buchanan), the defender (Green) and the presiding judge (Lord Emslie). You may have to remind them that Interdicts are public documents. You could also ask them why there is no mention of it on the court rolls.
Originally posted by MARKDALY
I really cannot be bothered other than to add that commas apart that the person known as justy starts using capital letters correctly yet in later posts capital letters are no where to be seen by him . Two people ?
Originally posted by stevenmilne
Yesterday I posted 5 critical facts (not opinions, not interpretations) relating to the Hollie Greig case.
No-one has been able to challenge them or to explain how these facts might point to something other than a cover-up.
this is for my mother.
would anyone reading this who knows my mum please ensure that she reads this, i would very much like her to get in touch with me. i have given my phone number and email to the other greg. please phone, write or come and see me, please. if you need an extra reason mum... i know you would not want to miss my wedding.
i would like to ask you to forgive me for lying to you ten years ago. i know you lost faith in me but understand it was a white lie. it wasnt actually a lie, i was so stressed and confused, i just didnt tell you. i knew it would tear you apart so i elected not to tell you. i did not tell dad either.
i did not tell anyone. dad discovered the letter by chance and he confronted me and we decided not tell you, because we knew it would massively, massively hurt you. it did. it was the wrong decision mum and the worst decision in my life. please get in touch and let me explain absolutely everything to you and apologise personally. i promise you i will never lie to you again. i have nothing to hide from you.
i am sorry it has taken so long to write this.
i found it hard to accept that you wanted to leave and when you took hollie away... ...in my head it broke the family mum. i apologise if i have embarrassed you, but i have come to my senses. i am my mothers son, my pride is my family and i forgive you for leaving, please forgive me for not understanding your reasons. i am proud to be your son.
hollie was never abused mum. hollie was never unhappy. hollie made sure our family was always smiling. thats what i remember.
mum. do not be fooled by mr green and make no mistake he wants a court case that is his only agenda. i was never abused, hollie was never abused, XXX´s children weren´t abused, XXX´s children werent abused...
please get in touch urgently i have more to tell you that you really need to know.
Greg Charles Mann Mackie
You made me promise to protect Hollie if anything ever happened to you or dad, do you remember?
Something happened to you ten years ago and I couldn't stop it. You ran away and have never wanted to return.
I have rediscovered through these last ten years that your mother was a very wise woman. Please listen to her wisdom before you let Mr Green face trial and be very proud of your mum. For a start she would tell you about telling stories...
I have no doubt in my mind and my heart that Hollie says what she says because she understands it will make you happy/feel better. I do not believe she was abused by anyone and I was never abused! Were you? We were a happy family despite what life threw at times, because Hollie was always happy.
Hollie always had the most loyalty for her mum, do you remember? You know she hates hurting your feelings the most, don't you? I would say she was never capable of hurting your feelings, and even when she thought she had done she used to change her story straight away to side with her mum. Do you remember?
Before, you asked me to blame all problems on my dad and I couldnt do that, is that what Hollie has done for you now? Dad's job kept him away a lot and it was hard on us all mum.
All I have ever wanted in life was a happy family, please get in touch.
Originally posted by stevenmilne
5 In 2009, the Lord Advocate, Elish Angiolini wrote to newspapers warning them they would face legal action if they covered the Hollie Greig story.
Originally posted by stevenmilne
Please, please, please keep on posting your demented nonsense as you perfectly demonstrate the mentality of the tiny band of people who try to derail the Hollie Greig case.
/me snickers - they will probably blame me (in their secret, hidden facebook group) for hacking ats to make sure they couldn't reply to the post. that's the type of thing i have been blamed for in the past
Originally posted by Master_007
I was interested in hearing what you wanted to say but when asked for links to back up what you are saying all i got was a link to a image i could not read and rants when i pointed this out and i've see lots of slander but nothing to back it up and please tell me how you prove a link has been removed when it's gone and you can not provide a copy of the original.
.................>>>>>> link here removd
SORRY I CAN’T TELL YOU ANYTHING BUT WATCH THIS SPACE, SAYS ANNE
Posted Sat, 06/18/2011 – 19:15 by Belinda
Much as she would like to update everyone on the latest position in her battle with the law, Anne is not at liberty to do so, having been blocked from speaking publicly by ALL the authorities involved, including the judiciary, both Councils (Shropshire and Aberdeen) and both police forces (West Mercia and Grampian) who are refusing to release incident log books.
Anne asks, what are all these public officials so afraid of, if they are doing their jobs properly and with probity?