Al Qaeda possible revenge attack, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 24-6-2011 @ 04:42 AM by p00hbear
A few weeks ago the newspapers revealed that a senior Al Qaeda operative stated the terrorist group were in possession of a nuclear bomb.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the operational commander of al-Qaeda who was detained at Guantanamo and will stand trial this year for his role as the mastermind of the attacks 11 September 2001, was the source of this claim. He said that they had a hidden nuclear facility somewhere in Europe according to documents leaked to Wikileaks.

Muhammed said that they would detonate it if Osama bin Laden captured or killed. He explained that al-Qaeda will launch an attack “nuclear hell” in the entire world if that happened.

I suspect that the nukes Al Qaeda got hold of was the one of three ex-South African nuclear bombs that Margaret Thatcher ordered David Cameron to hand over to an international arms dealer John Bredenkamp in 1989.

These three nuclear weapons were sent from South Africa to Oman where Dr. David Kelly was in charge of ensuring their safety.

They were held in an unsecure military facility and were later stolen by sold on by Bredenkamp to Saddam Hussein.

These weapons were then shipped to Syria during the war against Iraq.

I suspect that one of these weapons are the ones that Al Qaeda say they have got hold of.

It means that potentially there are three nuclear weapons in the hands of Islamist terrorists.

Now many people have been saying for a while that a nuclear weapons attack would be undertaken in the US – and if it is then the nuclear weapon invlved will be one of these South African bombs.

This is why Dr. David Kelly was murdered – he knew the full story about the nuclear bombs shipped from South Africa and what the British and American forces were looking for in Iraq.

They were looking for the stolen South African weapons that had been sold to Saddam Hussein by Bredenkamp.

If the full story of these bombs were exposed as the basis of the search for WMD in Iraq, then the full story of Margaret Thatcher and David Camerons role in the affiar would become known.

What does this mean.

It means that Al Qaeda have access to potentially three nuclear weapons.

It may be that the reason why Osama Bin Laden was killed was because these weapons have been located – and hence the blackmail threat by Al Qaeda to explode one in the event of Osama Bin Ladens death was no longer operative and hence the ‘kill order’ was issued to execute Osama Bin Laden – who would also have known about the history of these Al Qaeda obtained bombs.

This could be the secret note handed to President Obama by Brigadier General Wilson on April 29th, 2011 which allowed Obama to approve the execution of Osama Bin Laden.

This may also be the reason why Osama Bin Laden was allowed to stay alive for so long by the US – as they must have known where he was living in Pakistan for years.

Until they either founds the bombs, or were prepared for one of the bombs to go off and exploit it politically – then they had to allow Osama Bin Laden to stay alive.

It may also be that we are about to experience a ‘false flag’ nuclear weapons attack in order to act as a pretext for the US or Europe to impose martial law as a result of the looming economic collapse.

This would also explain why the US have started to order massive amounts of anti-radiation sickness pills in anticaption of a nuclear terrorist attack

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said it was trying to entice someone, somewhere, into making drugs to treat people for internal radiation poisoning.

It said it had identified two compounds that could be made into safe drugs and called on companies to come up with plans for making them.

The compounds, pentetate calcium trisodium (Ca-DTPA) and pentetate zinctrisodium (Zn-DTPA), can be safe and effective for the treatment of internal contamination with plutonium, americium, or curium, the FDA said.

p00hbear


reply posted on 24-6-2011 @ 02:51 PM by OtherSideOfTheCoin
So what do I think of the original article and not this plagiarised thread.

Not very much.

During 1989 Dr David Kelly was working on the inspection of WMD in the Soviet Union, and not on supervising 3 nuclear weapons in Oman gave to some arms dealer by David Cameron through Thatcher. Also David Cameron didn’t graduate until 1988 he started work with the conservatives in 1989, are we really expected to believe that the government at the time got a guy strait out of university to undertake this ultra secret operation. Also David Kelly was a Biological weapons expert, not a nuclear expert and why would the British government hand over nuclear weapons to a international arms dealer.

But let’s go further, this article goes on to claim that that this arms dealer stole the nukes form David Kelly and sold them to Iraq. Kelly received a nomination for the Nobel peace prize for his work in uncovering Saddam’s Biological weapons program during the 90’s, so I am pretty sure he would have had a idea that his allegedly lost nukes were with Saddam. It doesn’t really matter because these 3 nukes just don’t exist.

I love the allegation that they ended up in the hands of Al’Qa’ida, Bin Laden hated Saddam and Saddam knew Bin Laden hated him so why on earth would he ever supply one of his enemy’s with nuclear weapons. It just would not happen, even the (REAL) author of this article claims that he “thinks” this is what happened, he “thinks” this because actually known’s nothing about international terrorism. He demonstrates this by referring to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as Mohammed rather than KSM as most people who know about the man do, just a little thing but it say’s allot to me.

If Al’Qa’ida really did have nukes, and they don’t, as KSM has claimed are we really expected to believe that he would tell his interrogators about it. The biggest ace up Al’Qa’ida’s sleeve and he tells US intelligence about it. its it not far more likely that, KSM was feeding the Americans with misinformation or that the American government are just spouting more pointless propaganda.

And how can you OP (sorry the original author) claim that they found these nukes that never really existed then make out that there is going to be a false flag.

So not only is this entire thread plagiarised but it’s not even a very good article to plagiarise because the REAL author has either just made this up of the top of his head or he knows nothing about terrorism.

And that is the other side of the coin........
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Alert: Possible Terror-related activity in NW Ohio
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
\'Bin Laden died of natural causes\'
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Was it a drone that almost caused mid-air over Denver?
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
US shadow war in Horn of Africa revealed by blogger
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags