It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is no comparison between the legal financial obligations our society puts on fatherhood and the phsyical realty of actually carrying a child. To pretend this is comparable is absurd.
Originally posted by queenofsheba
reply to post by Jepic
My husband never shared the womb with me, our child did, but not him. Different people. Completely different individuals who share DNA but not him in there, nope, he was in his mom's womb, though. Not mine.
Funny, funny boys....edit on 25-6-2011 by queenofsheba because: add line
Originally posted by Jepic
Originally posted by queenofsheba
reply to post by Jepic
My husband never shared the womb with me, our child did, but not him. Different people. Completely different individuals who share DNA but not him in there, nope, he was in his mom's womb, though. Not mine.
Funny, funny boys....edit on 25-6-2011 by queenofsheba because: add line
Uhm hello! Your whole body doesn't need to be in there to have shared a womb, just your penis which it was during sex.
Originally posted by Dilligaf28
Originally posted by Bee2010
I am sick to death of you psycho people trying to argue a woman's rights to her own body away.
You will never be able to control another human being and force them to do what you think is best.
You will also never be able to opt out of paying child support purely because the government doesn't want to pay for your mistakes.
Your statement is riddled with hypocrisy. you say "you will never be able to control another human being and force them to do what you think is best" and immediately say "you also will never be able to opt out of paying child support".
It basically says "you will not tell me what to do but i will tell you what to do".
Do you really feel that its ok for you to claim that no one can control another human being and then immediately make the statement that human beings will be controlled?
edit on 25-6-2011 by Dilligaf28 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by gabby2011
reply to post by Bee2010
I am sick to death of you psycho people trying to argue a woman's rights to her own body away. You will never be able to control another human being and force them to do what you think is best. You will also never be able to opt out of paying child support purely because the government doesn't want to pay for your mistakes.
How utterly hypocritical of you. You do not believe a woman should be controlled and told what to do with her body?..what about a man? does he have no say on what is to happen to his life.
Typical selfish response..".I can have a baby if I want to and you have to pay up....its my choice, and your choice is null and void.
Originally posted by Bee2010
Originally posted by Jepic
Originally posted by queenofsheba
reply to post by Jepic
My husband never shared the womb with me, our child did, but not him. Different people. Completely different individuals who share DNA but not him in there, nope, he was in his mom's womb, though. Not mine.
Funny, funny boys....edit on 25-6-2011 by queenofsheba because: add line
Uhm hello! Your whole body doesn't need to be in there to have shared a womb, just your penis which it was during sex.
Umm hello! You do realise that a mans penis never enters the womb during intercourse don't you?
Oh Gabby Gabby Gabby, do you not understand that it is the government of the country you reside in that decides if a man must pay child support or not? If it were up to the woman, without the laws, she would have no say. Just as a man has no say over a woman's body.
Originally posted by Bee2010
Originally posted by Dilligaf28
Originally posted by Bee2010
I am sick to death of you psycho people trying to argue a woman's rights to her own body away.
You will never be able to control another human being and force them to do what you think is best.
You will also never be able to opt out of paying child support purely because the government doesn't want to pay for your mistakes.
Your statement is riddled with hypocrisy. you say "you will never be able to control another human being and force them to do what you think is best" and immediately say "you also will never be able to opt out of paying child support".
It basically says "you will not tell me what to do but i will tell you what to do".
Do you really feel that its ok for you to claim that no one can control another human being and then immediately make the statement that human beings will be controlled?
edit on 25-6-2011 by Dilligaf28 because: (no reason given)
It's the government that tries to force a person to pay child support at the end of the day. They are the ones who made the child support laws. You could kill yourself or leave the country as a stowaway on a boat or change your identity. You could injure yourself so you are legally unable to work. The government does not have complete control.
When I wrote "you will never be able to control another human being and force them to do what you think is best", it was the father of the unborn that I was writing to.
I agree. I would have no problem with women deciding what to with their own bodies, as long as the man doesn't have to pay for the possible result of that choice.
Originally posted by James1982
A few of my opinions on the issue...
Is a baby the property of the mother? Or is it joint property of the mother and father? If it's joint property, then both should have a say in what happens to the baby, and both have a responsibility to provide for that baby.
If it's not joint property, and the mother is the owner of the child, and the only one who can choose what happens to the baby, then the mother should be the only one that is responsible for providing for that baby.
You shouldn't be able to have it both ways. If it's your property, you pay for it. If it's both parents property, then both have a say in the baby's birth, and both have a responsibility to provide for it.
Thinking otherwise is hypocritical, and there is no way around it. So if someone thinks a woman should have 100% control over the child, but then only share 50% of the financial burden to raise that child, that's fine, but just admit you are a hypocrite. It's either 100% control, and 100% responsibility, or it's 50/50 for both, in which case the father has a say in the birth of the child.
Originally posted by Partygirl
Human beings are not property. No part of any human being can be considered the property of another.
This includes unborn children who are very much people by the way...